Jump to content

Go get ________________________________


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

I'm taking Getz at his word that Cease is their opening day starter. 

Therefore, I'm going to sign Lorenzen to a 2/$24 deal. He would help a lot, especially when it comes to not having to vulture guys from the bullpen. At some point, Lorenzen can go to the bullpen since he's done that before. 2 year deal protects you because next year Burnes is gone, Means is gone, and Bradish may or may not be under recovering from TJS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

With the pitching injuries, who do you advocate going and getting (including paying their asking price: contract or trade)? Do you think we should do nothing and trust our guys? Who do you realistically think will target, if any?

I believe @Frobby listed projected arbitration increases for our core 10 players would exceed our current top 10 players by about $20m or so four years from now. If that's where payrolls are going (and they should be) I'd like to see them go ahead and make that payroll jump to +/- $120m starting this year and giving Montgomery +/-$25m a year. His contract would come off the books as you'd need to start paying $25m+ to Adley/Gunnar/Holliday.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spy Fox said:

Ryu 1/10 or something if they go the FA route. 

One of the Marlins guys if they go the trade route.

It doesn't seem like ANYbody is in on Ryu. You would think he'd be easy to grab. Familiar with the division, LF wall, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always been of the opinion that we needed another guy BEFORE Bradish's injury.   I don't trust Means to be a dependable starter.   I still think they need to make a trade and sign a guy that can start or be in the pen.   I'm not a big fan of Lorenzen, but he fits that mold as the #5 guy, then could slide back to the bullpen if needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sportsfan8703 said:

What worries me is that Elias has already known about this.  So the Burnes trade was the reactionary move.  

He said they had been working on the deal since November so I don't think it was reactionary. Good on Elias for keeping Bradish's injury under wraps and not giving up leverage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...