Jump to content

Jorge Mateo 2024


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Echoing @Frobby's thoughts, last year MLB Network did that whole thing with DeRosa analyzing his swing, the toe-tap, whatever....everyone thought that the breakout was real. 

Fool me once, shame on me...I'm not getting fooled again though.  It's nice to watch him hit when he's on a heater but there's no doubt in my mind he'll revert back to form at some point in the near future.  

I do love watching him in the field though.  He's picked up second base really quickly and plays very well.

Watching Mateo run is weirdly one of the best things to see. His speed is eye popping. 
 

Mateo has surprised me by seemingly giving his career a boost by showing he can play other positions and play them well.  I was skeptical of how he would do in that super UTI role and while I still am, the skepticism is a lot less. 
 

I am now seeing a player that, even if his OPS ends up closer to 600 than 700, that I feel is more “rosterable” than any other time since he has been here.

Now, whether or not I will feel that way next year when the salary increases remains to be seen but last year, I wanted him cut. This year, I would cut Urias over him now and I have always been a Urias fan and would have cut Mateo in favor of Urias probably as late as a month ago.(I really don’t want to cut him either)

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Malike said:

Don't forget to check your AOL email using Netscape browser.

Please go visit my geocities Jorge Mateo fan site for the most up to date information.  It has Hotmail integration so you can get daily updates.

 

Damn, now I kind of want to make a geocities Jorge Mateo fansite. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Hint: He's 29 and has a .641 career OPS in over 1200 plate appearances spanning five seasons. Good chance it'll be around .641.

For sure.  I just don’t want to see him completely fall off a cliff like he did last year.  I’m kinda hoping he can be a .690-.700 guy for a year or 2.  I don’t expect it, but keeping my fingers crossed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

For sure.  I just don’t want to see him completely fall off a cliff like he did last year.  I’m kinda hoping he can be a .690-.700 guy for a year or 2.  I don’t expect it, but keeping my fingers crossed.  

That would be nice. But whenever a player has some success, especially in modern baseball with ubiquitous data, everyone in the league is pouring over all the video and Statcast info to find a weakness, and they'll attack him in different ways. He'll have to adjust to that. In the past that hasn't gone over so well. It's not just a case of Mateo fixing some flaw, it's usually him having to adjust to being pitched differently by doing things differently (and often not so successfully) as well.

Edited by DrungoHazewood
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, interloper said:

Tell that to Ryan O'Hearn. ;) 

Much of O'Hearn's "improvement" is because of the shift ban. O'Hearn's wOBA in non-shift/non-shade configuration from 2021-2024: .432, .350, .358, .529. In 2023-24 his shade (the mild shift that's still legal) wOBA is .329 and .318, while from 2019-2022 when the shift was legal his wOBA into the shift was .278, .267, .243, .249. I think the Statcast data is pretty clear-cut: he was destroyed by the more extreme shifts. Good on the Orioles for identifying that ahead of the shift ban last year.

I don't think anything like this applies to Mateo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DrungoHazewood said:

Much of O'Hearn's "improvement" is because of the shift ban. O'Hearn's wOBA in non-shift/non-shade configuration from 2021-2024: .432, .350, .358, .529. In 2023-24 his shade (the mild shift that's still legal) wOBA is .329 and .318, while from 2019-2022 when the shift was legal his wOBA into the shift was .278, .267, .243, .249. I think the Statcast data is pretty clear-cut: he was destroyed by the more extreme shifts. Good on the Orioles for identifying that ahead of the shift ban last year.

I don't think anything like this applies to Mateo.

Stand down soldier! The winky emoji is doing most of the work in my comment.  :)

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mateo’s OpS is dropping because he’s playing too much.  
 

The Os really want him to be an everyday guy because they love the tools..but he’s not that.

Face mostly lefties, limit the at bats under 300 and he probably can be a productive bench guy.

Play him everyday and he gets exposed. The Os need to play Urias more, especially vs righties, as he is better vs righties than Mateo is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

That would be nice. But whenever a player has some success, especially in modern baseball with ubiquitous data, everyone in the league is pouring over all the video and Statcast info to find a weakness, and they'll attack him in different ways. He'll have to adjust to that. In the past that hasn't gone over so well. It's not just a case of Mateo fixing some flaw, it's usually him having to adjust to being pitched differently by doing things differently (and often not so successfully) as well.

Very good point.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, interloper said:

Stand down soldier! The winky emoji is doing most of the work in my comment.  :)

Sorry! I just pretty regularly see posts here and (mostly) elsewhere that are of the form "Ryan O'Hearn had a miraculous transformation when he came to the O's. Either they're awesome, or the Royals are idiots, probably both!" But the truth is (mostly) that O'Hearn was wiped out by the shift.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Sorry! I just pretty regularly see posts here and (mostly) elsewhere that are of the form "Ryan O'Hearn had a miraculous transformation when he came to the O's. Either they're awesome, or the Royals are idiots, probably both!" But the truth is (mostly) that O'Hearn was wiped out by the shift.

Right, O'Hearn has always hit the ball hard. The shift definitely hurt him. His HH % is the lowest of his career this year, but his exit velo and Barrel % are both pretty good in 2024. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Mateo’s OpS is dropping because he’s playing too much.  
 

The Os really want him to be an everyday guy because they love the tools..but he’s not that.

Face mostly lefties, limit the at bats under 300 and he probably can be a productive bench guy.

Play him everyday and he gets exposed. The Os need to play Urias more, especially vs righties, as he is better vs righties than Mateo is.

I honestly don't think the bolded is the case.

The plan was almost certainly for Holliday to be getting the lion's share of 2b ABs.

And for Mateo to be in a role much as you described.

However, performance- both of Holliday and Mateo- have dictated otherwise.  For now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Pickles said:

I honestly don't think the bolded is the case.

The plan was almost certainly for Holliday to be getting the lion's share of 2b ABs.

And for Mateo to be in a role much as you described.

However, performance- both of Holliday and Mateo- have dictated otherwise.  For now.

They still have other alternatives to playing Mateo everyday and the performance hasn’t been great at the plate for a lot of this month.

They talk themselves into him as an everyday guy. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They still have other alternatives to playing Mateo everyday and the performance hasn’t been great at the plate for a lot of this month.

They talk themselves into him as an everyday guy. 

I think it's basically that neither he nor Urias are going to hit much, so you might as well play the guy who makes insane plays at 2B like he did today. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They still have other alternatives to playing Mateo everyday and the performance hasn’t been great at the plate for a lot of this month.

They talk themselves into him as an everyday guy. 

Well, I think they like him more than Urias and that's basically it.

If he starts to struggle w the bat, and Urias hits some more, then their playing time will be adjusted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • This clip shows Bradish shaking his elbow a few times. Also throwing 99 which might have had something to do with it. I hope he learned his limitations.  Kyle Bradish's strong start against Phillies | 06/14/2024 | MLB.com
    • I'm kind of heading towards rooting for Kjerstad or Beavers to be trade centerpiece of whatever comes. EBJ's 2024 has been pretty tepid so he is not at a good sell point.     Norby seems to fit well as a backup to future outfields mostly made up of Cowser-Mullins-Kjerstad-Beavers-EBJ. The other 29 clubs, including whatever dozen odd end up selling next month - there are probably enough variances in their takes on Kjerstad and Beavers there is something Elias can arbitrage. I take it as a given someone like Seth Johnson or Trace Bright at least will be a secondary piece, guessing Povich-McDermott-De Leon-Forret maybe represent a tier Elias prefers to keep.
    • Gibson has a career 5.09 ERA in the 2nd half. And he turns 37 in October. He's due for some regression.
    • Yeah I am kind of torn on that.   Obviously you don't something actually on the ball so that the ball may go through the air differently, but if pitchers are having to over compensate to try and get the grip and therefore the spin that they want.....then is it worth it to allow a substance so you can avoid all of these injuries?   Let a pitcher keep something sticky on his glove or hat and allow him to be able to touch that area if he wants.  I really don't see a problem with it. For example, as much as some of you hate my bowling references, in bowling we do the same exact thing that a pitcher does, try to get as good a grip as possible so that we can create as many rpm revs, spin and hook as possible.  All the best bowlers have rev rates in the 500s and we are all allowed to put whatever we want on our hands to create that.  Rosin.  Stickem.   Tape on the fingers.  Tape inside of the bowling ball fingers.....whatever.  And I have never in my life heard anyone say that doing that should be illegal.  It is legal, everyone does it, and no one has a problem with it.  We are also allowed to surface our balls with a sand paper like pad that can give it a surface that hooks more, or a surface that hooks less. Again, all perfectly legal.  I think baseball may have to adjust their thinking on this if pitchers keep falling like flies. 
    • That probably happens but its not a big deal. Smartphones probably do tons of data tracking on what you search online. And they know exactly where you are at all times.
    • I thought trying to resign Flaherty would have been a better choice, assuming he wanted to stay of course.  He had a better track record of being very very good compared to Gibson Again though, I have no idea if he even would have resigned. 
    • I thought trying to resign Flaherty would have been a better choice, assuming he wanted to stay of course.  He had a better track record of being very very good compared to Gibson Again though, I have no idea if he even would have resigned. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...