Jump to content

Cade Povich 2024


emmett16

Recommended Posts

I don't have time to look up major league comps, but after looking at his statcast last night, this is repertoire with movement. Remember, these are averages. He throws some better, some worse.

Pitch          MPH            HMOV  VMOV
Fastball       91.8              9           -13
Curveball    75.2             -9          -65 (He has some as high as 70)
Cutter         88.2             -2          -25
Sweeper     82.7             -12         -39 (most inconsistent pitch)
Change      84.8              14          -30          

Because he has not reached the big league yet, it does not give us movement date besides a pitch graph in a pitch breakdown, so these are generalized. 

I did noticed he really struggled to get his changeup over (18% zone) and only had a 48% in zone for his fastball. He used his cutter the second most of his pitches and got that over at 73% and his sweeper, although inconsistent by movement, he got over 71% (only threw 7 though).

Seems to me he's incorporating the cutter in more and the curveball has plus movement and plus plus at times for his velocity.
 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Yes..whole career.  We are talking about how someone can perform at this level, correct?

 Now, you provided something worth discussing.

Blake Snell has made an excellent pro career with poor str% numbers.

He is an exception to the rule for sure. (aJ Burnett is probably another guy)

Do you think Povich has the stuff and ability to be what Snell has been?

And btw, the numbers you are showing are for qualified players only.  That makes it a little misleading when you say 50th.  50th is actually at or near the bottom of qualified starters.  That isn’t good, just so you know. (We have already proven that math isn’t your strong point here)

Just a reminder that his strike % is what it is with a robot umpire, so it might be safe to assume it goes up a few % in the majors.

That said, 61% is the number for 1 game (I think), so I'd need to know more about his trends. Also, he may nibble more in the majors, lowering that %. So there are unknowns.

His profile is very intriguing for sure. I don't think your focus on strike % is in any way disqualifying, but it's obvious that command/control has been his developmental issue for years, so this all bears watching.

All in all, he's had a nice year so far and seems to be continuing his development well. He also fits excellently at Camden Yards as a LH, so I'm really bullish on this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My take - Two guys striving to be the brightest light bulb in the room. Let  the game continue. 😃 Meanwhile a kid is trying to make it to the Major Leagues and making progress!!!!!!!!! Seems simple to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Just a reminder that his strike % is what it is with a robot umpire, so it might be safe to assume it goes up a few % in the majors.

That said, 61% is the number for 1 game (I think), so I'd need to know more about his trends. Also, he may nibble more in the majors, lowering that %. So there are unknowns.

His profile is very intriguing for sure. I don't think your focus on strike % is in any way disqualifying, but it's obvious that command/control has been his developmental issue for years, so this all bears watching.

All in all, he's had a nice year so far and seems to be continuing his development well. He also fits excellently at Camden Yards as a LH, so I'm really bullish on this guy.

Well, you are also assuming that maybe pitches minor leaguers are swinging at, MLers would swing at. I think when you combine his history and the results we have seen, that is a lot to think he would come up here and be a league average strike thrower.

The question i have is simply, is his stuff good enough for that not to matter?

There are rare circumstances where that is the case. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'll be honest, I did not see them. Though in my defense, Sports Guy weaves a tapestry of insults like Mozart puts together a piano concerto, so I may have missed them due to normalcy bias.

“Mozart puts together a piano concerto” is a phrase I never expected to see from you or anyone else on OH.  Bravo!  😁😂🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Yes..whole career.  We are talking about how someone can perform at this level, correct?

 Now, you provided something worth discussing.

Blake Snell has made an excellent pro career with poor str% numbers.

He is an exception to the rule for sure. (aJ Burnett is probably another guy)

Do you think Povich has the stuff and ability to be what Snell has been?

And btw, the numbers you are showing are for qualified players only.  That makes it a little misleading when you say 50th.  50th is actually at or near the bottom of qualified starters.  That isn’t good, just so you know. (We have already proven that math isn’t your strong point here)

Dude, no one is saying Povich is going to be a top 30 pitcher in the game.  He can find success as a LHP in the bottom 20% of str%.  Again, LHP get leash...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, btdart20 said:

Dude, no one is saying Povich is going to be a top 30 pitcher in the game.  He can find success as a LHP in the bottom 20% of str%.  Again, LHP get leash...

He can also find a ton of failure.  Most pitchers who don’t throw strikes struggle.

And I’m saying this talking about a starter, not a reliever. He absolutely doesn’t need to throw a ton of strikes as a reliever.  That has been proven.

But as a starter, he is very unlikely to be another Snell..IE a high pitch count, high walk pitcher that goes limited innings.  That’s a very hard combo to be good at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

“Mozart puts together a piano concerto” is a phrase I never expected to see from you or anyone else on OH.  Bravo!  😁😂🤣

I have my moments! :D

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, HuskerFan said:

"Give me recent data"

Okay. Here's the data, with a link. 

"Ummmm. That's qualified SP"

It includes the entire 2023 season.

"Not good enough"

😂 Billy Boxscore, an ongoing embarrassment. 

The idea that you can’t and don’t understand what I’m saying is not surprising.

You can go back to staring at your Povich poster that is on your ceiling 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I remember seeing him in that age 20 season and thinking he was Christ in cleats.  Wanted to really like that guy but he made it impossible. Hell of a player. I don’t care about the PEDs like I used to but he was amazing without the juice. 
    • Yep.  All of it was part of MLB’s decision that scoring runs was more important and would bring more people, so they overlooked things and “helped the players cheat” in different ways and then they turn around and vilify the players because it tarnishes their precious records…records held by players who also took PEDs. The whole thing is a joke.
    • Santander has an OPS+ of 128 and a wRC+ of 125. In other words, at or near his career peak, and better than Cal or Brooks' career marks. A 128 OPS+ would be Nick Markakis' second-best offensive season. MLB overall batting average this year is .242, 5th-lowest of all time. League OBP of .311 is in the bottom 15% since 1900. And while slugging will probably inch up through the summer, the current mark of .393 is lower than any season since 1992. My guess is that they juice the ball next year, since the shift ban hasn't really had much of an overall effect. Even if it's revived a few careers like Ryan O'Hearn's.
    • Just as importantly they used baseballs where they'd replaced the cushioned cork center with Flubber. There's almost no way that sometime in early 1993 the entire league suddenly decided to use industrial quantities of 'roids AND started to work out like madmen so they'd take effect. In 1992 the majors scored just over four runs a game, and by mid-1993 it was about five. Not to rehash that entire argument for the 10,000th time...
    • I tend to doubt Pitt trades Keller but I think Bednar could be on the board. He hasn’t even the lights out guy so far that he has been in the past. Mountcastle and other make them a better offense and perhaps team right now.
    • Because I believe how it works is they project FIP and then adjust based on team defense and park factors to project ERA. Since we’re talking about a trade, the context-specific elements of defense and park factors are less relevant. The projections have been shown to be more highly correlated with future performance than ERA or ERA estimators such as FIP.  
    • Wait …what . Cedric has hit for .271 and .290 in his career. And I could also live with the .258 he hit a couple seasons ago.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...