Jump to content

Fangraphs Analysis on Holliday Demotion


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/occams-razor-and-jackson-hollidays-demotion/

I thought this was a very interesting analysis on the decision to keep Holliday down.

This quote in the article summed it up for me:

Quote

Whatever Baltimore is doing, it’s strange in my eyes.

I would be shocked if ME and SigBot3000(tm) have not thought this all the way through. In thee I trust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NashLumber said:

Easy to follow at first, but then I got lost in the weeds. Maybe someone else will have a clearer interpretation. Thanks for this, though. 

Yea, for a piece with Occam's Razor in the title it isn't the simplest explanation.

The gist I got from it was "I did a lot of math and couldn't figure out why they did it".

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yea, for a piece with Occam's Razor in the title it isn't the simplest explanation.

The gist I got from it was "I did a lot of math and couldn't figure out why they did it".

The part where he thought that Elias is trying to thread the needle, ie. get him up here long enough to help the team win, yet not have the other service time issues (2nd in ROY nor 172 days) kick in, may be what's happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Yea, for a piece with Occam's Razor in the title it isn't the simplest explanation.

The gist I got from it was "I did a lot of math and couldn't figure out why they did it".

Of course not.  Because by the numbers and by any reasonable logic, the only REAL reason why they did it was for service time issues, and nothing really to do with talent or ability.  Again, they of course are saying its to face more good LH pitching (which really isn't in the AAA level) or to work on his defense, but it's just GM speak.  Just as it was GM speak when Elias was blowing smoke up the OH collective rears when talking about how good his chances were to make the team.  I really like Elias and appreciate all he has done.  But he's made some blunders too and right now has us in a position where we have a wealth of riches, but seems unable or unwilling to do anything to clear the logjam.  Going to be an interesting couple next years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NashLumber said:

The part where he thought that Elias is trying to thread the needle, ie. get him up here long enough to help the team win, yet not have the other service time issues (2nd in ROY nor 172 days) kick in, may be what's happening. 

I could see a super confident exec trying that...if they hadn't been burned two years ago.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NashLumber said:

Easy to follow at first, but then I got lost in the weeds. Maybe someone else will have a clearer interpretation. Thanks for this, though. 

Basically, the value lost by not having Holliday for 10%-25% of the season, plus the value gained if he's good enough to acquire the pick, don't outweigh the cost savings from having him gain the year of service time versus Super 2 status. Part of the analysis is that if he's not good enough to earn the top-2 ROY vote, then you can always send him down mid-season anyway because he's probably not instrumental in helping the team to the playoffs. Also, given the competition for ROY voting, Clemens' model shows taking Holliday from 600 PA to 450 PA only reduces his chances of placing top-2 in ROY voting from 43% to 36%. Not much of an impact to lose 25% of the season.

I think the one flaw with the analysis is that the year of control isn't just about the $ amount. The year itself is in many ways more important than how much you're paying for the year.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

Basically, the value lost by not having Holliday for 10%-25% of the season, plus the value gained if he's good enough to acquire the pick, don't outweigh the cost savings from having him gain the year of service time versus Super 2 status. Part of the analysis is that if he's not good enough to earn the top-2 ROY vote, then you can always send him down mid-season anyway because he's probably not instrumental in helping the team to the playoffs. Also, given the competition for ROY voting, Clemens' model shows taking Holliday from 600 PA to 450 PA only reduces his chances of placing top-2 in ROY voting from 43% to 36%. Not much of an impact to lose 25% of the season.

I think the one flaw with the analysis is that the year of control isn't just about the $ amount. The year itself is in many ways more important than how much you're paying for the year.

I got that far. I think it was just the second or third chart that melted my lobes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I could see a super confident exec trying that...if they hadn't been burned two years ago.

If Elias believes in that as a strategy that can work, I don't think he'd move off it just because of what happened with Rutschman (which was at least partially caused by his injury, anyway). A process over results thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Spy Fox said:

If Elias believes in that as a strategy that can work, I don't think he'd move off it just because of what happened with Rutschman (which was at least partially caused by his injury, anyway). A process over results thing. 

That's an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ThisIsBirdland said:

I think the one flaw with the analysis is that the year of control isn't just about the $ amount. The year itself is in many ways more important than how much you're paying for the year.

This

Edited by Say O!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That's an opinion.

Whether or not Rutschman's injury delay was manipulation, my point is that Elias doesn't seem like the type to change approach just because the first roll of the dice didn't go his way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, interloper said:

Guy can't figure it out because the decision is not based around service time or ROTY. It's just about reps at 2B. It's really not complicated. The complications arise when folks assume Elias is lying. 

Mateo had 45 games in center field, 38 of them starts, over his 12 seasons of professional baseball before the O's put him out there.

 

Edited by Can_of_corn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Lots of panic around here right now. Guys forget the Rangers were third in their division and only had 88 wins last season.
    • This is my favorite Basallo clip so far. The swing is so fluid, it looks so effortless and the ball is just absolutely destroyed. It reminds me of homers by prime Chris Davis.
    • The Orioles were bound to hit a rut. Get your hand off the panic button.    The Orioles aren’t signing Bauer. So just Fudget about him. The don’t need to trade Holliday and Kjerstad. I’m okay if he finds a guy worth paying a top guy return along with a few others ala Kirby, Gilbert, Castillo etc.   Stop patting yourself on the back. We lost as did everyone else to a hot Rangers team. We are still 7 up in the top wildcard slot. And as Texas proved is all you have to do is get in to have a shot. 
    • It’s becoming unglued?  Because of losing streak that almost every team goes through in any given season?  Really?     
    • The Os pen isn’t good. With DC out, they just don’t have any arms you want to rely on. They don’t miss a lot of bats, don’t get a lot of Ks and the walk rate is higher than you want it to be. Kimbrel is fine but nothing special. He has been exactly what I thought he would be and maybe even a little better than that but hes not what we had last year, which was special. Cano is better than a dime a dozen guy but not by a ton.    Baker looks good and maybe he’s poised to have the year some of us thought he would have in 2023 but he has a ways to go to prove that.
    • Yes, I bolded that part to indicate that was to what I was referring.
    • This group hasn’t burned you though. This is the biggest test for Elias since the team got good. The bottom line is the Os need pitching help and they have too much talent in the minors and too many subpar guys in the majors eating up at bats. You built this farm system up and are so proud of it and now it’s time to use it to its full potential.    I understand the Holliday injury likely sets him back until after the AS break, at least but assuming he’s hitting (which he has been or he’s been walking a ton) and once he is able to start throwing pain free, he needs to be up here.  Mayo needs to be up here yesterday.  It’s just time.  Sitting on ML ready top 10 prospects when below average MLers are playing in front of them just doesn’t make sense. You have a glaring weakness of too many lefties and a manager/GM that just won’t play lefties vs lefties. You have McCann playing way too much. Mayo needs to be up here right now. And then you need to use the rest of the system(and maybe ML team), not Basallo, and go get the pitching you need.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...