Jump to content

Brandon Hyde 2024


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, LGOrioles said:

And full stop, losing this series, especially without winning a game, is completely indefensible. Last year they had the layoff excuse, the lack of playoff experience excuse, and the fact that the Rangers ended up winning it all. This year, there is zero excuse. The Royals might be the worst team to make the playoffs this year. They have one good position player. Only Detroit has a lower wRC+ among playoff teams. Their pitching is good, but is only tied for 6th/7th among the 12 playoff teams in ERA. It’s nothing special - this is the type of pitching you will see if you want to go anywhere in the playoffs. Their core also has little to no playoff experience. They were awful the last month of the season. They’re a .500 team that happened to play in the White Sox division and took full advantage of it. 

Hyde can’t be blamed for a lot of their problems, but his team is 0-4 in playoff games while getting out scored 22-11. They’re a game away from making that 0-5 and losing to an 86 win, much less talented team. Results matter.

So a different manager would be the difference in them winning and losing these playoff games?  Cole Ragans would have allowed a couple of runs today with another Oriole manager?  I don’t know what is going to happen tomorrow but having a different manager isn’t going to change the results.  Brandon Hyde will be the manager of the Orioles win or lose tomorrow or however the playoffs end.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LGOrioles said:

It also seemed questionable to PH Kjerstad for Urias there. Ramon has been one of their best hitters the last 2 months. Kjerstad has more power potential but Erceg doesn’t give up HR’s. Having a strikeout prone batter PH for his first playoff appearance against a high strikeout reliever ended up predictably with… a strikeout. Erceg doesn’t have huge LH/RH splits in terms of his K/BB rate and Ramon hits RHP’s fine. 

If you’re splitting hairs with Urias/Kjerstad there, McCann needed to be PH for in the 5th after watching his 3rd inning AB (where he should have been bunting).

 

 

 

Yes, I was very dismayed by the decision to pinchhit for Urías. One of my few complaints about Hyde is the automatic matching up that ignores reverse splits and details of the pitcher's actual record (such as the extremely low number of home runs Erceg yields).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Yes, I was very dismayed by the decision to pinchhit for Urías. One of my few complaints about Hyde is the automatic matching up that ignores reverse splits and details of the pitcher's actual record (such as the extremely low number of home runs Erceg yields).

Urias has traditional splits this year and a double ties the game. I would have a slight preference in that situation given Erceg's splits but it is very slight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

They were saving him to replace Kjerstad for defense IMO. I think the calculation was they weren't going to run themselves out of an inning, so Holliday's slight speed advantage was less likely to make a difference than moving Santander out of position. I think you are missing that O'Hearn has above average speed so there is very little advantage unless you are planning to steal.

He still would’ve been in for defense. And Slater would’ve been in for Kjerstad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, waroriole said:

He still would’ve been in for defense. And Slater would’ve been in for Kjerstad. 

Kjerstad pinch hit for Urias though. By not pinch running, O'Hearn is able to stay at 1B, Holliday comes in to 2B, Westburg to 3B. It's possible that O'Hearn's speed costs us the game but it's also possible we lose due to Santander at 1B or having Holliday and Slater stuck in the lineup. As it turned out it didn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

Kjerstad pinch hit for Urias though. By not pinch running, O'Hearn is able to stay at 1B, Holliday comes in to 2B, Westburg to 3B. It's possible that O'Hearn's speed costs us the game but it's also possible we lose due to Santander at 1B or having Holliday and Slater stuck in the lineup. As it turned out it didn't matter.

If Santander’s defense costed us, that means we would have been in extra innings.  That’s better than not being in extra innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, accinfo said:

So a different manager would be the difference in them winning and losing these playoff games?  Cole Ragans would have allowed a couple of runs today with another Oriole manager?  I don’t know what is going to happen tomorrow but having a different manager isn’t going to change the results.  Brandon Hyde will be the manager of the Orioles win or lose tomorrow or however the playoffs end.  

A loss today would make two straight sweeps in the postseason. 0-5 in the postseason speaks for itself. Hyde can’t can’t win the games himself, but that record isn’t acceptable. If you think it is, just give him a lifetime contract then and let him coach in Baltimore the next 30 years since a manager doesn’t make a difference in winning or losing games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Kjerstad pinch hit for Urias though. By not pinch running, O'Hearn is able to stay at 1B, Holliday comes in to 2B, Westburg to 3B. It's possible that O'Hearn's speed costs us the game but it's also possible we lose due to Santander at 1B or having Holliday and Slater stuck in the lineup. As it turned out it didn't matter.

You don’t have to twist yourself into a pretzel to defend Hyde. If Santander’s defense costs us, it means we got to extra innings and pinch running for OHearn was the right call. Also, are you really trying to say that OHearn is so valuable a defender at 1B that we couldn’t stand to lose that glove in extras? I doubt he’s even better than Santander. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Is Adley better offensively than McCann right now?
    • He 100% admired it, but I agree that there was no way he was getting a triple off that even had he put his head down and sprinted. Pham played it perfectly and Mullins had to slide into 2nd. Now, had it gotten away from Pham or he misplayed it and Mullins had rounded second and decided to stay, then there could be an "uproar" but in the end, that was a Camden Yards double all the way.
    • You are really missing the point. It has nothing to do with him being up at the plate thinking of her. It’s off field stuff..is he working out as much? Is he watching tape as much? Is he working on his approach enough?    In other words, is the preparation where it should be because of the new distraction. Sorry but this stuff happens all the time. Players have off field issues, good or bad, that affect them on the field.    And I’m not even saying this is definitely the case. But if he is healthy and has just been bad for this long, there are issues at hand. Unless you think he just went from being really good to washed up in a week, it’s fair to look at all things and a newer relationship off the field is absolutely one of the things you would look at as at least a possibility of why things aren’t where we want them to be.  
    • Something has gone terribly wrong with Adley.  Injury?  I don't know.  What I do know is he looks like a shell of his former self.
    • I don't think Adley's up there at the plate and having terrible at bats because he's thinking about his girlfriend.   I think the whole Instagram video of him and his girlfriend was stupid and I'm not sure if that's something they're doing on the regular.  But also, I'm not about to critique a player for how they spend their time (aside from saying it was stupid) off the field.  I mean, he can make Instagram reels all day long after games with his girlfriend if he wants to, I really don't care.  The same way that Cowser and Gunnar are playing with Legos or guys play video games, whatever.  These are guys in their mid 20s with a decent amount of time on their hands when they're not at the ballpark, they're going to find things to do including playing with Legos and hanging out with girls. It's a silly take because we can't extol the virtues ("he's a great leader!  he's not the MVP of the team, but he's arguably their most indispensable player!) of Adley and then turn right around and wonder if he's distracted by a girlfriend which would be essentially calling him a mental midget right after saying he's a great leader.  If you're saying he's a great leader one minute but then saying he could be distracted by a girlfriend then he was probably not a great leader to begin with.   Blaming the woman is a borderline conspiracy theory.  It's based on emotion, not facts.  It's based on uncertainty, fear (in this case, how could our franchise catcher be so bad all of a sudden if he's not hurt?!?!) and trying to prescribe a reason for the uncertainty. The good news for your argument is that there's no way to disprove it.  On the flip side of that coin, there's no way to prove it, either.  So the misinformation that you're bringing up about Adley's girlfriend causing his .179 batting average since June can never be falsified in your view but I can also call it silly.    
    • I buy the chase rate. They could have had several walks.  Now, the ump was inconsistent and it caused them to chase at times. The borderline pitches I get. But there were a lot of pitchers that weren’t borderline that they looked awful on.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...