Jump to content

Is the 2024 team better than 2023’s?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, One eyed Bird said:

Back end of the pen I will keep us from being a better team this year vs last, if we still had the Mountain closing games than yes without a doubt

We have the best ammunition of any contending team to make any trade that we want/need to fix the closer position (when the time comes).

Right now, we can still succeed despite Kimbrel mainly because of the now quality starting pitching. Any of our 5/6 guys is capable of giving us 7 innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

I’m not saying you’re wrong, and given age and salary, I hope you’re right, but Hays has only 24 ABs in LF, to Cowser’s 44. That’s way too few attempts to conclusively say. Cowser is marginally faster and has a stronger arm, but I couldn’t find a stat on jumps, route quality,accuracy, so Hays may make up for being a fraction slower if he’s better in those.

 

Cowser certainly hits better at the moment.

 

The way Cowser has hit for 3 weeks is about as bad as Hays. He certainly hit better for the first 3 weeks. He's not hitting anything now and hasn't in a long time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pen's general flakiness is really exaggerated by their failings in just a few games. We can't ignore those games and pretend they never happened, but there have been plenty of examples of the bullpen's success.

We have a decent core in the pen, but I think Kimbrel's chances are running out, and if he doesn't have it, he needs to go somewhere or lose his closer spot and get relegated to a cleanup man. Better to have Cano just close the 9th than to watch Kimbrel almost blow it, then have Cano come in to bail him out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Frobby said:

Thought about it, but it’s really hard to judge defense based on 33 games.  Overall I think it’s close to a wash.   What do you think?

C, 1B, SS, and RF = bump

2B Mateo/Westburg > Frazier

3B Westburg > Urias

CF healthy Mullins > dinged up Mullins

LF Cowser seems like more range than Hays.  

Another category is the bench.  That's a tougher read because of RIP strategy and how 2023 maximized the matchups. Gunnar took a while but showed things.  Hicks and O'Hearn were gems.  2024 bench has Westburg graduated and Cowser flashing his upside plus a good defense.  O'Hearn has built on his success and is now a trusted strong side platoon.  Mateo was a bench guy coming in and is now performing (fingers crossed).  Last year we were tossing vets against the wall to see what sticks.  This year we're tossing the young talent against the wall.

Bullpen feels more balanced vs Bautista/Cano dominated.  TBD...

Rotation is more trustworthy.  Each have some questions but the floor feels much more stable because of the depth.

We knew the offense was going to score.  And we still haven't really gotten many hard hits from our #4.  But to balance it out we've had a couple going nuts with not much history before it.  Only real surprise is less BBs to do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, dzorange said:

+31 run differential on 5-5-23. +55 run differential on 5-5-24.

Of course I’m posting this strategically coming off of back-to-back series wins and a 11-1 win.

Another stat - there are six teams in the MLB that have a winning record against teams above .500:

Orioles: 14-5

Dodgers: 10-5

Yankees: 8-5

Guardians: 11-7

Rangers: 11-8

Cubs: 8-7

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, dzorange said:

Another stat - there are six teams in the MLB that have a winning record against teams above .500:

Orioles: 14-5

Dodgers: 10-5

Yankees: 8-5

Guardians: 11-7

Rangers: 11-8

Cubs: 8-7

 

Surprised the Braves and Phillies aren't on there I guess they've been beating up on weak teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dzorange said:

Another stat - there are six teams in the MLB that have a winning record against teams above .500:

Orioles: 14-5

Dodgers: 10-5

Yankees: 8-5

Guardians: 11-7

Rangers: 11-8

Cubs: 8-7

 

So then they are 9-6 against teams under .500. That needs to improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Surprised the Braves and Phillies aren't on there I guess they've been beating up on weak teams.

The Phillies have played a whopping 6 games against teams above .500, and have a 3-3 record against them.

Edited by dzorange
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, dzorange said:

The Phillies have played a whopping 6 games against teams above .500, and have a 3-3 record against them.

I just looked thru their record a while ago.  Series against the Nats (2), White Sox, Marlins, Cardinals, Rockies and Angels makes their record of 1 win better than the O's way less impressive.  Their schedule coming up must be hell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Malike said:

So then they are 9-6 against teams under .500. That needs to improve.

Somehow feels typical of Orioles to play up to the competition, and get burned by the pretenders... same with individual starting pitchers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Agreed they were one reliever short I thought even with Baumann(even though I don’t trust him much), now with Viera they are 2 guys short.  That was a downgrade though they must think they can get him fixed enough to have him help out later on.  Perez has pitched well so that is a big help but still another guy is needed for times like today.  I do think they might add Lopez if they can claim him on waivers who is better option then Viera imo.  
    • I have no problem going reliever at #22 if he profiles as a dominant reliever.  Sounds like Massey can be gotten later but I’d have no problem going for Brody Brecht with one of those first two picks.  Again, I prefer Gillen or Lindsey at #22.  Be great if we could get one at #22 and the other at #32.        Who do you consider high upside that might be there at #32?
    • Looking for bright spots from today’s game, Hays hit three balls on the screws, 102, 104 and 106, two of which went for hits.  His BA is creeping towards the Mendoza line, now at .190. He’s hitting .294 since coming off the IL.  
    • At this point, after seeing this game and about 3 other games lost this year, I have come around to the fact that the O's are going to have to trade for a shut down 7th and 8th inning guy.   I think that is all they need. But for now they are that ONE guy short of having a BP that can win a WS this year.
    • That’s absolutely part of the recipe. 
    • If Basallo goes off in the second half we have an outside shot for 4 #1 prospects 4 years in a row.  I’d say that’s elite.  The Latin players he signed in his first year are now 19 & 20 and just getting into full-season ball.  They have also hit on a lot of trades (Brandish, Cano, Povich, McDermott) and will continue to supplement the pipeline through additional trades.  Etzel, Fabian, EBJ, Horvath could all turn the dial up a notch or 2 and become big time prospects.  
    • I agree, but I think the bigger issue is having a tired bullpen and still having Viera on the team.  Elias need to give Hyde better options.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...