-
Who's Online 50 Members, 0 Anonymous, 170 Guests (See full list)
- Philip
- Bird Lady
- Dunk35
- yeoledugger
- TradeAngelos
- jamesenoch
- throttleplate
- casadeozo
- DirtyBird
- webbrick2010
- Jammer7
- Aglets
- Chavez Ravine
- Rbiggs2525
- Triple Crown
- ORIOLE33
- OsFanInOhio
- Mendoza Line
- royalstillman
- e16bball
- clapdiddy
- OriolesMagic83
- bpilktree
- mcpd
- Paul in Virginia
- WV O's
- Say O!
- Can_of_corn
- Orioles0615
- TopGunnar
- pvitek
- kaj21206
- interloper
- forphase1
- EricK
- Bemorewins
- vab
- nvpacchi
- Frobby
- MurphDogg
- StillanOfan
- OsFanSinceThe80s
- Warehouse
- Ohfan67
- dystopia
- Sovaosfan
- Cokeman
- thegardner
- Fuzzball22
- frankwhite
-
Posts
-
Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed. No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy. -
By OsFanInOhio · Posted
I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top -
By Bemorewins · Posted
They are not in a rebuild. And I don't want to waste time imagining that the team is bad and trading our best young players. As a matter of fact, I hope we don't have to do that for years to come. I envision adding good players not how can we get rid of the good ones that we have. I have waited my whole life to finally have a team this good. I don't mind at all trading good prospects. And have no delusional expectations that we can get value without surrendering value. Nor am I in love with the notion that we have to have a cheap, homegrown team. As a matter of fact, I want and expect the org to spend much more money on payroll than it is doing currently. Lastly, what happened with Gausman is in the past and under a totally different administration (ownership + front office). We were selling then. We are buying now. -
-
By OsFanInOhio · Posted
Is there a reason it should be? He’s still walking 5.5+ batters per 9. He’s still got things he can work on. No rush to get him up unless it’s as a reliever down the stretch or a spot start. -
By Bemorewins · Posted
I mean Tanner Scott at least has a Major League track record. How much do you think Scott will really cost? Also, we have more position players and prospects that we could ever use. I understand maybe not wanting Scott, but I don't understand the logic of not wanting surrender any prospects (even some good ones). We almost have to at some point. Otherwise, you have 25 year old top level prospects like Kjerstad, who is in his prime now and killing it at AAA but has no place on the Big League roster. Stowers is even older and has contributed relatively nothing to the Orioles and is now age 26. -
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.