Jump to content

Saturday 6/1 vs the Devil Rays with Bradish on the mound.


Recommended Posts

Just now, Morgan423 said:

I mean, Cash did have a point.  People in the dugout can't see inside/outside very well in real time, but they can definitely see up and down, and they know when you ring up one of their players on an armpit-high fastball.

I'm pretty tired of it, honestly.  It's past time for robo-umps. 

But if we had robo umps it was a strike.

image.png.fc83b802be543c602f86f1ea8a8a4d02.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, emmett16 said:

I didn’t like how he was shaking his hand and squeezing/flexing his fist.  Looked like he was felt something being a little off.  Will be curious to see what he says after the game. 

Was he ever shaking his pitching arm?  We really need for him to not be injured.  If Bradish goes down I can see the Orioles nearing desperate places.  Maybe selling one or multiple prospects for a starter.  

Anything to avoid that would be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gurgi said:

Next week he probably gets tommy john.  Its what we do.

It's what a ton of pitchers in baseball have been doing.  Throwing 110% every pitch, every game doesn't seem to be sustainable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, Malike said:

But if we had robo umps it was a strike.

image.png.fc83b802be543c602f86f1ea8a8a4d02.png

That wasn't the pitch he got tossed for.  Cash was arguing the 0-0 pitch that got called a strike 4 inches above the zone.

Edited by Morgan423
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SteveA said:

Our pitcher gave up some runs so you have to generalize to this, like it's some characteristic of our team?

When was the last time we had "early inning prosperity" and gave it back?

We are winning 65% of our games and our offense is scoring among the top five  in MLB in runs per game.   Yet we hear so many of these generalized statements about how we can't hit, we can't handle prosperty, we always give runs back after we score, we always do this wrong, we always do that wrong.

It's all such utter BS.   If we were making a habit of doing all the things wrong all the time that the whiners and crybabies constantly cry about, there is NO WAY we would be on a 105 win pace or one of the highest scoring teams in MLB.   It would be impossible.

Do we do those things on occasion?   Sure, every team does.   Every team has a scoring drought   Every team occasionally gets a lead and gives it back.   Every other team strands runners on 3rd with less than two outs now and then.

But there is NO WAY we are worse at all those things than most teams.   There is NO WAY those things can be endemic problems for us rather than just things that happen occasionally to us like every MLB team.  Because if they were, we would not have the record we do.

I agree that some of these things are not fair subjects for criticism or hand-wringing. But it is my impression that the Orioles, for one of the top teams in MLB, rarely get off to a big lead in the first few innings and, when they do, often (again for a very good team) give all or most of it up. 

I don't accept your logic, as I understand it, that because the Orioles have an outstanding won-loss record (just slightly above their simple Pythagorean expectation), they can't be not-so-good at anything.  A very good team can be mediocre or bad at some things. I think the Orioles are not very good at this one, and I said so without researching the accuracy of my observation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, justD said:

I wouldn’t because we don’t have anyone named “Viera.”

I probably would’ve unfortunately had to name someone for the third.

But it wouldn’t be Vieira for that either. 

That made me laugh, the day we picked him up I asked in a thread somewhere whether we were going to have him long enough for us to need to learn how to spell his name.

I guess the answer was yes, ha ha

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, accinfo said:

Isn't against the rules to be this sensible on the game thread?😄

Poor Steve tries to get this point across every, idk, three games or so? It’s gotta really get under his skin. But I don’t think he’ll ever change the tone of ranting we have in the game threads 😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

He’s cooked.  

Yup.   I know the feeling.  Some days it just isn't your day.  Bradish had nothing.  Velocity was still good so not too worried.  

You can usually feel it when you wake up.   Everything is off. 

Funny how 'cooked' has become a word that all the social media influencers are using lately.  I watch a lot of you tube golf videos and one of my favorites is Taco Golf (he is from New Zealand) and Luke Kwon...who is American.  But both have Korean heritage.  Anyway last year they started to use the word 'cooked' when they hit a shot that ended up in a terrible spot and I remember thinking it was odd that they were using that because I hadn't see that word used since I was a kid.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • The O's would have Crochet thru 2026.  They could also give him the Gray Rod rest treatment and then pitch him out of the pen until September. 
    • I mean this take is fairly reasonable and I sympathize with your frustration in this discussion. He's not putting up superhuman numbers. He's putting up good numbers that are trending up, and factoring in his age and position, it's pretty exciting. But like Frobby said, he's not untouchable, it's just that it seems unlikely there's a trade fit for him because it would cost the other team someone equally as exciting, with years of control, and who is ML ready. Those guys just don't exist much on the trade market. 
    • I hear you but everything seems kind of moot if Crochet and his agent want him on an innings limit. Even if they don't, I doubt Elias would throw caution to the wind like that and abuse the guy's arm. So it seems unlikely Elias would give the White Sox SP-level prospects for a guy they'd be forced to use in the bullpen. 
    • I'm thinking there is a good chance Elias makes a strong play for Crochet.  Hear me out before I get drowned out in a chorus of boos.  It seems that Westburg, Mayo, and Holliday can not co exist on the same team.  Too many bodies not enough positions.  That's not even accounting for Basallo (is he more of a 1B/DH) and Kjerstad (same).  Imo, it's better to solve the backlog of prospects before it becomes obvious and the O's hand is forced and the O's have to accept supoptimal value.  There's this little problem of the O's very obvious lack of pitching depth.  O's #1 is Burnes, #2 is Gray Rod, #3 is ??, #4 is ??, #5 is ??.  Yeah I know Suarez, Povich, Irvin and probably Kremer go in there but that's not really a desirable mix.  Crochet pitched another strong 7 innings with 11 K's last night.  He only threw 88 pitches.   His stuff is off the charts.  Statcast has more red than a Freddy Krugger movie.  Makes the O's rotation probably the best in a short series and one of the best in a longer series.  I know Elias is losing sleep over getting this kind of elite talent.  I keep thinking it's better to get a lesser pitcher  and keep the prospects but then I think the goal is winning and as someone said "there is no way the O's can ruin the farm in one deal".  It doesn't matter what I think, is Elias making a bet on this year and trading a guy he thinks he might not have a position for? 
    • Then look it up yourself and try to understand. Why does everyone else have to explain it to you?
    • Different spring, different sprain. Same unfortunate result.  I wonder the same year return rate of a “partial UCL tear” as Bautista had. 
    • Ugh. I DID. lol. The only reason I even looked at 2 weeks in the first place was because another poster took issue with me referencing his 2024 stat line. So many of you want to argue simply for the sake of arguing....gets pretty nutty.  
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...