Jump to content

Pick your 40 man roster (protect list) for Nov 20th.


wildcard

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sure.

But why extend him instead of just waiting?

Why use an off-season 40 man roster space on McCann?

How is that a good idea?

You have a point unless Elias does not want to risk losing him.    Maybe they could have hand shake agreement to keep a roster spot open.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Why not?   You got inside info?

Because, we have a guy who was a fairly early draft pick and has been developed in the system and a guy who we traded Baumann for. Both would be league minimum. And Adley isn’t a rookie anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Because, we have a guy who was a fairly early draft pick and has been developed in the system and a guy who we traded Baumann for. Both would be league minimum. And Adley isn’t a rookie anymore.

Who was a fairly early draft pick?   We got whatever we could for Bauman instead of nothing.  McCann will be first choice if he's willing to accept their one year modest contract. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Who was a fairly early draft pick?   We got whatever we could for Bauman instead of nothing.  McCann will be first choice if he's willing to accept their one year modest contract. 

Handley was a 6th round pick and $250k signing. That is fairly early.

And you think the only offer for Baumann just happened to be a AAA catcher?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Handley was a 6th round pick and $250k signing. That is fairly early.

And you think the only offer for Baumann just happened to be a AAA catcher?

So, what does being a 6th round pick have to do with next year?   I think Seattle was one of the few teams offering anything for Baumann  and Hunt was the best we could do.   He has options so it was more about having depth down in Norfolk next year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Strowd, Hunt, McGough, and Tavera will not be put on the 40 man and will be eligible for the rule 5 or minor league FA if they qualify.   Mullins and Hays are both non tender candidates.   They will not be tendered and then traded.  If either is tendered they're staying.    Isn't Coulombe a FA this year?

Cook, Johnson, and Heid could be added, none of them could be added, or some could be added.   All three will  not.

That is all.

Hunt is already on the 40-man. Coulombe has an option for next year.

And Strowd’s AAA ERA performance doesn’t warrant it yet, but I’m still a believer in the stuff. By the end of the season I think he’ll have a spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

O's have an option on O'Hearn for next year at 7.5m.   I think Elias picks up the option.   Then he might trade him to make room for Mayo.

If D. Johnson does not get called up this year they have an option on him next year.   I am guessing they may put him on the 40 man roster to add OF depth because he has been doing so well.   Really just a guess.

You may have a point on Davidson if he keeps doing well.

I want to give Santander the QO. I want the draft pick, but if he takes it I also think he is worth the $20M.

I like O'Hearn but he does only one thing well, which is hit RHP. Meanwhile, he is blocking Kjerstad outright and also complicates things for Mayo. 

Will we get to see what happens with Santander before making the call on O'Hearn's option? I would want O'Hearn back only if we are certain that Santander is gone. 

Anyway, we have already discussed most of the vets in other threads. Of the young guys on your "probably not protected" list, Pham is perhaps the most interesting to me. He has a high ERA this year and the walks are pretty bad, but the K's are improved. I could see a team taking a chance on him as a bullpen piece. If we lose Vespi, I could see Pham as a taxi squad guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

And Strowd’s AAA ERA performance doesn’t warrant it yet, but I’m still a believer in the stuff. By the end of the season I think he’ll have a spot.

Strowd has had a bad run of too many walks and loud contact in AAA, terrible BABIP and HR/FB. But he’s still missing bats at an elite rate. Strowd’s AAA z-Contact % is 69.5%. Mason Miller’s z-Contact % is 70.0%. Strowd’s got the type of arm that is long gone in the Rule 5 if not protected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

He made his MLB debut in 2021. He was also optioned in 2022. He’s out of options after this year. 

Baker did not pitch any games in the minors in 2022 which he would have if he was optioned.   His game log in 2022 does not show a break because of being optioned.

If you have a link that shows he was optioned in 2022 please post it.

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

lol about to start a series with the Yankees that could have us in first place by Thursday and wildcard is starting threads about November. 

My thread is really about who Elias may trade before the trade deadline at the end of July.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

Bakers did not pitch any games in the minors in 2022 which he would have if he was optioned.   His game log in 2022 does not show a break because of being optioned.

If you have a link that shows he was optioned in 2022 please post it.

You’re right, he was not optioned in 2022, but he was first optioned September 8, 2021 by the Blue Jays. It’s in the extra rows of latest transactions on his player page: https://www.mlb.com/player/bryan-baker-641329

I use the Roster Resource page on Fangraphs, which shows he’s on his last option this year: https://www.fangraphs.com/roster-resource/depth-charts/orioles

I initially didn’t check when he was first optioned, just assumed it was 2022, but turns out it was 2021. Regardless, he’ll be out of options next year. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's low hanging fruit to laugh at the doom-and-gloom crowd, the sky-is-falling Chicken Littles, and the run-for-the-hills Billies.  So, fruit duly plucked. 🤣 However, there is some truth within their pessimistic outlook.  It's absolutely fair to be concerned about our pitching.  Who's to say who is right or wrong in how much concern there should be?  Well, we all have a say.  It's why we're here.  The beloved @Roy Firestone is admittedly the most pessimistic Game Thread poster in history, yet no one questions his love of the O's.  Nor should we berate those with strongly pessimistic views about our chances as being less of a fan.   It's just my two cents, but I think it's readily apparent that we need to add to our pitching and I believe Elias will address it.  A quality starter and a reliever or two would likely do wonders for the team... and our collective sanity.   I just don't feel we'd need to deal Holliday, or Mayo, or Basallo to get there.  Then again, I may be wrong.  
    • Who are the Os top three? Burnes, GRod, and…….?
    • There never is going to be an “all in” year.   Elias made the mostly in move by getting Burnes and then the baseball gods decided to cut down Bradish, Means, and Wells.  Coulombe too.  The Dodgers are “all in” every single year.  1 WS trophy in a shortened season. Elias is going to make some moves but he’s not dipping into the top 3 prospects and maybe not even Kjerstad.   You can’t make a habit of trading guys with 6+ years of control for players with minimal amounts of control.  Yeah, this was the Burnes year and we got some bad luck.  Maybe we can still piece it together but Elias is only going to do that up to a point. As far as next year, who knows.  
    • I don't disagree at all.  I just put a much stronger emphasis on the top two guys in a series instead of three.  In most five game series your third starter will only pitch once.  Win the division and Kremer may make only 4 postseason starts even as our #3 all the way through the World Series.  That's why I would be focused on bullpen arms instead of a starter.  I love the idea of a starter with years of control to help offset the loss of Burnes to FA but I just don't see anyone that attractive that will be available.  This team's path through the AL is to have Burnes and Rodriguez be aces and the lineup to continue to be the best in the league regardless of who the third or fourth starters are.  
    • Your comment basically confirms what I said. You admit that Suarez and Irwin would regress, which they have. As a result of that regression, they are no longer reliable members of a powerful rotation. Therefore, we will slowly sink unless Mike gets someone better, and not just one, either. How is it an irrational fear to say we will slowly sink if we don’t make acquisitions? You just agreed that Suarez and Irwin aren’t adequate, so the concern is completely valid. Add to that Kremer’s spotty performance and injury concerns, and Povich remaining a huge question mark. Outside our top two, we got nobody dependable. And that’s just discussing the starters. your comment is curious because you try to refute what I was saying but instead confirm it, and you close by admitting they “have to improve on obvious needs”  We can debate what would constitute “going overboard,” but it’s clear from his past transactions that Mike cares a lot about the price he pays for an asset, so I think, far from overpaying, he’s more likely to duplicate what he did last season.
    • More should have been done to improve the team's rotation and Bullpen in the offseason.  Since John Angelos controlled the purse strings, additional spending was just not happening.  I put that on Angelos not Elias.  Does anyone think that Elias would not have liked say $30 million to add to 2024 payroll to strengthen the pitching?  This trade deadline is a time for Rubinstein to prove himself as much as Elias.
    • The Moose hits it!!!! Anyone who sets up their expectations to world series or bust needs good strong blood pressure meds. The year we win it will probably be a year we didn't expect. I'm enjoying the O's are relavent again after way to many years in the wilderness. Get to the dance and take your chances. That's my moto.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...