Jump to content

2024 Prospect Promotion Incentive (#32): Griff O'Ferrall - SS - (Jr) Virginia (VA)


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Go_Os said:

He was 32 in Keith Law's list.

 

O’Ferrall might have ended up in the first round if he’d stuck with his swing and approach from 2023, when he hit .396/.453/.495 for the Hoos while playing strong defense at short. Instead, he tried to get all launch angle-happy and pull the ball for more power, instead of using the whole field, losing 86 points off his OBP for the sake of four extra home runs (in a year when homers are up all over the place). The swing is very forced, like he’s trying to catch the ball and lift it out to his pull side, when he’s already shown strong contact skills and has enough strength to hit for average in pro ball with plenty of doubles. He can still play above-average defense and at least continued to make contact at a high rate, striking out just 7.4 percent of the time this spring, so there’s at least some floor here for a team that takes him and tries to restore his old swing.

Based off of different rankings, he doesn’t seem like a reach. He was drafted in the appropriate area, again according to rankings.

The question is, was he the best pick for the Os?  Obviously they feel he was.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Go_Os said:

He was 32 in Keith Law's list.

 

O’Ferrall might have ended up in the first round if he’d stuck with his swing and approach from 2023, when he hit .396/.453/.495 for the Hoos while playing strong defense at short. Instead, he tried to get all launch angle-happy and pull the ball for more power, instead of using the whole field, losing 86 points off his OBP for the sake of four extra home runs (in a year when homers are up all over the place). The swing is very forced, like he’s trying to catch the ball and lift it out to his pull side, when he’s already shown strong contact skills and has enough strength to hit for average in pro ball with plenty of doubles. He can still play above-average defense and at least continued to make contact at a high rate, striking out just 7.4 percent of the time this spring, so there’s at least some floor here for a team that takes him and tries to restore his old swing.

He has him higher than Honeycutt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any Cadyn Grenier comps are not accurate for me. He has much better bat-to-ball traits. A very different body type/athlete as well. I only saw O’Ferrall a few times, but give this one some time. He is the kind of player that grows on you for all of the things he does very well.

This is not a comp, but Bryce Turang comes to mind as a similar game type. It isn’t a sexy pick, no. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This kid is a gamer. Big time baseball IQ and a stellar "character guy." He was 5'11" and 165 LBs out of high school. Now listed at 6'1" and 185 LBs on the UVa website. Word out of the Cavaliers coaching staff is that he has an "off the charts," work ethic. I like the pick at the level they got him. 

https://www.perfectgame.org/players/playerprofile.aspx?ID=656671

He also won the award for the best SS in D1 college baseball. 

"The Brooks Wallace Award is an award given by the College Baseball Foundation (CBF) to the best college baseball shortstop of the year. The award has been given annually since 2004."

Previous award recipients:

2009 Ben Orloff SS UC Irvine Senior [9]
2010 Jedd Gyorko SS West Virginia Junior [10]
2011 Brad Miller SS Clemson Junior [11]
2012 Zach Vincej SS Pepperdine Junior [12]
2013 Alex Bregman SS LSU Freshman [13]
2014 Trea Turner SS North Carolina State Junior [14]
2015 Dansby Swanson SS Vanderbilt Junior [15]
2016 Sheldon Neuse SS Oklahoma Junior [16]
2017 Logan Warmoth SS North Carolina Junior [17]
2018 Cadyn Grenier SS Oregon State Junior [18]
2019 Grae Kessinger SS Ole Miss Junior [19]
2021 Cal Conley SS Texas Tech Freshman [20]
2022 Brooks Lee SS Cal Poly Sophomore [21]
2023 Matt Shaw SS Maryland Junior

That's some pretty good players.

Edited by Jim'sKid26
added stuff
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jim'sKid26 said:

This kid is a gamer. Big time baseball IQ and a stellar "character guy." He was 5'11" and 165 LBs out of high school. Now listed at 6'1" and 185 LBs on the UVa website. Word out of the Cavaliers coaching staff is that he has an "off the charts," work ethic. I like the pick at the level they got him. 

https://www.perfectgame.org/players/playerprofile.aspx?ID=656671

He also won the award for the best SS in D1 college baseball. 

"The Brooks Wallace Award is an award given by the College Baseball Foundation (CBF) to the best college baseball shortstop of the year. The award has been given annually since 2004."

Previous award recipients:

2009 Ben Orloff SS UC Irvine Senior [9]
2010 Jedd Gyorko SS West Virginia Junior [10]
2011 Brad Miller SS Clemson Junior [11]
2012 Zach Vincej SS Pepperdine Junior [12]
2013 Alex Bregman SS LSU Freshman [13]
2014 Trea Turner SS North Carolina State Junior [14]
2015 Dansby Swanson SS Vanderbilt Junior [15]
2016 Sheldon Neuse SS Oklahoma Junior [16]
2017 Logan Warmoth SS North Carolina Junior [17]
2018 Cadyn Grenier SS Oregon State Junior [18]
2019 Grae Kessinger SS Ole Miss Junior [19]
2021 Cal Conley SS Texas Tech Freshman [20]
2022 Brooks Lee SS Cal Poly Sophomore [21]
2023 Matt Shaw SS Maryland Junior

That's some pretty good players.

I appreciate the list, but there's different profiles on it. How many of the big names were drafted really early? There were elite prospects and there were great college SS's who fell some. The latter haven't exactly torn up MLB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m sorry but using words like gamer and scrappy don’t do players justice.

It’s like when you see pics of a house that is for sale and all the pics are of the outside but nothing on the inside.  There is a reason for that..because the inside sucks.

I get the point of using some of these terms but when you say them, it takes focus off of their strengths and makes them more of the little engine that could type guy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This pick does make me wonder about CF Jackson Holliday perhaps being a thing this off-season.

O'Ferrall seems to match the low strikeout Nori Aoki, Adam Frazier kind of thing.     Gunnar would be awfully young to move off SS if O'Ferrall is Mike Bordick.

It seems like O'Ferrall's overall value can't get close to surfacing unless he defends SS, so maybe he is just draft day trade bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People that are associating picks with moving players have this draft all wrong. If you get 3 MLB contributors in a draft then you’ve had a great draft. Drafting a catcher and shortstop have nothing to do with Gunnar Henderson and Adley Rutchman. This has to do with trying to find a MLB contributor which is a very low percentage after round 1. Remember Westburg, Cowser and Kjerstad all came up at 24 years old. These kids have 3 more years of development before we will see them. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

This pick does make me wonder about CF Jackson Holliday perhaps being a thing this off-season.

O'Ferrall seems to match the low strikeout Nori Aoki, Adam Frazier kind of thing.     Gunnar would be awfully young to move off SS if O'Ferrall is Mike Bordick.

It seems like O'Ferrall's overall value can't get close to surfacing unless he defends SS, so maybe he is just draft day trade bait.

Of course you have also taken 2 true CFers the last 2 first rounds.

But they will need to figure out something, that’s for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

This pick does make me wonder about CF Jackson Holliday perhaps being a thing this off-season.

O'Ferrall seems to match the low strikeout Nori Aoki, Adam Frazier kind of thing.     Gunnar would be awfully young to move off SS if O'Ferrall is Mike Bordick.

It seems like O'Ferrall's overall value can't get close to surfacing unless he defends SS, so maybe he is just draft day trade bait.

Getting way ahead of yourself.   I would guess O’Ferrall has nothing to do where Holliday plays the next 2-3 years.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jammer7 said:

Any Cadyn Grenier comps are not accurate for me. He has much better bat-to-ball traits. A very different body type/athlete as well. I only saw O’Ferrall a few times, but give this one some time. He is the kind of player that grows on you for all of the things he does very well.

This is not a comp, but Bryce Turang comes to mind as a similar game type. It isn’t a sexy pick, no. 

The Cayden Greiner comp is a bit harsh, I'll admit.

Greiner was an excellent defensive shortstop who could really get into a ball. The problem was, he ended up with about a 30 hit tool.

O'Ferrall is kind of a reverse Greiner, but overall a better package. He's got plenty of hit tool, the question mark is power.

Greiner was a third round talent the O's drafted in supplemental first. O'Ferrall is basically a supplemental first round talent.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Rbiggs2525 said:

People that are associating picks with moving players have this draft all wrong. If you get 3 MLB contributors in a draft then you’ve had a great draft. Drafting a catcher and shortstop have nothing to do with Gunnar Henderson and Adley Rutchman. This has to do with trying to find a MLB contributor which is a very low percentage after round 1. Remember Westburg, Cowser and Kjerstad all came up at 24 years old. These kids have 3 more years of development before we will see them. 

I get the Talent Accumulation aspect - it is most of what we have watched since Elias was hired.

Kjerstad is a major outlier for medical reasons, and Jordan Westburg sits next to Ryan Mountcastle as a prominent MLBPA member who may feel like theirs and their friends' competitive capabilities were constrained due to club circumstances.

I agree 3 contributors any draft is a favorable outcome, but if on Day 1 you can't forecast a high pick as a backup catcher and 5th infielder...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is interesting that Cadyn Grenier is our go to example as a bust, when of the 10 players drafted around him (five before and five after), five never reached the Majors, three had sub-1 WAR careers to this point (Jackson Kowar, Daniel Lynch IV and Xavier Edwards), and the other two are Kris Bubic (1.8 career rWAR) and Jake McCarthy (5.0 rWAR).

The draft is such a crapshoot, and the median expectation after pick 35 or so is not to reach the Majors at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Elias overestimated Mayo’s value. A guy who strikes out a lot and has no defense is not a valuable prospect, even if he’s strong as a bear and can hit balls to the moon. I wish had been traded at peak value, and yes, I would be happy to trade Holliday, too, but his value has gone down as well
    • I think it's because Pivetta has reverse splits this year. Now, do you value his career numbers or this year...I'm not sure. But maybe SIGBOT cares about this year more maybe because of pitch mix/effectiveness can vary year to year. Who knows. Against righties: .279/.311/.514 - .825 OPS Lefties: .187/.251/.365 - .616 OPS  
    • So he has the same first 6 hitters and plays Rivera over Mayo who has hit better and is a much better defender along with playing Slater in the outfield which gives us better defense over Santander and takes McCann a light hitting catcher out of the game.  So he made an upgrade at 3rd base with how both guys are playing and flipped Slater for McCann and thus makes it an awful lineup.  It makes me laugh how much people get upset about nothing.  
    • Coulombe doesn't have righty/lefty splits. It's why he is so damn good.  Akin doesn't have righty/lefty splits this year, and he didn't last year but he was awful/hurt. He definitely did in 2022. But he stinks with runners on and in high leverage situations. Soto is super inconsistent and when he blows up he's awful. Last year he stunk against righties, but was excellent against lefties. I reckon they want him to get back to that. To me, the pecking order would be this: Coulombe and Perez for high leverage situations Akin only in for fresh innings and to give 1-2 IP. Soto I just don't trust. He had a nice stretch there for a minute, but in the end...he was pitching in mostly low leverage situations. 
    • Last night's lineup was Hyde first decent lineup in a long time, but tonight's lineup is another abysmal one from him. If Elias was going to make a dumpster dive trade for Austin Slater, I can somewhat see the logic behind strictly using Slater as a platoon player. But I definitely don't understand giving him more starts against righties. What both Elias and Hyde are saying by giving Slater opportunities is, "We don't care about stats or splits, we have a good feeling about this guy." That's it, and that's terrible roster management.  Slater has extreme favorable career splits against lefties, and the Elias apologists on this board pointed to Slater being a good platoon matchup hitter against lefties, saying he makes some sense if you believe his struggles against lefties this season would normalize closer to his career line. Yet Slater is still actually hitting better against righties this season. Ultimately, in the end, Slater is a .600 OPS hitter overall this season. Which makes him unplayable to any competent manager or GM. There was a reason Slater was available at the trade deadline for cash considerations. And it's because he sucks. Emmanuel Rivera, meanwhile, has a .597 OPS this season. Sorry, not even a gold glove 3B is worth rostering with that kind of bat. Yet Hyde continues to give Rivera at bats over a top 10 prospect who should be getting as many starts as possible to get comfortable. Unbelievable.  Slater and Rivera could each hit a home run tonight, and that still wouldn't change how terrible they are or that it's bad lineup optimization to start both of these bums. 
    • Right. Let's just be honest and say that he did a great job building the farm system through the Houston "tank" philosophy, but now must prove he can be good at building the MLB product. But yes, this trade looks dreadful at the moment. 
    • I still expect him to be a very good player.   However, I was hoping for 70 grade bat-to-ball and instead he had a 21.8% in-zone whiff % at Norfolk.  His Tides OPS was powered by a 20% walk rate which won’t stick at the big league level.  I was hoping for solid SS defense and plus 2B defense, but it looks more like solid at 2B and maybe not viable at SS. Going into the season I was hoping for perennial MVP candidate and now have tempered my outlook to occasional All-Star.  I recognize he is 20 but so are the other Jackson’s.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...