Jump to content

Quit bitchin about the pitchin


zweem

Recommended Posts

The offense is offensive. Yeah the overall offense looks good-  10runs, 11runs, 1 run , 2 runs,2 runs does not make an even 500 team. We seem to have a statistic (whole lotta runs) verses a consistent, reliable, winning offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bullpen doesn't get a pass for their performance. I will say given the current level of talent in the bullpen they're playing about as well as possible (which is mediocre).

Two relatively close games these last two nights turned into larger deficits thanks to the Orioles relievers bringing a gas can and matches to the mound. Elias should have added another bullpen arm before the start of the season. Kimbrel wasn't enough and now he looks completely washed.

Edited by OsFanSinceThe80s
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's/Elias needs to develop more pitching.  The O's are a good team now and can't grab good pitchers off the waiver wire.  The O's even with how they are playing are one of the last teams able to place claims on the waiver wire.  The O's haven't even developed hardly any relievers.  Most of the relievers the O's have had in their bullpen have been acquired in trades and off the waiver wire.  Face it our pitching development (starters and relievers) sucks.  That is a big part of the failure of the bullpen this year is that there are no pitchers in AAA ready to supplement the pen.  The pitching in Norfolk has been some of the worst in AAA other than Povich and McDermott and a couple of others.  Even with the great offense there most of the year, they have been mostly a .500 team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

The whole idea that somewhere there are teams with “consistent” offenses that average 5 runs a game and never score below 4 is a fantasy.  Here are the top 5 offenses in baseball in runs per game, and how often they have scored 5+, 4, 3, 2, 1 and 0 runs.

AZD (5.23): 65-16-14-11-14-4

NYY (5.10): 63-19-13-16-6-7

BAL (5.05): 60-20-15-15-10-4

BOS (5.02): 64-16-9-12-16-5

LAD (4.93): 60-23-15-10-11-5

There’s really nothing to choose from there in terms of consistency.   

No matter how many facts are used it never works. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

The whole idea that somewhere there are teams with “consistent” offenses that average 5 runs a game and never score below 4 is a fantasy.  Here are the top 5 offenses in baseball in runs per game, and how often they have scored 5+, 4, 3, 2, 1 and 0 runs.

AZD (5.23): 65-16-14-11-14-4

NYY (5.10): 63-19-13-16-6-7

BAL (5.05): 60-20-15-15-10-4

BOS (5.02): 64-16-9-12-16-5

LAD (4.93): 60-23-15-10-11-5

There’s really nothing to choose from there in terms of consistency.   

The weakest offenses are probably the most consistent. It’s a lot easier to consistently score few runs. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boston's offense "got it done" last night because Cano grooved a couple of fat pitches to Yoshida and Duran.  

Sims was able to get Santander out in the bottom of the 7th because he tood advantage of the HP umpire's idiosyncratic strike zone, getting an inside pitch called for strike one and then throwing a pitch to the same spot with two strikes.  Santander had no choice but to swing.    Our relievers don't have enough command to exploit bad calls like that.  

Our hitting is fine overall.  RISP will come and go.  Failure to execute in clutch situations is usually the result of good pitching.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Three Run Homer said:

Boston's offense "got it done" last night because Cano grooved a couple of fat pitches to Yoshida and Duran.  

Sims was able to get Santander out in the bottom of the 7th because he tood advantage of the HP umpire's idiosyncratic strike zone, getting an inside pitch called for strike one and then throwing a pitch to the same spot with two strikes.  Santander had no choice but to swing.    Our relievers don't have enough command to exploit bad calls like that.  

Our hitting is fine overall.  RISP will come and go.  Failure to execute in clutch situations is usually the result of good pitching.  

There’s a lot to what you say.  Cano had a chance to escape the 7th but threw the batter a meatball with 2 strikes.   Sims had a chance to escape his half and did so by executing a really good 2-strike pitch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, zweem said:

The offense is offensive. Yeah the overall offense looks good-  10runs, 11runs, 1 run , 2 runs,2 runs does not make an even 500 team. We seem to have a statistic (whole lotta runs) verses a consistent, reliable, winning offense.

I’m not sure if you made a reactionary thread in response to last night’s frustrating loss or you haven’t taken the time to really look at what’s been going on?

But these are the facts:

- There have been 55 games played from June 15 (the day after Kyle Bradish was injured).

- In 29 of those games, we have given up 5 runs or greater. This includes the following - 1 game allowing 19 runs, 1 game allowing 14 runs, 1 game allowing 12 runs, 1 game allowing 11, 2 allowing 10, 3 allowing 9, 4 allowing 8.

- In the past 55 games we have thrown ONE single shutout (a game in which we defeated Seattle 1-0).

- There have been 5 times (during this stretch) where we have managed to go at least 3 consecutive games WITHOUT giving up more than 5 runs. Our longest stretch during this time is 4 games. Which means we haven’t made it through the rotation 1 SINGLE TIME without allowing more than 5 runs in a game. 

- Our average runs allowed per game during this 55 game stretch is 5.47 runs per game.

Our pitching has been amongst the worst in MLB for almost 2 full calendar months worth of games.

Please tell me what Major League team can consistently win or has an offense good enough to overcome pitching like this? 

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense isn’t bad but their timing has sucked. They’ll score 10 when the pitching gives up 12 and then score 1 in a winnable game like last night. That’s not on them but it’s definitely frustrating and probably why it seems like they are so inconsistent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Wavetrapper said:

Burnes (3 crappy starts in a row)

Eflin

Suarez (generally keeps them in most games)

Seranthony 

 

When 9 out of 13 are unreliable and ineffective, that will lead to bitching about pitching 

 

 

I wouldn’t say the Burnes Aug. 10 start was crappy.   6 IP, 3 R.  He had one tough inning.  However, I won’t be taking this next start for granted.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I think it's because Pivetta has reverse splits this year. Now, do you value his career numbers or this year...I'm not sure. But maybe SIGBOT cares about this year more maybe because of pitch mix/effectiveness can vary year to year. Who knows. Against righties: .279/.311/.514 - .825 OPS Lefties: .187/.251/.365 - .616 OPS  
    • So he has the same first 6 hitters and plays Rivera over Mayo who has hit better and is a much better defender along with playing Slater in the outfield which gives us better defense over Santander and takes McCann a light hitting catcher out of the game.  So he made an upgrade at 3rd base with how both guys are playing and flipped Slater for McCann and thus makes it an awful lineup.  It makes me laugh how much people get upset about nothing.  
    • Coulombe doesn't have righty/lefty splits. It's why he is so damn good.  Akin doesn't have righty/lefty splits this year, and he didn't last year but he was awful/hurt. He definitely did in 2022. But he stinks with runners on and in high leverage situations. Soto is super inconsistent and when he blows up he's awful. Last year he stunk against righties, but was excellent against lefties. I reckon they want him to get back to that. To me, the pecking order would be this: Coulombe and Perez for high leverage situations Akin only in for fresh innings and to give 1-2 IP. Soto I just don't trust. He had a nice stretch there for a minute, but in the end...he was pitching in mostly low leverage situations. 
    • Last night's lineup was Hyde first decent lineup in a long time, but tonight's lineup is another abysmal one from him. If Elias was going to make a dumpster dive trade for Austin Slater, I can somewhat see the logic behind strictly using Slater as a platoon player. But I definitely don't understand giving him more starts against righties. What both Elias and Hyde are saying by giving Slater opportunities is, "We don't care about stats or splits, we have a good feeling about this guy." That's it, and that's terrible roster management.  Slater has extreme favorable career splits against lefties, and the Elias apologists on this board pointed to Slater being a good platoon matchup hitter against lefties, saying he makes some sense if you believe his struggles against lefties this season would normalize closer to his career line. Yet Slater is still actually hitting better against righties this season. Ultimately, in the end, Slater is a .600 OPS hitter overall this season. Which makes him unplayable to any competent manager or GM. There was a reason Slater was available at the trade deadline for cash considerations. And it's because he sucks. Emmanuel Rivera, meanwhile, has a .597 OPS this season. Sorry, not even a gold glove 3B is worth rostering with that kind of bat. Yet Hyde continues to give Rivera at bats over a top 10 prospect who should be getting as many starts as possible to get comfortable. Unbelievable.  Slater and Rivera could each hit a home run tonight, and that still wouldn't change how terrible they are or that it's bad lineup optimization to start both of these bums. 
    • Right. Let's just be honest and say that he did a great job building the farm system through the Houston "tank" philosophy, but now must prove he can be good at building the MLB product. But yes, this trade looks dreadful at the moment. 
    • I still expect him to be a very good player.   However, I was hoping for 70 grade bat-to-ball and instead he had a 21.8% in-zone whiff % at Norfolk.  His Tides OPS was powered by a 20% walk rate which won’t stick at the big league level.  I was hoping for solid SS defense and plus 2B defense, but it looks more like solid at 2B and maybe not viable at SS. Going into the season I was hoping for perennial MVP candidate and now have tempered my outlook to occasional All-Star.  I recognize he is 20 but so are the other Jackson’s.
    • Billy Rowell.  Should be capping off a hall of fame career by now but he’s smoking pot and collecting shopping carts at a Food Lion in Jersey.  Jokes aside, De Leon was a guy I had hopes for headed into the season cause we’re thin with pitching.  I thought Beavers was going to be a solid prospect. Mayo for looking completely lost when arriving in Baltimore. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...