Jump to content

Sign Holliday or trade prospects?


JTrea81

To land an established big bat before 2011 what you would rather do?  

154 members have voted

  1. 1. To land an established big bat before 2011 what you would rather do?


This poll is closed to new votes


Recommended Posts

It depends...What prospects do you have to trade and what bat are you getting?

What if you could obtain a very good young bat for Guthrie, JJ, Snyder, Erbe and Pie or Reimold?

If you could get a good player for that package, one that is under control for 3+ years, in an area of need, I would prefer that.

So, it just kind of depends on what you have to give up and who you need acquire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

C. Watch Wieters, Reimold, Jones, Bell develop into one of the most promising young collections of middle-of-the-order bats in baseball and drop Carlos Pena in the middle of it next off-season (age an position could easily keep the price tag down, as it did with Dunn -- though not to quite the same extent). Heck, Dunn is available again next year. Maybe he's ready to DH by then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with most of the other people. I want to wait and see all our young talent develop and see what we need after that.

And if we find we need a big bat for the next 5-6 years, it will have been a mistake to pass up on Holliday for what he is going to get, right?

Otherwise you are paying 160-200 million for Fielder or Gonzalez if they are even available, or having to trade away valuable prospects.

Spending money and draft picks to keep signing veteran stopgaps that you hope will overachieve to 2 year deals isn't worth it.

Pena and Lee will both be Type A's next year and depending on how the Orioles do, will likely cost a first or second round pick to sign.

Both are inferior to Holliday who will only cost a third rounder to sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any scenario in your world where it would be a mistake to sign Holliday to a big contract?

No, as I feel he is going to be worth what he is paid. Remember we aren't talking 7/140 here, which is what he would normally get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JTrea has a gut feeling. We think it's indigestion but he feels pretty strongly that the O's are in it.

In what? The Orioles have other needs to address and don't need to throw all their money into something that they are already have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C. Watch Wieters, Reimold, Jones, Bell develop into one of the most promising young collections of middle-of-the-order bats in baseball and drop Carlos Pena in the middle of it next off-season (age an position could easily keep the price tag down, as it did with Dunn -- though not to quite the same extent). Heck, Dunn is available again next year. Maybe he's ready to DH by then.
Excellent point, and what AM has in mind no doubt. I don't think you'll get a response from the Trea on this one.:laughlol:
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And why don't you think it was a mistake?

Because you feel he will be worth the contract?

I think the fact that BAL had nothing else in place for 2B helps the deal from being classified as a mistake. But it wasn't a good baseball move. He's already slipping defensively and will likely be below average 2011-13 (if not by next year).

His two most valuable years were likely wastes, but the deal likely hasn't prevented AM from making other moves and it certainly hasn't complicated anything by forcing BAL to jump through extra hoops. The only way I can see it being called a "bad" deal is if there was evidence that AM turned down a good long term MIF solution via trade for Roberts.

The 4-year deal isn't something I was on board with, but it's nowhere near the complicating, unnecessary mess that a Holliday signing could produce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Unfortunately have not really been able to watch I wish they showed more ST games on MASN.
    • Prospects Live has their first scouting book out and Gunnar is on the cover.  Please be no jinx. Please be no jinx. Prospects Live
    • I have no doubt that the WBC games are 100 times more electric than a spring training game.  ST games are very relaxing and fun, but they are the opposite of intense.  I’m still surprised at the viewing disparity, though I’ll wait until tomorrow night before considering the poll results comparable since I started the WBC poll a day earlier.  
    • Fangraphs credits him with 2.1 fWAR at 3B and 1.7 at SS, so that’s 3.8 so far (it’s possible they might have him dabbling at DH once in a while, we’ll see).  At SS, the O’s ranked 18th at 3.4 fWAR, with Mateo and Henderson splitting time roughly 60/40.  Fangraphs comments: “This playing time projection is the numerical equivalent of throwing your hands up in the air. Henderson looks bound for stardom, be it at third or shortstop, but Mateo is still holding on to the position for now after a solid defensive year established him as the everyday starter. His offensive numbers are downright ugly – that .284 projected wOBA is the second-lowest for anyone in this article with 100 or more PAs – but you can get away with that kind of bat at shortstop if your glove is transcendent. “In 2022, Mateo’s was, but he’d never flashed that level of defense before, so Orioles talent evaluators will have their work cut out for them early in the year. Henderson will likely start the season at third base, but if Mateo’s defense looks shaky, the team should make the switch sooner rather than later. Those offensive numbers next to Henderson’s name are no joke — think Corey Seager, if you’re looking for a parallel as an offense-first lefty shortstop. 2023 is just the start of Baltimore’s plan for contention, but what they do at shortstop will have ramifications for both this year and the future.” https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2023-positional-power-rankings-shortstop/  
    • What I've been seeing overall is that a lot of fans were more engaged with the WBC than with their regular team this spring. Just yesterday I was talking to someone who had gone to the games in Miami and were raving about the experience.
    • I hadn’t really started the WBC poll with this in mind, but so far it appears that many more OH members tuned into the WBC than have tuned in to O’s spring training games.   Considering the composition of the audience, and the frequent complaints about the paucity of O’s spring training broadcasts, that’s not necessarily the outcome I would have expected.  
    • It's only Spring Training, but....... I'm getting pretty amped up for some baseball. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...