Jump to content

Terps headed to Military Bowl


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The players and the 8-4 team deserve better. The 3rd place team should not go to the worst bowl. We had not do good attendance but it was after a 2-10 season and it was a weak home slate.

It also sucks because the tickets are expensive, in a crappy stadium, it will be cold, and the opponent is not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The players and the 8-4 team deserve better. The 3rd place team should not go to the worst bowl. We had not do good attendance but it was after a 2-10 season and it was a weak home slate.

It also sucks because the tickets are expensive, in a crappy stadium, it will be cold, and the opponent is not good.

I'm going to play "devils advocate" here. Why do they deserve better, b/c they had an 8-4 record after a 2-10 season?

What is so marketable about the Terps? Who was their signature win this year? Navy? BC? NC State? Those were the only "good" wins they had, none of them were great. Not one signature win but mostly wins against teams with losing records. WVU was the best team the Terps faced and they looked like Towson against them.

What about their style of play? Is it marketable? Do they have a dominating, suffocating defense? No. Do they have a prolific, high scoring offense with a playmaking QB or RB? Spread option? No. Just the boring, short passing game of the West Coast offense, a promising QB and a quality receiver in Torrey Smith. There is nothing marketable about their style of play.

Had they posted a signature win or two this year and possessed a high scoring offense with a game breaking player, I firmly believe they wouldn't be going to the Military Bowl. If they had just taken care of business against any one of Clemson, Miami or FSU, no military bowl.

Instead, I think they should graciously accept their bowl bid and work hard, aspire to greater things next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to play "devils advocate" here. Why do they deserve better, b/c they had an 8-4 record after a 2-10 season?

What is so marketable about the Terps? Who was their signature win this year? Navy? BC? NC State? Those were the only "good" wins they had, none of them were great. Not one signature win but mostly wins against teams with losing records. WVU was the best team the Terps faced and they looked like Towson against them.

What about their style of play? Is it marketable? Do they have a dominating, suffocating defense? No. Do they have a prolific, high scoring offense with a playmaking QB or RB? Spread option? No. Just the boring, short passing game of the West Coast offense, a promising QB and a quality receiver in Torrey Smith. There is nothing marketable about their style of play.

Had they posted a signature win or two this year and possessed a high scoring offense with a game breaking player, I firmly believe they wouldn't be going to the Military Bowl. If they had just taken care of business against any one of Clemson, Miami or FSU, no military bowl.

Instead, I think they should graciously accept their bowl bid and work hard, aspire to greater things next year.

My heart is with Bako, but my head is with you. I thought they would have had a chance at the Champs Sports Bowl, but oh well. Even though it's only in DC and will be cold as hell, I may actually be able to go. That's worth something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My heart is with Bako, but my head is with you. I thought they would have had a chance at the Champs Sports Bowl, but oh well. Even though it's only in DC and will be cold as hell, I may actually be able to go. That's worth something.

My heart would love to see them go somewhere and play a big name opponent. As I was saying though, I think they are a tough "sell" to bowl committees. Even the wins against Duke, BC, NC State were pretty close and perhaps if they had some "style points" in those wins the committees would have seen the Terps differently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geez, I just saw that BC got selected for their bowl after the Terps, and yet they get a much better game.....in San Francisco vs #13 Nevada. This whole bowl selection thing is just eff'd. I hope whatever anger the Terps have about this whole thing that they take it out on their opponent and just embarrass the hell out of East Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also just read that despite going 8-4 (and beating BCS-bound UConn)' date=' Temple will not get to play in a bowl game at all. I guess Terps fans will just have to file this under "It could always be worse."[/quote']

That's awful. It will never happen, but a play off system similar to March Madness would be the greatest thing in the world. Could you imagine an entire month of that? There's no way that it would be 64 teams, but still.

Even as Terps fans, how cool would it be if they were headed to a college football NIT? I don't get it all all--there's no way that a playoff system like that wouldn't make a boat load of money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be honest, if the Terps weren't going to Florida I would have hoped they'd end up here. For one, they'll actually make money off this bowl and save on travel costs, as opposed to hemoraging money by going to someplace else that no one was interested in. And even better, this is a bowl game I can go to. Playing East Carolina isn't all that interesting, I know, and I know the game is considered eighth on the list. But I'll take it over El Paso, I'll take it over Shreveport.

Terp football isn't as high on the food chain around here compared to where it ranks for other schools in the conference. I wish that wasn't the case, but it is. After a one-year hiatus I bought my season tickets again this year and plan to renew. I'll go to the bowl game (though I'll probably buy through a Northrup Grumman hookup which gets me 25% off) and have fun. And I won't have to watch them on TV play someone from Shreveport.

And, as an aside, I think Oregonbird is the most bitter Terps fan ever. I'm not saying that as an insult or anything, but man, he's negative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does the ACC split its team's bowl revenues evenly, or do you get what you earn?

The revenues are divided evenly between the 12 ACC teams and the conference. Non-BCS bowl teams do get $1.1M for expenses regardless of destination, so ending up in DC does help. BCS berths receive $1.7M from the conference for expenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The revenues are divided evenly between the 12 ACC teams and the conference. Non-BCS bowl teams do get $1.1M for expenses regardless of destination, so ending up in DC does help. BCS berths receive $1.7M from the conference for expenses.

I guess that's good for the bean-counters in the Athletic Dept. $1.1 million minus a bus ride to RFK Stadium and back to College Park.....ca-ching. Or do the Terps have to return what they don't spend out of the travel pot?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does it creep anyone else out that we even have a "Military Bowl?" "Presented by Northrop Grumman," no less. Jeez, just give them some tanks and grenades and let's get on with it.

The reason for the name is because the primary beneficiary of Military Bowl proceeds is the USO. And as a former serviceman, I can vouch that they perform excellent and much-appreciated services for our troops and their families. Most of these bowl games are non-profits that donate funds to various charities in their communities. Obviously there are many other entities involved that do profit, but the organizers of the game itself usually don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
    • There are several advantages to a head first slide.    With a head first slide, the mass of your body (torso) is lunging forward, not pulling backward - you get to the bag quicker. When you tuck a leg to slide, your foot tends to raise up and not hit the front of the bag, whereas, with your hand you can hit the front of the bag and maintain contact with it. You can adjust the direction of your slide going head first and even switch which arm you extend to touch the bag (swim move) to avoid a tag.  Both can have their place.  I was taught to slide with the right leg tucked going into second base.  That way, your face/chest/crotch are not exposed to the throw from the catcher if the fielder misses the throw, and you're facing the outfield and can find the ball easier if there is an errant throw so you can decide quicker if you can take another base. 
    • Briefly, here is the method I use with a DirecTV DVR for all sorts of timing in football analysis: 1. From a recording on your DVR, hit pause at some point shortly before the ball is released by the pitcher 2. While still on pause, use the FF button to advance the video 1 "frame" at a time.  On 1080i, the screen is redrawn 30 times per second, so each click is 1/30th of a second.  On 720p or 1080p, it's 60 frames per second.  So timing should be accurate to either 1/30th (0.033) or 1/60th (0.017) of a second 3. Advance the video to the point of contact--It is easy to go forward, but difficult to go backward, so you need to advance slowly to fin the closest point 4. From that point, count the number of FF clicks until Gunnar hits 3rd base, you should actually be able to see the image move with each click, so it's easier to count these than you might think 5. Divide clicks counted by 30 to get seconds for the event.  For example, if you get 322 clicks, it's 10 and 22/30 seconds (10.73 sec).  This assumes the MASN broadcast is in 1080i. I've been using this method for more than 15 years and you can confirm calibration with an NFL game where the clock is on the screen.  Since you don't have that in baseball, you just have to know whether it's 30 or 60 clicks per second and you'll know that by whether it's an 11 or 22-second triple.
    • Wait, Drungo isn't allowed to make jokes? I thought that post was hilarious given the context. I think better of him for it, though I've always thought highly of him.
    • By the way, something they absolutely need to legislate is the size of the oven mitt. I forget who it was, one of these guys had one that was basically giving him 18 inch fingers.
    • You can also slide to the side of the bag and reach back... I'd like to see data both on safety and success rates for each one before making a call.  Either way, I agree, a team probably shouldn't on their own put themselves at a competitive disadvantage by voluntarily imposing rules on itself. So if this is a problem, then the proper way to deal with it would be to change the rules like they have with catcher's interference (which I support). 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...