Jump to content

New Autograph Policy for Fanfest


SilentJames

Recommended Posts

How do we feel about this?

The Orioles will introduce a new autograph policy designed to shorten wait times and support youth charitable endeavors through OriolesREACH. Children ages 4 to 14 will have a specially designated Kids Only player autograph station presented that is free of charge and will operate continuously throughout the day. All other autograph stations will require the advance purchase of autograph vouchers.

The vouchers will be available at www.orioles.com for $15 each, with all proceeds to benefit children's charities through OriolesREACH. Vouchers will go on sale next Saturday, Jan. 15, at 10 a.m. There will be 250 vouchers available for each autograph session, guaranteeing each fan who purchases a voucher for a particular session an autograph from each of the three-to-four players at the station.

http://www.masnsports.com/school_of_roch/2011/01/fanfest-set-for-jan-29.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

They have cream for that now..

But yeah, I have no real issue with this either. I like to get one sutograph session and 15 bucks to charity for a shorter wait time and picking who I want is worth it to me.

The autographs are for the kids more than anyone so I am fine with this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will fans who don't get a voucher still be able to have the chance to get an autograph? If so, then I'm OK with this idea. It's a great way to raise money. I will be prett upset if people complain about this, because it's all for charity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, instead of paying for admission then waiting in very long lines for autographs, I now have to pay for admission, pay $15 per autograph session, then wait in very long lines.

I understand that this goes to charity, but this seems to be a giant slap in the face to any fan over 14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Autographs are mostly lost on me.

It's cool to have one, but I really don't have any decent memoribilia to have signed, usually it's just a baseball.

I'll probably throw 15 bucks their way and grab an autograph because it's charitable.

Last fanfest I got a Brad Bergesen autograph, and that was all I was really aiming for. I'm a big Brad Bergesen fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For fifteen dollars you should be able to buy a few certified autographed cards from a major sports card company (Topps, Upper Deck etc.) on ebay. Brian Roberts has plenty that are very cheap, some include pieces of game used jersey too.

I stopped going after the 2004 one that was so packed that people were just walking through without tickets unnoticed. We bought our tickets and literally turned around to see people leaving the line and walking through without paying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...