Jump to content

Vlad Press Conference 2PM Friday


weams

Recommended Posts

Except that Sosa was a prima donna and bad in the clubhouse. I've never heard a teammate say a bad word about Vlad.

Exactly, as soon as Sammy Sosa started to get famous he got full of himself and like you said he was a true prima donna. He let the attention and fame go to his head and don't get me started with his performance at the 2005 steroid hearings lol. Vlad is still the same humble quiet guy he was when he first came to the major leagues. Former teammates have talked about how Vlad is fun to be around, how good a cook his mom is, and how focused he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Perhaps a better comp for Vlad would be Jim Rice.

BB-ref has Rice as Vlad's #3 most similar comp through age 35. The two players more similar have PED links (Sheffield, Palmeiro).

Essentially, Rice was done at age 36, playing in only 56 games putting up an OPS+ of 70.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sosa was run out of town. On a team that was approaching it's 100th anniversary of their last world series win. He wasn't coming off an excellent season either.

Vlad gives this lineup it's legitimacy.

While he hit 35 homeruns in 2004, he didn't hit for a good average and you could slowly see him decline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did Sosa cause problems in the clubhouse in 2005? I know he was sent home early, but I don't really remember what caused it.

Bottom line, both guys were aging sluggers brought in for one year. I thought Sosa was a decent move at the time and still do, and obviously I like the Vlad signing.

But I wouldn't be shocked at all to see Vlad's time in Baltimore very similar to Sosa's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Sosa/Vlad thing is very similar, actually, with the same amount of risk/reward.

Okay, I've said this before...but, who here believes that Sosa used steroids? I would assume that a lot of people do, not just here, but everywhere.

Keeping that in mind, we acquired Sammy Sosa for the 2005 Major League season, THE VERY SEASON after this was passed:

Jan. 13, 2005 – Players and Owners Agree to New Drug Program, Names to be Made Public

During a quarterly owners' meeting in Scottsdale, Ariz., the owners vote unanimously to accept recently concluded negotiations between MLB and the union strengthening the drug program. The new punitive measures for Major Leaguers are a 10-day suspension for the first positive test, 30 days for the second, 60 days for the third, and one year for the fourth. All without pay. On the first positive, the players name is released to the public. The program is separated from the Basic Agreement, which expires on Dec. 19, 2006, and is extended until 2008.

I don't know the science, or how long these things stay in your system. But, for a guy who denied steroid use in front of Congress, that seems like a legitimate reason to STOP TAKING THEM. So he stops taking steroids realizing the legal and personal ramifications of being caught under the new policy (which will release his name)...Is it reasonable to assume that because of this, his Home Run total from 2004 (35) dipped to 14 in 2005, and he retired after the season at age 37? Who retires at 37, one year removed from hitting 35 home runs??

In any case, this Vlad scenario is nothing like the Sammy Sosa stint in Baltimore, in my mind. Vlad will perform a lot better than some of you skeptics care to dream of.

Edit: Sosa was 36 at the very end of the 2005 season, and turned 37 that November...so he was a new 37.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I've said this before...but, who here believes that Sosa used steroids? I would assume that a lot of people do, not just here, but everywhere.

Keeping that in mind, we acquired Sammy Sosa for the 2005 Major League season, THE VERY SEASON after this was passed:

I don't know the science, or how long these things stay in your system. But, for a guy who denied steroid use in front of Congress, that seems like a legitimate reason to STOP TAKING THEM. So he stops taking steroids realizing the legal and personal ramifications of being caught under the new policy (which will release his name)...Is it reasonable to assume that because of this, his Home Run total from 2004 (35) dipped to 14 in 2005, and he retired after the season at age 37? Who retires at 37, one year removed from hitting 35 home runs??

In any case, this Vlad scenario is nothing like the Sammy Sosa stint in Baltimore, in my mind. Vlad will perform a lot better than some of you skeptics care to dream of.

Edit: Sosa was 36 at the very end of the 2005 season, and turned 37 that November...so he was a new 37.

Don't forget the corked bat situation, too. I've never used steroids, but I've been close friends with professional athletes who did and weekend warriors who did. Anecdotally, once they start to use, they can't ever feel strong without them. It's a crutch they become dependent on. The corking of the bat was exactly what a guy who was trying to go off roids would do from my experience. The fragile psyche at work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vlad can help the lineup on reputation alone for at least the first run through the league. He will provide protection for the other guys for at least that long. And, if he does start hitting, look out.

Plus, he embodies the level of professionalism that these guys need to learn from. He is definitely an important part of the building process . . . and . . . it is still a process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the Sosa/Vlad thing is very similar, actually, with the same amount of risk/reward.

Except for the part about Sosa being a cheater. Any objective person could see that once he stopped using steroids and corking his bat, he was going to fall off a cliff. There's never been a hint of allegations like that surrounding Vlad. Yes, his body has some heavy mileage on it, so steep drop from last year is certainly possible. But the fact that Vlad was a great player up through last season without having to cheat makes him less risky than Sosa was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I expect Vlad to have a pretty good year. I don't think anyone is expecting him to put up 30 bomb and 120 Rbis... but he will provide a presence and knock in some runs. The key is health. Buck is going to have to really massage this team to get them through 160 games... seems like a bunch of key guys are going to need a bunch of games off throughout the season...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Right..if the Orioles can trade for Brenton Doyle (my favorite top target), why should we care that his salary is low? Also in that scenario, Mullins is likely gone, so payroll would actually go down I believe. But someone like Bemore wins would still complain because the payroll isn’t where he thinks it should be.
    • From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...