Jump to content

Some fun Hangouter stats

Tony-OH

By Tony-OH
in Orioles Talk

Recommended Posts

SilentJames Hangout Veteran Council

SilentJames

Posted
Posted
Proof positive that a picture is worth 1,000 words.

Also, Tony, we need a rep per post ratio. Total rep is "merely a counting stat." ;) I may have accumulated the most rep because I post so much, but it's obvious that others are giving more bang for the buck.

Mine is 3.95 P/R

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply
TonySoprano Hangout Grand Counsel

TonySoprano

Posted
Posted

I like to look at the "top 10" this way ;)

rk	OH	Points	Posts	Q1	Greg	6,736	7,060	0.95412	Weams	8,115	11,865	0.68393	TSopr	8,610	12,620	0.68234	Dip9	7,159	11,736	0.61005	Drungo	9,099	22,676	0.40136	Moose	9,795	25,534	0.38367	HankS	7,724	24,802	0.31148	ScOtt 	6,679	22,227	0.30059	Frobby	10,529	41,602	0.253110	SG	8,171	94,763	0.0862
Link to comment
Share on other sites
eb45 Major Leaguer Rising Star

eb45

Posted
Posted

At one point I had more rep points than I did posts (something like 425 to 416), because I tried to make my 500 free ones count. I've since moved away from that, and I'm not particularly funny, so my post-to-rep ratio has suffered.

Eh, I've learned a lot from this board in the 3+ years I've been here, and hopefully I've helped other people learn some as well. That's what message boards are for, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dipper9 Hangout Grand Counsel

Dipper9

Posted
Posted
I like to look at the "top 10" this way ;)
rk	OH	Points	Posts	Q1	Greg	6,736	7,060	0.95412	Weams	8,115	11,865	0.68393	TSopr	8,610	12,620	0.68234	Dip9	7,159	11,736	0.61005	Drungo	9,099	22,676	0.40136	Moose	9,795	25,534	0.38367	HankS	7,724	24,802	0.31148	ScOtt 	6,679	22,227	0.30059	Frobby	10,529	41,602	0.253110	SG	8,171	94,763	0.0862

BIG drop from 1 to 2 and from 4 to 5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
isestrex Hangout Grand Counsel

isestrex

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the info Tony! I've heard of a few of those guys ;)

Just out of curiosity, why don't you make the "members" and stats public like other message boards do? I've always wondered why they aren't available to the public (or even plus members).

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hoosiers Hangout Grand Counsel

hoosiers

Posted
Posted

A lot of BABIP luck in those numbers above!

Also, they need to be league and park adjusted.

__________________________________________________

Just kidding, of course. Good stuff all around. This board continues to improve every year not just from what Tony provides, but also new viewpoints from Stotle and CRStoner's efforts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Icterus galbula Perennial All-Star

Icterus galbula

Posted
Posted

Cool stats.

Regarding the list I'm on- I'll gladly accept a ranking behind justD and SammyBirdland. They bring the goods- videos and photoshop funnies. I'm not even sure what I bring to the table, so I feel humbled.

Also, I determined my "Q' is .732. How do you like dem apples, Soprano? :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Sports Guy
      JD Martinez

      By Sports Guy · Posted

      Right..if the Orioles can trade for Brenton Doyle (my favorite top target), why should we care that his salary is low? Also in that scenario, Mullins is likely gone, so payroll would actually go down I believe. But someone like Bemore wins would still complain because the payroll isn’t where he thinks it should be.
    • Bahama O's Fan
      JD Martinez

      By Bahama O's Fan · Posted

      From here https://www.mlb.com/orioles/stats/ops/regular-season
    • OsFanSinceThe80s
      JD Martinez

      By OsFanSinceThe80s · Posted

      Where are you getting your stats from that's not correct looking at OPS.
    • Bahama O's Fan
      JD Martinez

      By Bahama O's Fan · Posted

      On the O's this year, Martinez would have been: 5th in OPS 5th in AVG 6th in HRs in 120 games
    • Hallas
      2024 Ravens regular season discussion

      By Hallas · Posted

      I think PFF is grading Roquan badly because the safeties behind him are playing like ass and it's making him look bad.  If teams are going to attack him over the middle on crossing routes with WRs (like KC did with Rice) he doesn't really stand much of a chance if the safeties behind him don't throw him a bone.  He's still a huge help in the run game.   In general I think PFF assigns a little too much blame to linebackers on passes over the middle, so unless you're an elite coverage guy at LB it's really hard to grade well.  The flip side to this is that teams probably need to adjust their coverage areas to account for the fact that LBs aren't going to be able to hold down WRs for long.  
    • Tony-OH
      2024 Ravens regular season discussion

      By Tony-OH · Posted

      Thanks. This tells me what my eyes have seen with Roquan. He's been a liability in coverage and the fact that Simpson is ahead of him is not good for our defensive leader. Do you have the PFF grades for offense too?
    • foxfield
      JD Martinez

      By foxfield · Posted

      What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...