Jump to content

Chris Davis is a Keeper


brianod

Recommended Posts

I don't understand why pitchers even bother throwing Davis a strike. Yesterday is an example of what Davis is... he crushes an opo HR and then strikes out in the next at bat on a pitch that was practically a pitch out. Davis has never had good plate discipline... why do you think Texas gave a guy up for Koji who was raking in the minors (even though it was the PCL league).

Now if somehow Davis could change his approach and be in more 2-1 counts instead of 1-2 counts we could have found a gem. But at this season has shown he is what he is. A guy who will hit 25 hrs and never walk.

At least when Reynolds K's he typically misses a strike and works the pitcher. :)

An odd fact about Davis is that, even though he rarely walks, he actually sees 4.05 pitches per plate appearance, second highest on the team. But you are right, he has a very high swing percentage on pitches outside the strike zone (39.3%, second worst on the team, to Adam Jones' 40.4%). It's a huge flaw in his game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 279
  • Created
  • Last Reply
An odd fact about Davis is that, even though he rarely walks, he actually sees 4.05 pitches per plate appearance, second highest on the team. But you are right, he has a very high swing percentage on pitches outside the strike zone (39.3%, second worst on the team, to Adam Jones' 40.4%). It's a huge flaw in his game.

That is surprising...thanks for that info. I would've never dreamed he saw 4.05 pitches per at bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is surprising...thanks for that info. I would've never dreamed he saw 4.05 pitches per at bat.

Well, it takes at least three pitches to strike out. The players with the lowest P/PA are usually guys who rarely strike out and are very good at making contact, but are impatient, like Vlad and Miggy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it takes at least three pitches to strike out. The players with the lowest P/PA are usually guys who rarely strike out and are very good at making contact, but are impatient, like Vlad and Miggy.

I'd love to see the P/PA numbers for some old timers, back in the day when it was possible to strike out 10 or 20 times in a full season. Like these guys:

                                                                                                                                    Rk                Player SO BB Year Age  Tm Lg   G  PA  AB  R   H 2B 3B HR RBI IBB HBP SH SF GDP SB CS   BA  OBP  SLG  OPS       Pos1              Edd Roush  5 17 1931  38 CIN NL 101 400 376 46 102 12  5  1      41   3         4     2 .271 .308 .338 .646        872         Stuffy McInnis  5 15 1922  31 CLE AL 142 582 537 58 164 28  7  1      78   1        27  1  5 .305 .325 .389 .715        *33            Lloyd Waner  6 16 1942  36 PHI NL 101 315 287 23  75  7  3  0      10   0     2   3     1 .261 .300 .307 .607        *84         Ernie Lombardi  6 16 1935  27 CIN NL 120 351 332 36 114 23  3 12      64   3     0  11     0 .343 .379 .539 .918        *25         Stuffy McInnis  6 15 1924  33 BSN NL 146 611 581 57 169 23  7  1      59   2        13  9  3 .291 .311 .360 .671        *36             Lave Cross  6 19 1901  35 PHA AL 100 450 424 82 139 28 12  2      73   1         6    23 .328 .358 .465 .823        *57            Don Mueller  7 15 1956  29 NYG NL 138 473 453 38 122 12  1  5  41   2   0  2  4  18  0  1 .269 .290 .333 .624        *98            Joe Schultz  7 11 1919  25 STL NL  88 246 229 24  58  9  1  2      21   0         5     4 .253 .288 .328 .615   *9/48759             Nap Lajoie  7 19 1902  27 TOT AL  87 385 352 81 133 35  5  7      65   6         8    20 .378 .419 .565 .984        *410      Sport McAllister  7 15 1901  26 DET AL  90 336 306 45  92  9  4  3      57   5        10    17 .301 .344 .386 .729   235/97611    Ossee Schrecongost  7 19 1901  26 BOS AL  86 307 280 37  85 13  5  0      38   4         4     6 .304 .356 .386 .742      *2/312         Bill Killefer  8 15 1919  31 CHC NL 103 344 315 17  90 10  2  0      22   2        13     5 .286 .322 .330 .652        *213    Ossee Schrecongost  8  9 1902  27 TOT AL  97 376 358 50 117 17  2  2      52   1         8     5 .327 .345 .402 .747     *23/814              Bob Wood  8 12 1901  35 CLE AL  98 368 346 45 101 23  3  1      49   6         4     6 .292 .327 .384 .711 *2/59643715          Charlie Deal  9 13 1921  29 CHC NL 115 454 422 52 122 19  8  3      66   0        19  3  5 .289 .310 .393 .704        *516         Willie Keeler  9 15 1907  35 NYY AL 107 467 423 50  99  5  2  0      17   3        26     7 .234 .265 .255 .521        *917            Lave Cross  9 13 1904  38 PHA AL 155 639 607 73 176 31 10  1      71   5        14    10 .290 .310 .379 .689        *518              Tim Foli 10 17 1981  30 PIT NL  86 351 316 32  78 12  2  0  20   0   1 14  3   2  7  7 .247 .285 .297 .582        *619     Burgess Whitehead 10 14 1941  31 NYG NL 116 429 403 41  92 15  4  1      23   2    10  18     7 .228 .258 .293 .551      *4/520           Joe Schultz 10 19 1922  28 STL NL 112 373 344 50 108 13  4  2      64   0        10  3  1 .314 .350 .392 .742      97/8

In 1924 Stuffy McInnis put the ball in play about 588 of his 611 PAs. You have to figure that nearly 100% of the time he's swinging, and making contact, with the first pitch he can reach. Tejada is around 3.5 P/PA, McInnis had to have been 2, 2.5. That is why pitchers used to be able to start every 3-4 days and throw 350 innings.

Or, even better, back in the real old days of the National Association when pitchers threw underhanded and it was 8 or 9 balls for a walk. Al Spalding led the league in PAs with 365 in 1874, and had zero strikeouts and 3 walks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see the P/PA numbers for some old timers, back in the day when it was possible to strike out 10 or 20 times in a full season.

I went back to 2002, which is as far back as ESPN has P/PA data, and the most impatient hitter by far was Randall Simon, who in 2002 saw 2.73 pitches per plate appearance. He put the ball in play 459 times in 506 PA (13 BB, 30 K's, 4 HBP). He was the only qualifier in the last 10 years under 3.00 P/PA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I'll end my comments with this:

I hope Chris Davis makes the allstar team next year with newly found plate discipline. I hope Mark Reynold hits 15 home runs between now and the end of the year and we resign him for a reasonable figure. I hope the two of them carry the Orioles to a world series championship.

See, I can say something that everyone can agree on:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every time he's on the TV screen and my wife is around, I say, "Is there nothing that Chris Davis cannot do?!?" She laughs. I do love me some Chris Davis. Based on his outrageous MiLB numbers you've got to think that over time it will start to translate more fully to the majors... I don't see why he can't be a .285 hitter with 38-ish dingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say he's a .750 OPS guy as if that is the low end of your expectations of Davis going forward, even though his career numbers are a hair below that and this season's numbers are eerily close to those, despite a fantastic start. .750 OPS is not good for a first baseman, corner outfielder, or DH. A .300 OBP is especially atrocious.

I really like Davis and I'm kind of tired of bashing him. But I just don't think he's our first baseman of the future. I don't think he will start making enough contact to be a first division starter. I don't think he has much development left; maybe he starts making more contact one day and turns into Jay Gibbons, but it's much more likely he's Josh Phelps.

League average OPS is about .730 this season. So a .750 OPS is better than average. I am not saying Davis is a starting 1B, I am saying he is a useful role player.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leaqgue average OPS is about .730 this season. So a .750 OPS is better than average. I am not saying Davis is a starting 1B, I am saying he is a useful role player.

1B: .779

DH: .776

LF: .758

RF: .761

Davis is below average in the spots he actually fills, at least right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1B: .779

DH: .776

LF: .758

RF: .761

Davis is below average in the spots he actually fills, at least right now.

I am using the league average in general. If we are saying hw is sub replacement level then his OPS should be lower than league average. I am not saying he should be a starting LF, RF or 1B. He is a role player IMO.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Chris Davis. I root for him, want him to succeed, as he seems like a good guy, and hope that he can develop into someone who should be kept around for a few years. Having said that, in no way shape or form is Chris Davis a keeper, not with the awful on-base skills that he has. Our best case scenario right now is it clicks enough that he becomes Joe Carter-lite. Our worst case scenario is he becomes Tony Batista, as the previous post mentions, where all he's good for is a homer that's negated by everything else being poor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am using tleague average in general. If we are saying hew is sub replacement level then his OPS should be lower than league average. I am not saying he should be a starting LF, RF or 1B. He is a role player IMO.

I think what you are saying is correct, but my point would be that the league average OPS is not that meaningful because it includes all the players who play the most challenging defensive positions, which Davis doesn't play. I do agree with you that just because he isn't good enough to be a starter at LF, RF or 1B, doesn't mean that he doesn't have value as a role player.

There are 38 players with at least 25 PA as a 1B, and Davis ranks 15th in OPS there.

There are 53 players with at least 25 PA as a LF, and Davis ranks 17th in OPS there.

There are 53 players with at least 25 PA as a DH, and Davis ranks 27th in OPS there.

There are 38 players with at least 25 PA as a RF, and Davis ranks 35th in OPS there.

If you just looked at Davis' overall OPS, instead of his position-specific OPS, he would rank 24th, 26th, 29th and 17th in those spots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...