Jump to content

Josh Hamilton market update - 3 years $60-75 million


TradeAngelos

Recommended Posts

Randy Johnson to AZ is the only one I can really think of thats not a Yank/Sox.
He's definitely one. Notice how the Yanks/Red Sox disclaimer was used. That takes away CC Sabathia, Manny Ramirez, Roger Clemens, David Cone...

Now if you want to add guys who added significantly to their payroll via trade you have Matt Holiday, Curt Schilling...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 578
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1)

2) Reynolds not coming back, I believe, was more with Buck and DD not being in his corner then it was money. They would have brought him back for cheap, but I'm not sure either like Reynolds as a player.

Peter Angelos: Isn't he the one who keeps making the mess with those seeds?

Dan Duquette: I like Mark Reynolds, I just didn't like the price of his contract. We looked at a lot of ways to fit him into the team, but I don't know that we're going to be able to do that.

Buck: He's got a lot of "Want To."

Nicole Sherry: I have two extra groundskeepers to take care of that mess.

Peter Angelos: Isn't he the one with the long hair and that thing that looks like a beard?

Dan Duquette: I know we have some people in-house that are very capable of doing that job

Buck: He left me hanging.

Nicole: I could save you some money. Maybe I could even get that ivy to grow again.

Peter: I like Ivy.

Dan Duquette: They have Ivy in Chicago.

Buck: I hear Hamilton is going to get 25 million a year.

Peter: How much does this messy guy want?

Dan: 11 million

Peter: Good it is settled, sign someone for two million. And I want to improve the team by making them play better for what we are paying them. The Uniforms. Players must get very hot in the polyester. You know, it's not a natural fibre. I think they would prefer cotton.

Buck: Cotton, huh?

Peter: Yeah. Cotton breathes, you see, it's much softer. Imagine playing games and your team is five degrees cooler than the other team. Don't you think that would be an advantage? They're cooler, they're more comfortable...they're happier - they're gonna play better.

Buck: Hmm. Cotton uniforms.

Peter: Well it is all settled. Can you send Russell in?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Detroit 2006.

Magglio Ord??ez and Troy Percival.

MSK

Detroit won the 2006 World Series? Somebody better tell the Cardinals to give their rings back.

Edit: Ordonez is an odd choice anyway, since bb-ref has him as worth 11.5 WAR total over the 7 years of his contract (and that includes 6.9 WAR in 2007). Hard to say he was worth that contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's definitely one. Notice how the Yanks/Red Sox disclaimer was used. That takes away CC Sabathia, Manny Ramirez, Roger Clemens, David Cone...

Now if you want to add guys who added significantly to their payroll via trade you have Matt Holiday, Curt Schilling...

I used that disclaimer because we will NEVER have a payroll as high as the Yankees, nor as high as the Sox were a couple years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know they didn't win. My point is that FAs got them to a whole other level.

MSK

You've been stating that all that matters is a world series win. What DD did last offseason got us to "a whole other level", and none of that included top free agents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Detroit won the 2006 World Series? Somebody better tell the Cardinals to give their rings back.

Edit: Ordonez is an odd choice anyway, since bb-ref has him as worth 11.5 WAR total over the 7 years of his contract (and that includes 6.9 WAR in 2007). Hard to say he was worth that contract.

I know they didn't win. My point is that FAs got them to a whole other level.

MSK

I know the question was being taken literally, but I actually agree with MSK more here. There main difference between making the playoffs and winning the World Series is luck (or whatever term you wish to use for "getting hot at the right time and matching up well with your opponents").

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the question was being taken literally, but I actually agree with MSK more here. There main difference between making the playoffs and winning the World Series is luck (or whatever term you wish to use for "getting hot at the right time and matching up well with your opponents").

You could of said the same thing about the Orioles last year with the roster they had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reynolds radically underperformed for most of the year, as did Hardy and Andino. Flaherty was useless for 3/4 of the season. Weiters is debatable, I'll grant you that. Injuries were rampant. Reimold missed almost the entire year, and Markakis missed over a third of it. Reynolds also missed a good bit of time. Even our backups like Nick Johnson and Taylor Teagarden were out for large chunks of time. Steve Tolleson, Omar Quintanilla, Lew Ford, and Endy Chavez started for weeks at a time and Betemit got 100 PAs against lefties because there just wasn't anyone else available.

And we still won 93 games. It's hard to imagine so many things going wrong again this year, especially with the depth that has been added- and I'm sure DD isn't done.

I wouldn't say Reynolds underperformed radically.

2011- .221/.323/.483/.806 37HR 75BB 196K

2012- .221/.335/.429/.763 23HR 73BB 159K

The only thing that was abnormal was his HR. If he would have hit 7 more HR, and had another 30 HR season, we wouldn't be discussing his offense. And I firmly believe that he would have hit 30, if not for missing 27 games due to injury. We still don't know how bad Reynold's was hurting when he did play, so 35+HR probably would have been likely. He still got on base at a .335 clip, he just wasn't driving the ball. And that's what oblique and arm injuries do to you.

I just think the 2013 team would be better off with Reynold's at 1B and Davis at DH. Just my opinion. I'd feel better with Reynold's batting 7th, than any combination of Betemit/Pearce/Valencia/Reimold.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say Reynolds underperformed radically.

2011- .221/.323/.483/.806 37HR 75BB 196K

2012- .221/.335/.429/.763 23HR 73BB 159K

The only thing that was abnormal was his HR. If he would have hit 7 more HR, and had another 30 HR season, we wouldn't be discussing his offense. And I firmly believe that he would have hit 30, if not for missing 27 games due to injury. We still don't know how bad Reynold's was hurting when he did play, so 35+HR probably would have been likely. He still got on base at a .335 clip, he just wasn't driving the ball. And that's what oblique and arm injuries do to you.

I just think the 2013 team would be better off with Reynold's at 1B and Davis at DH. Just my opinion. I'd feel better with Reynold's batting 7th, than any combination of Betemit/Pearce/Valencia/Reimold.

Take out that 3-4 week stretch and he OPS under 700.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say Reynolds underperformed radically.

2011- .221/.323/.483/.806 37HR 75BB 196K

2012- .221/.335/.429/.763 23HR 73BB 159K

The only thing that was abnormal was his HR. If he would have hit 7 more HR, and had another 30 HR season, we wouldn't be discussing his offense. And I firmly believe that he would have hit 30, if not for missing 27 games due to injury. We still don't know how bad Reynold's was hurting when he did play, so 35+HR probably would have been likely. He still got on base at a .335 clip, he just wasn't driving the ball. And that's what oblique and arm injuries do to you.

I just think the 2013 team would be better off with Reynold's at 1B and Davis at DH. Just my opinion. I'd feel better with Reynold's batting 7th, than any combination of Betemit/Pearce/Valencia/Reimold.

Is that your only complaint about the offseason is not bringing back Reynolds? You like to kind of dance around your opinions and not just come out and say how you feel. You kind of want Hamilton but you aren't sure what you want to give him but this team won't win next year as it is constructed and we need upgrades over what we had last year but you want Reynolds and Davis both back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Yea.  I feel the same way.  I really do not care strongly one way or another.  Sure, I think it's kind of ugly.  I also think HR's came pretty cheap before.  I like the exciting defensive plays it fosters and of course the random triple & odd carom make for some fun and unique moments.  But I don't think it helps or hurts the team in any substantial way short of helping out the pitching a little.   I sure don't think the players are changing their approaches.  If they keep it as is, that's fine with me.  If they modify it some way, that's fine with me as well.  It does seem like there is some opportunity for some unique seats down there by modifying it slightly.  When I first saw it, it almost appeared like a construction Phase 1.  That might be reasoning for pushing it back so far, allows them some flexibility in the future.   I also don't buy that a Free Agent RH hitter is going to care at all about the wall.   They are getting paid regardless.  I'd think that 1-maximizing payday 2-playing for a winner 3-finding a location that suits your family would be your priorities and your long-term stat line would be very close to the bottom of your list of concerns.  
    • His "ability to play RF" carries about $0 value
    • Yeah but if you think most of this money is going to upgrade things that are wrong or need improving, such as the ones @accinfo lists, I think you'll be disappointed.   They will be for new features, each one designed to create revenue via premium seating or premium "experience" areas or attractions that bring non baseball fans to the park to spend or sports betting related things. I'm not saying they won't fix some basic things that need it like upgrading the sound system or improving the point of sale technology.   I'm sure they will.   But the focus is going to be on the new attractions which are all designed with revenue enhancement in mind.
    • I’m not a lawyer … perhaps @Frobbymight know. Loss of income, future revenues? Damage to their franchise….Even with MASN the Orioles lost a ton on annual tv revenues
    • Congrats to the offense on playing a heck of a game. Lamar was incredible to watch, especially the play when the snap ended up on the ground and he had to run away towards the sideline and still found Likely for the score. It's very frustrating to me that the offense HAD to play so well because of the poor coaching and abysmal defensive play.  It's odd to me that Harbaugh still messes up timeout usage after being a coach in the league for over 15 years.
    • Can someone in 150 words or less explain to me what DYAR is?
    • I have a 3 hour round trip to get to games. I can't speak about other directions, but the stadium is very easy to get to from the south...some more traffic with the earlier start times, but overall - games are VERY easy to get to, imo. You don't have the hike through the city to get to games. I'm a rural guy, and it's really not a big deal. We took the light rail from Cromwell for Game 1 (I usually park in BC or FGH) and it was a breeze. We walked out right after the game, and we immediately caught a direct bus that took us back to Cromwell directly. We did the same thing last year. I gotta be honest - I think the "they've been horrible for half the season" reasoning is pretty lame. Even when they were down (and dealing with significant injuries) after the AS break, they were still essentially a lock to make the playoffs. Then they get healthy-ish with some key guys back riiiiight before the playoffs and look great for a couple of series - but I guess it was too late for everyone?  Come on.  Just say you didn't feel like it. But don't blame August play for not showing up in October.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...