Jump to content

Season Ticket Prices Going Up


OrangeJerseys

Recommended Posts

Ah yes. Pricing. Marketing. This is truly the chicken and egg issue of it all. Income per attendee is a benchmark. But multipliers are a bellwether. The trick is getting income per attendee up and increasing percentage of attendees, on a predictable basis to allow for proper staffing and minimal waste. And producing the appropriate on-field results to keep attendance up through out the entire season. And how much investment in the team produces diminishing results on the bottom line. It is a much more difficult math problem than you would initially suspect. and I do not see that the Orioles have effectively be ahead on this curve until recently. I do see a whole lot less knee jerk management through the Orioles organization over the last five years.

In 2012, our attendance benefited from an improved team, the statues and the incredibly generous promotions with deep price discounts during the playoff drive. Those statues and the accompanying ceremonies were awesome and add nicely to the OPACY experience. I expect the statues cost some pretty good coin.

In 2013, with increased attendance, no statues, no deep discount promotions, no creativity from the marketing department for August and September games. It is like the marketing department took the entire year off.

Anyway, that's a part of the operation. This starts at the top and I'm not saying PA has to maximize profits to the very last drop, but I think he leaves a lot of $ on the table in the way the business is directed/managed and that clearly hurts the product on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Bullspit Steve ....I've heard this two or three years ago! Angelos has the money to increase payroll right now if he wants to.

This is another mouthpiece post by an Orioles employee to give Angelos more time to be cheap!

Well, they did do this, didn't they?

Attendance is up from 1.7M and payroll is up for $87M. Not saying the payroll can't go higher, cause I think it can go much higher and PA can still make good $, but payroll has gone up as attendenace has gone up, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they had announced a 10% increase after 2012, there probably would have been less complaining than the 5% increase this week. Lousy timing.

Well, they did do this, didn't they?

Attendance is up from 1.7M and payroll is up for $87M. Not saying the payroll can't go higher, cause I think it can go much higher and PA can still make good $, but payroll has gone up as attendenace has gone up, no?

If you can make the direct correlation between attendance and payroll, particularly during the losing streak, you're better than me.
1997	$54,871,399	3,711,1321998	$70,408,134 	3,684,6501999	$70,818,363 	3,433,1502000	$83,141,198 	3,297,0312001	$74,279,540 	3,094,8412002	$60,493,487 	2,682,4392003	$73,877,500 	2,454,5232004	$51,623,333 	2,744,0182005	$73,914,333 	2,624,7402006	$72,585,582 	2,153,1392007	$93,554,808 	2,164,8222008	$67,196,246 	1,950,0752009	$67,101,666 	1,907,1632010	$81,612,500 	1,733,0182011	$85,304,038 	1,746,4112012	$81,428,499 	2,102,2402013	$91,793,333 	2,357,561
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If they had announced a 10% increase after 2012, there probably would have been less complaining than the 5% increase this week. Lousy timing.

If you can make the direct correlation between attendance and payroll, particularly during the losing streak, you're better than me.

1997	$54,871,399	3,711,1321998	$70,408,134 	3,684,6501999	$70,818,363 	3,433,1502000	$83,141,198 	3,297,0312001	$74,279,540 	3,094,8412002	$60,493,487 	2,682,4392003	$73,877,500 	2,454,5232004	$51,623,333 	2,744,0182005	$73,914,333 	2,624,7402006	$72,585,582 	2,153,1392007	$93,554,808 	2,164,8222008	$67,196,246 	1,950,0752009	$67,101,666 	1,907,1632010	$81,612,500 	1,733,0182011	$85,304,038 	1,746,4112012	$81,428,499 	2,102,2402013	$91,793,333 	2,357,561

I'm a little surprised that attendance isn't quite as high as it was for the '04-'05 teams, and yet the performance of the team and the payroll far surpasses them. Also, look at that horrible '07 budget with that high investment towards middle relief.. ugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you can make the direct correlation between attendance and payroll, particularly during the losing streak, you're better than me.

Not sure I understand your issue here, you posted earlier that comments were made by our FO that we needed better attendance to drive higher payroll; then you say there is no correlation between payroll and attendance. What is there to analyze?

The Os haven't taken payroll above $94M. Hopefully, the increased attendance from recent years combined with $ from the new TV deal will get payroll to the $100M-$110M neighborhood this year.

Separately, if one starts at $95M and adds $20M for the new MLB contract, $20M for the upper end of the market value of the Os TV rights and $20+M for attendance in the 3.25M neighborhood, I think the Os can support a payroll in the $150M range. Perhaps higher even if attendance gets to 3.7M.

The only thing I can see from the numbers is that the Os haven't take attendance above $95M. Hopefully improved attendance the past few years will result in a higher payroll

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the plan info is up on the site. A little confusing with all these different pricing plans.

http://baltimore.orioles.mlb.com/bal/ticketing/season.jsp

http://baltimore.orioles.mlb.com/bal/downloads/y2014/seating_chart.pdf

I just looked at this and I don't see anywhere how much the 13 game plans cost. To me this is totally confusing. It seems less of a benefit this year ot having season tickets. Last year I had tickets in section 14 and I could buy tickets in that section any game for 32 dollars. It appears that some games could cost me as much as 56 dollars. Well perhaps even more than that as the prices could go up. I think the whole thing is insane. Seems like just because other teams are making bad pricing decisions the Orioles will do so as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just looked at this and I don't see anywhere how much the 13 game plans cost. To me this is totally confusing. It seems less of a benefit this year ot having season tickets. Last year I had tickets in section 14 and I could buy tickets in that section any game for 32 dollars. It appears that some games could cost me as much as 56 dollars. Well perhaps even more than that as the prices could go up. I think the whole thing is insane. Seems like just because other teams are making bad pricing decisions th Orioles will do so as well.

I think you basically have to add them up. Plan B is supposes to be the cheapest 13 game plan. The 13 game plans all have different numbers of value. Classic games etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Hopefully Hyde will strongly remind of that fact. 
    • Generally it allows the runner to slide well outside home plate and just swipe the hand to tag home, which doesn’t present much of a target.  
    • I doubt the O’s will look past it, given that Oakland just beat the Yankees 2 out of 4 in the Bronx.   
    • You know life is good when there are threads like these. Burnes + our lineup tonight. Wow
    • In 26 games, the A’s have scored 4+ runs only 9 times, and 5+ only 3 times.  The O’s have been held under 4 runs only 4 times and under 5 runs only 10 times in 24 games.   
    • I think of it as a "trap series" because it would be easy to look past it for the Yankees coming to town on Monday. 
    • I'll accept that! Now that we've gotten that out of the way, that's kind of a carte blanche to keep on about Jigger Statz and the '22 Cubs. I knew I'd heard Statz' name, and it's because he spent about 18 years playing for the Los Angeles Angels in the old Pacific Coast League when it was pretty close to being a 3rd major before the actual majors expanded to the west coast. He played off and on for them from the age of 22 to 28, then every year from age 31-44. He had 3356 hits in the PCL, hit .315, almost 600 doubles. Many, many players in that era had long careers in the PCL or the American Association or International League. A lot of them every bit as good as guys who had 15-year MLB careers. This was the same timeframe where the Orioles were winning seven straight IL titles with teams that certainly could have finished mid-pack in the AL/NL. Other '22 Cubs included Hack Miller, who looked like Hack Wilson or a fire hydrant (take your pick), and played many years for Oakland in the PCL. Zeb Terry played four years for the Angels. Ray Grimes had almost 4000 minor league PAs. Hooks Cotter played 10+ years in the high minors. Joe Klugman spent a decade in the Southern Association. That would have been a great era to follow, with 16 MLB teams, but countless other really competitive teams just a notch below. And this was mostly before affiliations took hold, so these teams were all trying their darnedest to win. They weren't just 3-month stopovers for the Cards and Dodgers' best prospects. If you were in Baltimore in 1922 and you ask 100 kids who their team was, it was overwhelmingly going to be the Orioles. Not the Senators or Yanks or whatever, but the home town team.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...