Jump to content

Yanks get Tanaka 7y/$155M


isestrex

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 257
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Gotta love baseball's competitive balance. What a joke.

the Yankees lineup is still remarkably old and riddled with holes. Tanaka is a good get, but honestly, I still don't see the Yankees being demonstratively better this year with him.

Tanaka would have been more dangerous on a team like the Tigers, or the Royals. In New York he is going to be pitching every fifth day for a team with a complete dearth of offense and some pretty bad infield defense behind him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question: Is Tanaka really that much better than Darvish?

Darvish: $51 mm posting fee and 6/$56 mm contract

Tanaka: $20 mm posting fee and 7/$155 mm contract with an opt out.

Either Tanaka is much more highly regarded, or the old posting system really screwed Darvish by forcing him to negotiate with only one team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That means the Yankees will blow past the 189m team salary. That means they will keep spending.

Again, the $189 was a goal; never a mandate. And once they go over it the LT is what it is. So they may as well blow the doors off the payroll because they'll get hit with the LT whether they are $1 over or $20M over. They're not done yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question: Is Tanaka really that much better than Darvish?

Darvish: $51 mm posting fee and 6/$56 mm contract

Tanaka: $20 mm posting fee and 7/$155 mm contract with an opt out.

Either Tanaka is much more highly regarded, or the old posting system really screwed Darvish by forcing him to negotiate with only one team.

Tanaka is a talented pitcher, but is not really on Darvish's level. Yu got screwed royally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question: Is Tanaka really that much better than Darvish?

Darvish: $51 mm posting fee and 6/$56 mm contract

Tanaka: $20 mm posting fee and 7/$155 mm contract with an opt out.

Either Tanaka is much more highly regarded, or the old posting system really screwed Darvish by forcing him to negotiate with only one team.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>He's very talented. But he's not Darvish. RT <a href="https://twitter.com/Jose_Consuervo">@Jose_Consuervo</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/ProfessorParks">@ProfessorParks</a> Tanaka isn't nearly as talented as darvish is he?</p>— Jason Parks (@ProfessorParks) <a href="https://twitter.com/ProfessorParks/statuses/426008458375077888">January 22, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the Yankees lineup is still remarkably old and riddled with holes. Tanaka is a good get, but honestly, I still don't see the Yankees being demonstratively better this year with him.

Tanaka would have been more dangerous on a team like the Tigers, or the Royals. In New York he is going to be pitching every fifth day for a team with a complete dearth of offense...

So Jacoby Ellsbury, Brian McCann, and Carlos Beltran are just so much chopped meat?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Question: Is Tanaka really that much better than Darvish?

Darvish: $51 mm posting fee and 6/$56 mm contract

Tanaka: $20 mm posting fee and 7/$155 mm contract with an opt out.

Either Tanaka is much more highly regarded, or the old posting system really screwed Darvish by forcing him to negotiate with only one team.

Do you get the idea that the negotiations were Darvish-like and then the Yankees just came in and doubled everyone else's bid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...