Jump to content

AJ's approach: Are you fine with it?


tettleton14

Recommended Posts

Wait a minute...

a .285 BA is close to a .323 ?!?!?!..... No way in hell man... Trouts numbers in 2013 were MVP like, Jones not even close.

If you look at 2014 Jones is hitting .300 compared to trout .310. Trout is a better player but nobody is saying aj is better, just that aj is awesome and hangouters should appreciate that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Jones contract runs through age 32, at which point an average player is at an average of 90-couple percent of their peak production. I'm not particularly concerned about his later decline phase, and won't be unless they resign him to a unjustifiable extension.

I think depending what we have in place at that point in center, he could extend his career as a COF.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that's pretty likely. Range has never been his strongest attribute, and by the time he's in his mid-30s he'll probably have to slide to a corner.

His arm would profile well there and I think he'd still have range that would make him a + for a COF.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simple question, but I know it's a point of contention. Would you want Adam to become more selective (say, walking 2-3x as much as he does) or are you just fine and dandy with what he currently is. I can see both sides. He's clearly well aware of his free-swinging mentality and openly talks about it.

I'm firmly on team #simplyaj10 and don't want him to change anything, as he gets better every year, is consistent and you never know how becoming more selective would affect the rest of his production.

The guy belted two HR's last night and won the game, he is who he is, a productive CF like his approach or not.

Let's put it this way there are A LOT of MLB TEAMS that would LOVE TO HAVE AJ and his present approach to the game ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait a minute...

a .285 BA is close to a .323 ?!?!?!..... No way in hell man... Trouts numbers in 2013 were MVP like, Jones not even close.

How many Gold Gloves does Trout have? Jones defensive stats have been higher the last 2 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you look at 2014 Jones is hitting .300 compared to trout .310. Trout is a better player but nobody is saying aj is better, just that aj is awesome and hangouters should appreciate that.

If Trout was an Oriole people on here would be complaining about some part of his game as well. Jones has a lot more personality than Trout. Anyway who cares. If Jones is a top 10 player in the league that should be good enough for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Trout was an Oriole people on here would be complaining about some part of his game as well. Jones has a lot more personality than Trout. Anyway who cares. If Jones is a top 10 player in the league that should be good enough for everyone.

No one is complaining at Jones. He's getting better and better each season. Sure he has a few flaws in his game but we are all thankful he extended his time here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy belted two HR's last night and won the game, he is who he is, a productive CF like his approach or not.

Let's put it this way EVERY MLB TEAM would LOVE TO HAVE AJ and his present approach to the game ;)

Every One of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add to this, I don't know of any evidence that players with poor plate discipline age better or worse than those with good plate discipline. You can find a fair number of players out of the Adam Jones mold who had very long careers. I mentioned Clemente. Andre Dawson is another example. Miguel Tejada, at 35, hit .313 with 46 doubles, had a 110 OPS+, made the All Star team, got some down-ballot MVP support... and walked a completely unacceptable 19 times in 685 PAs. Marquis Grissom was still a pretty good outfielder at 36, despite 20 walks in over 600 PAs. And, of course, Vlad had less than 500 unintentional walks in his entire 16-year career yet was pretty productive right up until the moment the Orioles acquired him.

I think Vlad is a good example of why using BB% to measure plate discipline can be misleading. Guerrero, for all his terribly free-swinging ways, isn't going to swing at 4 pitches in the left-handed batter's box. The key for Jones to draw more walks is to hit more home runs.

edit: to answer the OP's question, I am fine with Jones' approach as long as he doesn't start pressing when the opposing team starts throwing him junk. With Davis and Cruz slumping behind him, it's bound to happen. His walk rate will come around if he keeps hitting. He is clearly making strides in recognizing and laying off the junk. I think that his lack of walks is partly because he's just not missing the ball when it's in the zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Vlad is a good example of why using BB% to measure plate discipline can be misleading. Guerrero, for all his terribly free-swinging ways, isn't going to swing at 4 pitches in the left-handed batter's box. The key for Jones to draw more walks is to hit more home runs.

Only because he is going to put the second one into play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only because he is going to put the second one into play.

Only like 20% of the time. The other 80% of the time he takes a walk. He did have 3 seasons with a >10% walk rate. Even if 1/3 of those walks were IBB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
    • Gunnar’s base running is in the 99th percentile.  That mess is in the 98th percentile.
    • Yeah, the highlighted section here is really why I agree that the O's will look to minimize losing players to waivers just yet. Things could blow up on them pretty quick. There's a ton of risk with these moves, but they have to find out. The best way to do that is to utilize the options for Akin and Tate, IMO. We'll see! 
    • There are some in this very thread including responses to my post up top. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...