Jump to content

My beef with fantasy rankings....


WarehouseChatter

Recommended Posts

Maybe I'm just a homer and I know I shouldn't care, but I am perturbed by the fantasy ranks by position released by Brad Johnson at Fangraphs. The highest position ranking we received is Steve Pearce (12th at 1B). I would love to know your thoughts. I posted an article about it at WarehouseChatter questioning the rankings and a related article specific to Adam Jones and his "upcoming demise". Again, would love to get your thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantasy Baseball valuations are going to be entirely weighted towards the hitting skills of the player. I think he already had to specifically address that he had Jones lower than people thought was appropriate.

In general lots of our players wouldn't make great fantasy guys - either they have lots of value from their defense (Machado and Hardy), or they're coming off down years or particularly exceptional years (Wieters, Pearce, Davis).

Our pitchers also tend to rely on the defense helping them out, rather than getting strikeouts. This leads to pitchers with relatively high WHIP and not enough Ks to make up for it.

The Orioles can be a good actual baseball team and yet have very few good 'fantasy' players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm just a homer and I know I shouldn't care, but I am perturbed by the fantasy ranks by position released by Brad Johnson at Fangraphs. The highest position ranking we received is Steve Pearce (12th at 1B). I would love to know your thoughts. I posted an article about it at WarehouseChatter questioning the rankings and a related article specific to Adam Jones and his "upcoming demise". Again, would love to get your thoughts.

There is no reason to get angry over fantasy baseball rankings. If you are in a fantasy league and strongly believe that a player is being undervalued by the "fantasy experts", that is a good thing. You can then generally draft that player or win him at auction, depending on your league format, cheaper than if he was rated more highly by the touts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/ranking-adam-jones-for-the-2015-fantasy-baseball-season/

He did a write up yesterday about why he ranked Jones so low

Without any stats on a page – just names – I see nothing out of the ordinary including him in a cohort with Matt Holliday, Kole Calhoun, Yoenis Cespedes, and Brandon Moss. Those seem like fine companions for a hyper-aggressive hitter with whiff issues.

what

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.fangraphs.com/fantasy/ranking-adam-jones-for-the-2015-fantasy-baseball-season/

He did a write up yesterday about why he ranked Jones so low

what

Weird. Because many fantasy set ups don't take OBP into account, so his "hyper aggressive approach" is a benefit with counting stats.

That actually reads like he knows he goofed and will try to slide Jones up later, while hoping nobody notices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fantasy Baseball valuations are going to be entirely weighted towards the hitting skills of the player. I think he already had to specifically address that he had Jones lower than people thought was appropriate.

In general lots of our players wouldn't make great fantasy guys - either they have lots of value from their defense (Machado and Hardy), or they're coming off down years or particularly exceptional years (Wieters, Pearce, Davis).

Our pitchers also tend to rely on the defense helping them out, rather than getting strikeouts. This leads to pitchers with relatively high WHIP and not enough Ks to make up for it.

The Orioles can be a good actual baseball team and yet have very few good 'fantasy' players.

Not only are they 100% based on hitting stats, but 20% of the value is completely based on steals, which is something the Orioles don't excel in.

So they don't factor in defense at all, and we are one of the best defensive teams in baseball.

And 20% of the value is based solely on steals, something we are near the bottom of the league in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only are they 100% based on hitting stats, but 20% of the value is completely based on steals, which is something the Orioles don't excel in.

So they don't factor in defense at all, and we are one of the best defensive teams in baseball.

And 20% of the value is based solely on steals, something we are near the bottom of the league in.

Fantasy stats have nothing to do with what makes a team good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I hope the front office knows the Frazier signing was super dumb use of resources when you have top IF talent like Westburg.
    • Really enjoyed seeing Wells' confidence today.  Looked great. 
    • Taking what I have seen from ST and past performance: 1)  Grayson Rodriguez -  He is not there yet but over the course of 2023 I think he become the staff ace.   I am not even sure he makes the rotation to begin the season but he has the best stuff and makeup to be the O's best starter. 100 IP   3.50 ERA  2) DL Hall -  He is changing from a thrower to a pitchers.  His pitches are off the chart but he has to calm down.  Still has to master his pitches from the stretch.   Begins as AAA but he is likely to find his control early in the season. TOR Starter in the making. 100 IP   3.50 ERA 3) Kyle Bradish  -  Has the pitches and the durability.  Will blow up now and then but overall he has he stuff to beat any team on a given day.   Will be going deep in games soon.  #2 stuff. 170 IP   3.28 ERA (like 2nd half) 4) Dean Kremer -  Growing into a solid starter.   His stuff is there.   #3 Stuff 160 IP  3.23 ERA (like last year) 5) John Means -   Former All Star just need to get healthy.  See him in July.  May be better in 2024 than in 2023.  #3 stuff 75 IP  3.81 ERA (Career ERA) 6) Tyler Wells -  He goes 5 inning and allow 1 run, he could be in the rotation to begin the season.   Average fastball but he has 5 pitches.  #4 starter stuff 130 IP   3.38 ERA  (last year 1st half) 7)   Cole Irvin -  I have enjoyed watching him this spring but he is only facing AAA competition.   I still need to understand  why he had a 5.29 ERA away from Oakland Stadium.   #5  Capable of  180 IP    4.20 ERA 8  Kyle Gibson -  The O's defense, the Wall and Holt/Holmes  coaching will help him but he is only a #5.   Similar to Jordan Lyles. May be traded in July for  a prospect. 100 IP   4.32 ERA 9)  Spenser Watkins -  Good backup starter who pitches better as a starter than a reliever.  Will probably not see a lot of time in the majors.  Capable of 140 IP  4.17 ERA as a starter but will probably not get that opportunity in the majors. 10)  Voth  - Probably a mid/long reliever and swing man.   Had a nice year as a starter for the O's last year.  3.04 ERA  (like last season) 11) Bruce Zimmermann -  Looks better this spring but I really can't place him after last years performance.      
    • "He's a funny guy, that parrot, isn't he?" "He sure is."
    • Wells was very good today. Grayson was great last year in triple a and is obviously a top prospect, but you’d be hard pressed to say he was one of the orioles top 5 starters this spring 
    • Have watched every game that's been on TV, whether by MASN or the other networks.  Currently watching Pittsburgh Sportsnet broadcast.  Have listened to every game but 2, followed the last Grayson Rodriguez game on Gameday which was incredibly tedious, as they didn't note each pitch, only the outcome of each at bat.  Before I met weams, I used to say I'd never meet anyone who'd put up with the amount of baseball I watch -- he was my perfect match, watched just as much as I did!  But then, you guys knew that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...