Jump to content

Is Jones endorsing an OF of Parra, Jones, Alvarez?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I think they should trade Britton for Ethier and cash and play him in RF. Great OBP and left-handed. Dodgers are in desperate need of bullpen help and they have too many outfielders.

Parra does nothing for me. If they sign him to a three year deal, he might be worse in 2017 than Markakis.

I have no interest in Either. Especially for someone good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Unfortunately I don't see the O's acquiring an outfielder better than Parra. Who do you think the O's will sign that is better for the O's OF?

I'll take a random guy on a 1/2.5 contract over Parra and his contract.

I think he is a significant risk to be a replacement level player going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll take a random guy on a 1/2.5 contract over Parra and his contract.

I think he is a significant risk to be a replacement level player going forward.

That is what Reimold or Peace are. Dan may sign a lefthanded hitting guy like that but I think it will be in addition to trying to sign Parra.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think we need a discussion on Parra.

Parra is not a replacement level player. Platoon player probably but not a replacement level player.

I looked at Parra's last three years. Here are his averages for 2013-2015.

559 AB, 75 R, 153 H, 11 HR, 46 RBI, 11 SB, 274/320/418/738*

Splits

Right 433 AB, 64 R, 126 H, 10 HR, 38 RBI, 291/329/448/777*

Left 126 AB, 11 R, 27 H, 1 HR, 9 RBI, 0 SB, 214/293/279/572*

79% of Parra's at bats over the last three years have been versus right handed pitching. A .291 average and a .777 OPS is not replacement level.

Parra does not lefties. Its pretty clear.

So are the O's likely to overpay for Parra as platoon player? Yes, but then again the vast majority of the FAs will be overpaid. That is the nature of free agency.

I can see the O's signing Parra for his 777 OPS vs righties.

Parra did not hit for the O's for the last two months because he was not familiar with the pitchers in the AL. More at bats versus AL pitchers should fix that.

As far as Parra's defense. I doesn't think he should backup center. But he has enough range for either corner from what I saw. He doesn't hit the cut off man but Kirby and Buck should fix that in ST.

* These averages are not completely accurate. I just added the last three year averages together and divided by three. I didn't calculate them. If anything these averages are a little low because 2014 was Parra worst year when he batted fewer times and I weighted it the same as the other year were he batted more times.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • If you're projecting a future lineup without Mullins in 2026, then EBJ is a reasonable placeholder name to put in there. I would assume most people understand that it's not a sure thing to work out that way. 
    • Every year players are injured sliding head first into bags or even worse home plate. Just noticed that EBJ has a head injury from sliding head first into home (really dangerous and stupid) I'll say it again, what analytics driven organization will be the first to ban head first slides for all of their players I remember when David Sequi was a decent player and ended his career with a serious hand injury sliding head/hand first into home. Cal never slid head first, and wouldn't have been the iron man if he did.
    • Oh, I don't know. I thought when accusing someone of wild malpractice over possibly, maybe, slightly speeding up highlights that kind of opened the door to a little goofy exaggeration.
    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...