Jump to content

Has Chris Carter set Pedro Alvarez's market price?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

[A.J. Reed] doesn't have an at-bat yet in Triple-A, so don't be surprised to see him start in Fresno and reach Houston at some point, especially if the Jon Singleton-Matt Duffy-Tyler White triumvirate isn't working out.

This speaks volumes about the value of Chris Carter. With Singleton/Duffy/White as their alternative, the Astros non-tendered Carter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 85
  • Created
  • Last Reply
So an agent can never represent two free agents who play the same position at the same time, right? Sorry, but it just doesn't work that way. If Alvarez doesn't feel his interests are being served, he can change agents.

I am not saying there is a good solution, just that it is a conflict of interest, and yes, if I am Alvarez I am getting another agent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One could argue, Trumbo platoon with Pedro Alvarez for $15 million for just one year is the wise financial investement vs Chris Davis at 7/150.

Alvarez career OPS vs RHP: .794

Trumbo career OPS vs LHP: .824

Chris Davis career OPS: .835 (albeit with high variance)

Trumbo is not a slouch vs RHP so he certainly wouldn't be in a pure platoon, he is the everyday 1B.

Justin Upton career OPS: .825 (low variance) and plus defense

One could certainly argue a wiser use of money is sign Upton as your everyday LF for the foreseeable future. Make that your big investment.

Sign Pedro Alvarez on something short term, say 1/5 or 2/8 and use him primarily as a LH platoon DH who plays some OF/3B/1B when necessity requires it.

Trumbo is your regular 1B and sometimes DH for 2016 at $9 million.

On the other hand Trumbo + Davis saves a roster spot and should produce more SLG and dingers while sacrificing some outfield defense.

OR :vader: Angelos just goes all in and signs Davis AND Upton and we all dance in the streets until both those contracts are in year 6 and we decide to follow DC United to save our sanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure he will do the bare minimum to fulfill his legal and professional obligations, but there is a reason that people have to recuse themselves in every other walk of life when they have a conflict of interest, and there certainly is a conflict here.

Yeah, the way this market is shaping up, perhaps Boras will be made to look like, well, a "Borass" if he can't get the big money for his guys. But he always seems to land on his feet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't say that at all. Trumbo, by stats, has value at 1B. He's worth 8-9M at 1B if the defensive metrics are correct. Not sure what you mean by the Travis Snider line.

I thought you were implying that he was like Travis Snider at 1b because of him being overpaid and being not very good. My bad

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles will resign Chris Davis and put together last year's team, with a worse rotation, for a lot more money. Some people will call that a good off season.

It would not be a very good offseason, IMO. But it doesn't mean that we couldn't contend in 2016, if the breaks go our way. The rotation could do better even though it's worse on paper. The corner OF mix might work better than last year's disaster, where nothing Duquette did worked out.

In short, I won't get despondent no matter what happens this offseason. But there are some signs I don't like, either in the short or the long term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can make the argument of anything is possible and if everything goes right. You could say that of about 27 other teams. Unfortunately, an 81 win season that we had to scramble for was not of enough red flag for the team or a lot of the fans. It will take a 74-78 win season this year to convince anyone we are heading in the wrong direction once again.

I don't think "everything" needs to go right. More things need to go right than wrong.

I'm not crazy about the team's direction, but sometimes things happen that change the picture. My biggest issue with the team is that the farm system still isn't producing enough talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would not be a very good offseason, IMO. But it doesn't mean that we couldn't contend in 2016, if the breaks go our way. The rotation could do better even though it's worse on paper. The corner OF mix might work better than last year's disaster, where nothing Duquette did worked out.

In short, I won't get despondent no matter what happens this offseason. But there are some signs I don't like, either in the short or the long term.

Remember, to most people a plan that didn't work was a bad plan. Full stop. Even if more-or-less the same plan worked previously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can make the argument of anything is possible and if everything goes right. You could say that of about 27 other teams. Unfortunately, an 81 win season that we had to scramble for was not of enough red flag for the team or a lot of the fans. It will take a 74-78 win season this year to convince anyone we are heading in the wrong direction once again.

You seem convinced. Many were convinced this team was heading in a horrible direction last year, and the year before, and the year before, and the year before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember, to most people a plan that didn't work was a bad plan. Full stop. Even if more-or-less the same plan worked previously.

I feel that way about people's criticism of Duqette's corner OF moves last offseason. They didn't work, therefore they were idiotic. But in truth, they were reasonable moves that carried risk, and they didn't work out.

Sometimes you get Steve Pearce 2014, other times you get Travis Snider 2015. This time next year we could be lauding the Worley and Kim acquisitions, or we could be lampooning them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure he will do the bare minimum to fulfill his legal and professional obligations, but there is a reason that people have to recuse themselves in every other walk of life when they have a conflict of interest, and there certainly is a conflict here.

If I were Alvarez, I would consider changing agents because of this particular situation, but your claim that the agent must recuse himself in all other walks of life is false. An insurance agent handles both claims if two of his clients are involved in an auto accident. A real estate agent can be both a buying and selling agent on a sale of property. And, most similar to this case, an entertainment agent can represent two actors that are vying for the same part in a movie or play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know the off season is over half complete but its still early for Dan. He signs guys late. He trades late. If the O's add a big bats and a decent starting pitcher they will be a contender.

Then they will have replaced Parades at DH with either Trumbo or Alvarez, Kim is a question but could very well be a good OBP man in left. Wieters, and Schoop will probably have better years. Tillman and Gonzalez have a two and a half year history that says they are better than 2015.

It pretty early to be dissatisfied with the O's off season when Dan is the the VP of Baseball Operations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You seem convinced. Many were convinced this team was heading in a horrible direction last year, and the year before, and the year before, and the year before.

Last year there were a few very vocal posters who were upset about Cruz, while I think this year there is a broader consensus that the team is not in a position to contend right now. I for one was still bullish last year, but don't like what I see this year. I am not I don't think it is just a matter of certain posters who are never going to be satisfied or optimistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • JD Martinez would be a more of the same kind of acquisition. He is not an impact bat and he is a periphery (around the margins) piece at this point. Why not set the bar higher and sign Alonso? Acquiring Pete Alonso allows you to move on from Mountcastle and put Mayo (where he belongs right now) DH. It also allows you to move on from O'Hearn.  Alonso gets everyday ABs and Mayo does. Those two things to a large degree help solve the lineup imbalance against LHP. I know Alonso will cost real money. But again who are we paying? The money is there. It's time to start using it (if we want to win in October).
    • Your full quote said to use him as a DH for 100+ games. If you are worried about him being covered through his injuries - how can you assume he wouldn't be injured at the end of the season, going into the playoffs?
    • Here’s an exercise… it’s the postseason and the bases are loaded. The Santa scenario. Who on our current roster would you rather have up over JD Martinez?  Same fact pattern as Santander’s AB. 
    • I think the title of this thread told you his status
    • Why did you pare down my quote about it being for the post season and not just 162?  People, always so quick to clown someone. Lmao. Damn. At least use my whole quote bro.  If you think that we don’t need at least one proven playoff bat then that’s ok. My point is, that we have enough 1B/DH options to carry JD through his ups/downs/injuries over 162 for his experience, leadership, and playoff experience.  You can disagree, but quote me right. 
    • It's kind of amazing to me how no one knows Suarez's free agent status. I've heard it both ways. He's Schrodinger's baseball player.
    • Since JD Martinez has a career OPS of .950 in the postseason across 12 series and 151 plate appearances, I am sure our FO will have no use for him.  A veteran player who has experienced a lot of postseason success rarely helps young teams get to that next level.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...