Jump to content

The Blue Jays series, July 29-31


Frobby

Recommended Posts

The O's come into Toronto riding a three-game losing streak, and playing .500 ball in July and post-all star break. They are in a very rough offensive slump, and have played 14 games in 14 days since the break, and traveled from Baltimore to Minnesota to Toronto in the last 48 hours. The Jays are 14-7 in July, but only 6-5 since the all star break. They're well rested, having had 3 days off since the all star break, including yesterday, and they have been at home since last Friday. The Jays are 5-5 vs. the O's this year, but 3-1 at Rogers Centre. So in short, we have our work cut out for us. The matchups:

Gausman (2-7, 3.77) vs. Estrada (5-4, 2.94)

Gallardo (3-2, 5.37) vs. Happ (13-3, 3.27)

Tillman (14-3, 3.47) vs. Sanchez (11-1, 2.72)

Gausman is coming off two very good post-ASG starts, including a 7 inning shutout of Cleveland in his last start. He faced Toronto on June 10, allowing 3 runs, 2 earned in 6.1 IP and getting non-decisioned in a game we eventually lost. Estrada missed a little time in July, but came back on July 22 and allowed 2 ER in 6 IP. He got non-decisioned against the O's on April 21 despite allowing only 1 run in 5 IP, then got non decisioned again on June 10, allowing 3 runs in 6 IP against Gausman.

Gallardo has changed his approach since the break and has been much more aggressive, allowing him to go 7 and 6.2 innings in those games. He beat Toronto on June 18, allowing 2 runs in 5 IP in his first game off the DL. Happ has been on fire, posting a 1.48 ERA in July. He beat the Orioles on June 11, allowing 4 ER in 7 IP.

Tillman was having a great July until his last outing, in which he allowed 6 earned runs (though with some shaky defensive plays contributing) in 5 IP. He's faced Toronto twice this year, getting non-decisioned in a win on April 21 while allowing 2 runs in 6 IP, and picking up a cheap win on June 18 despite allowing 4 ER in 5 IP. Sanchez is red hot, carrying a 1.33 ERA in July and winning 10 straight decisions. He got two wins against the Orioles on June 12 and 17, allowing 6 runs in 5 IP in the first one and 2 runs (1 earned) in 6 IP in the second. The Jays scored 23 runs in those two games.

Toronto's offense has been hot in July (.785 OPS, 118 runs in 21 games), but a little cooler since the ASB (.708 OPS, 54 runs in 11 games). Their bullpen has been up and down depending on the pitcher. Brett Cecil and Jesse Chavez have been struggling but everyone else has been looking very good.

Bottom line -- this is an extremely dangerous series for the Orioles. Hopefully we can eke out a win or two, but it's going to be challenging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's come into Toronto riding a three-game losing streak, and playing .500 ball in July and post-all star break. They are in a very rough offensive slump, and have played 14 games in 14 days since the break, and traveled from Baltimore to Minnesota to Toronto in the last 48 hours. The Jays are 14-7 in July, but only 6-5 since the all star break. They're well rested, having had 3 days off since the all star break, including yesterday, and they have been at home since last Friday. The Jays are 5-5 vs. the O's this year, but 3-1 at Rogers Centre. So in short, we have our work cut out for us. The matchups:

Gausman (2-7, 3.77) vs. Estrada (5-4, 2.94)

Gallardo (3-2, 5.37) vs. Happ (13-3, 3.27)

Tillman (14-3, 3.47) vs. Sanchez (11-1, 2.72)

Gausman is coming off two very good post-ASG starts, including a 7 inning shutout of Cleveland in his last start. He faced Toronto on June 10, allowing 3 runs, 2 earned in 6.1 IP and getting non-decisioned in a game we eventually lost. Estrada missed a little time in July, but came back on July 22 and allowed 2 ER in 6 IP. He got non-decisioned against the O's on April 21 despite allowing only 1 run in 5 IP, then got non decisioned again on June 10, allowing 3 runs in 6 IP against Gausman.

Gallardo has changed his approach since the break and has been much more aggressive, allowing him to go 7 and 6.2 innings in those games. He beat Toronto on June 18, allowing 2 runs in 5 IP in his first game off the DL. Happ has been on fire, posting a 1.48 ERA in July. He beat the Orioles on June 11, allowing 4 ER in 7 IP.

Tillman was having a great July until his last outing, in which he allowed 6 earned runs (though with some shaky defensive plays contributing) in 5 IP. He's faced Toronto twice this year, getting non-decisioned in a win on April 21 while allowing 2 runs in 6 IP, and picking up a cheap win on June 18 despite allowing 4 ER in 5 IP. Sanchez is red hot, carrying a 1.33 ERA in July and winning 10 straight decisions. He got two wins against the Orioles on June 12 and 17, allowing 6 runs in 5 IP in the first one and 2 runs (1 earned) in 6 IP in the second. The Jays scored 23 runs in those two games.

Toronto's offense has been hot in July (.785 OPS, 118 runs in 21 games), but a little cooler since the ASB (.708 OPS, 54 runs in 11 games). Their bullpen has been up and down depending on the pitcher. Brett Cecil and Jesse Chavez have been struggling but everyone else has been looking very good.

Bottom line -- this is an extremely dangerous series for the Orioles. Hopefully we can eke out a win or two, but it's going to be challenging.

Agree with excellent analysis, although I might have also included that the Orioles are technically 11-9 in the second half. Most people regard the AS break as the end of the first half and beginning of the second half, but of course game 81 represents the end of the first half. We were 47-34 at game 81 and now are 58-43, so we have gone 11-9 in the second half.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree with excellent analysis, although I might have also included that the Orioles are technically 11-9 in the second half. Most people regard the AS break as the end of the first half and beginning of the second half, but of course game 81 represents the end of the first half. We were 47-34 at game 81 and now are 58-43, so we have gone 11-9 in the second half.

Yes, 11-9 in the second half, but that started on July 4. We're actually 11-12 in July, rather than .500 as I thought when I made the OP. We need to win 2 of 3 in Toronto to have a .500 month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joey Bathroom can take a seat. The big jerk.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The guy they call Joey Bats homers and this game is going to be interesting. It is LOUD here. 2-1, Os.</p>— Brittany Ghiroli (@Britt_Ghiroli) <a href="

">July 29, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Gausman regroups with a scoreless second. Fanned Bautista with a 96 mph FB and Donaldson on the split.</p>— Steve Melewski (@masnSteve) <a href="

">July 29, 2016</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...