Jump to content

Dan Duquette: "...we've increased our payroll every single year that I've been here..."


AZRon

Recommended Posts

According to The Baseball Cube the 1993 Orioles payroll was $26M. That's the year Angelos bought the team. By the same source it reached $70M by 1998, almost tripling in five years. But then over the next 14 years the payroll never topped $81M (small discrepancy with the other sources here), actually declining in inflation-adjusted terms. Now in the last five years payroll has nearly doubled. It's a strange timeline, with many years of stagnation bookended by almost hyperinflationary periods.

It's an interesting difference between the two book-ends, too. The first was largely a product of adding free agents, while much of the 2nd was a product of arbitration and long-term contracts for a core of players that the O's either developed or acquired pre-arb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I know what I have seen so far.

I know they are not likely to grow a whole rotation.

I know they are not going to be fishing in deep waters for the big fish.

Would you be at all surprised to see Dan go down that road again?

My comment was an attempt to add some levity to the proceedings but at the same time, yes I expect it to happen if Dan thinks the 2018 can be competitive.

This is what I see in 2018.

Tilly,

Bundy

Gausman

Harvey

Maybe the 5th arm, comes from a variety of arms, already with the team?

So they don't have to grow a whole rotation. I think the rotation for 2018 is a glass half full.

IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I see in 2018.

Tilly,

Bundy

Gausman

Harvey

Maybe the 5th arm, comes from a variety of arms, already with the team?

So they don't have to grow a whole rotation. I think the rotation for 2018 is a glass half full.

IMO

You think the O's extend Tillman?

You think Harvey is going to be ready to be in the rotation in 2018? Harvey had TJ in July, he might not pitch at all next year and he's never pitched beyond A ball. I think Sedlock has a much better chance than Harvey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think the O's extend Tillman?

You think Harvey is going to be ready to be in the rotation in 2018? Harvey had TJ in July, he might not pitch at all next year and he's never pitched beyond A ball. I think Sedlock has a much better chance than Harvey.

Agreed. Harvey is not on the 40 man, so there's no reason to think he'll be in the rotation in 2018. Maybe 2019 with a full, healthy season under his belt in the minors in 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. Harvey is not on the 40 man, so there's no reason to think he'll be in the rotation in 2018. Maybe 2019 with a full, healthy season under his belt in the minors in 2018.

I think he will get promoted by the end of next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He had Tommy John surgery on July 26th 2016.

He's never pitched anywhere higher than Delmarva.

I hope they don't try and pitch him out of the MLB bullpen next season.

Will make their treatment of Bundy this year look like coddling in comparison.

Better than the Strasburg arc. I would think would look for some value while it is available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to The Baseball Cube the 1993 Orioles payroll was $26M. That's the year Angelos bought the team. By the same source it reached $70M by 1998, almost tripling in five years. But then over the next 14 years the payroll never topped $81M (small discrepancy with the other sources here), actually declining in inflation-adjusted terms. Now in the last five years payroll has nearly doubled. It's a strange timeline, with many years of stagnation bookended by almost hyperinflationary periods.

New owner euphoria and old/elderly/time running out on earth owner desperation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

New owner euphoria and old/elderly/time running out on earth owner desperation?

It might be instructive to see the Orioles' financial books over that whole period. The first part was the OPACY debut period where they were printing money, but that plateaued.

My question has always been why they kept spending on midrange payrolls through the 2000s. They certainly could have still won the same 65-70 games a year with payrolls 1/3rd the size.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • My guy, you are on record saying the season is over after losing Bradish.  If the O's lose this series, it sucks yeah, but it doesn't sink the season. I don't think it's a must win. Is it a must win for the Yankees? If they lose the series, they'll be like a game back of us. 
    • As of today, there are 5teams that i think are definite sellers...the Rockies, Marlins, A's, White Sox and Angels Best relievers amongst those teams: Andrew Nardi: ERA is over 5 but FIP is under 3.  His statcast numbers are solid.  His K rate is over 10 and his BB rate is 2.4.  He was good last year.  Lefty reliever Tanner Scott: We all know about Scott.  His ERA is under 2 now.  The K rate has jumped up to almost 10 but the walk rate is 6.5.  His statcast page is also excellent. Estevez:  LA closer.  Good K rate, great walk rate. xERA 2.66. Statcast page is good in some areas but he also allows a lot of hard hit balls. Luis Garcia:  Very good K rate, solid BB rate.  Statcast numbers aren't bad but like Estevez, he can give up some hard contract.  xERA is over 4 but FIP is 3.58, much better than his actual ERA.  Should see improvement. Kopech:  Has been a favorite of mine but admittingly its based off of what he did as a reliever in 2021 and the idea that getting him here will make a big impact. There isn't much to point to about him outside of his ability to get Ks and miss bats.  Everything else is below average to awful. This would need to be something that the Os see in him that they think they can fix.  He has some of he best stuff in the sport. Obviously we know about Mason Miller.  He is the best of the bunch but I wouldn't pay what it will likely cost to get him.  Erceg is hurt.   As I have talked about before, Nardi would be my target. I think hes the best of the bunch and being left handed is a bonus.  The 5+ ERA he has will hopefully allow the Os to get him cheaper too.    But I would target any of these guys and I believe we need at least 2 new relievers.
    • That's a good point.  However, a counter point could be made that when the Ravens moved to Baltimore a lot of the people were fans of other teams and the NFL combined with the Redskins did EVERYTHING that they could to make Baltimore an extension of the Washington franchise's fanbase. Yet the Ravens were able to overcome that and capture the hearts and minds of the market. They have had it now for almost a quarter century. My point is that in an age/era where fans/customers have more access to entertainment and information than EVER BEFORE, org behavior/excellence matters more than EVER BEFORE. The Phillies didn't always have the type of fanbase that they have now. The Padres didn't always draw the attendance figures that the are now. I would argue the Red Sox are going through the inverse now. They have fallen just a bit. But a few more years of being in mediocrity and they are going to go back to their early 2000's and 90's days. I could be as wrong as two left shoes, but I really feel that org behavior matters. Marketplace interest/engagement/momentum is not random and not solely population driven. STL Cards have a population smaller than ours and a comparable market size and they are always relevant in their market and always a top half payroll. Heck we were top 10 as late as 2017 under the awfulness of Angelos.
    • I think it’s a little more important than any other mid June series. Any series against a team you’re close to in the standings is important, but there’s a lot of games to play. 
    • Is it make or break? No. But is it important? Yes. Obviously, the team doesn't think it's any more important due to the pitching they've lined up for the series. I'll be happy if we win one and ecstatic if we win 2 or 3.
    • An agent should represent the best interests of his clients. The client and his family determine those best interests. I don't like Boras not because I feel he doesn't represent his clients well, but because I think an agent should basically be seen and not heard. In my opinion, Boras sets himself up as if he is a peer - near equal to those he represents. Semi Commissioner. How many other agents have a "press scum" at the winter meetings? Another case in point - this article. It's just Boras being Boras. The above feelings are mine and I don't repesent them as ones you should necessarily agree with so I will not argue their appropriateness. Just getting off my chest. To me Boras and Yankees are equals. Also, in my opinion, our players represented by Boras will extend if they deem the money fair and they see their future playing careers best served in Baltimore and not some bigger money, brighter lights city. I think the Orioles will spend but they will spend, as has been said, intelligently.  We shall see how it plays out. I do think our new ownership changes the potential calculus. So, I root today and don't get too hot and bothered about tomorrow. Just beat the Damn Yankees!
    • Fangraphs' Jon Becker mentions Carlos Estevez as a relief rental along with a few others we've already mentioned here about a zillion times. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/top-of-the-order-yankees-orioles-race-heats-up-as-deadline-looms/
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...