Jump to content

The O's turnaround starts tonight


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Hopefully.

The O's just completed a very tough part of their  schediule:

Astro away 44-20 .688,  O's went 0-3

Yankees home 37-23. .617,  O's went 2-1

Red Sox home 34-28 .548,  O's went 2-2

Pirates home 28-35 .444. O's went 2-0

Nationals away 38-24 .613, O's went 0-1

Yankees away 37-23 .619, O's went 0-3

O's went 6-10.  They are beat up.  Both in the pitching staff after facing some of the toughest offenses in baseball and in health. Thanks goodness for the Pirates.

But now:

White Sox 26-35 .426 away

Cardinals 29-33 .475 home

Indians 31-29.  517 are tough but the O's play at home

Rays 34-32 .515 away

BlueJays 31-32  .492 away 

Rays  34-32 home

That schedule looks a lot easier to me.   

I am calling for a turn around starting now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On paper this is an easier stretch of the schedule, and I think this may determine where we are heading. There are 27 games left until the All Star break and this ream needs to perform much better, especially against what may be a weaker part of the schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beating teams like this doesn't prove anything. I'm sure that management has to see that this team has no pitching. That is where the conversation for competing begins and ends. I'll stay tuned to every game, because that's what I like, but this team isn't on the same level as New York and Houston. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, maybenxtyr said:

Beating teams like this doesn't prove anything. I'm sure that management has to see that this team has no pitching. That is where the conversation for competing begins and ends. I'll stay tuned to every game, because that's what I like, but this team isn't on the same level as New York and Houston. 

 

It's good for them to beat the teams that they should beat.  I think a solid team like the O's should take 2/3 from the Sox.  We're god enough to do that, but we're not good enough to hang with Houston and NY.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

 

It's good for them to beat the teams that they should beat.  I think a solid team like the O's should take 2/3 from the Sox.  We're god enough to do that, but we're not good enough to hang with Houston and NY.

 

The good news is it's 4 against the White Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

A long week here and the negativity will really grow. If they are going to get going it better start soon.  

I'm a part of the negativity unfortunately. I've really enjoyed the run this team has been on, and I'm hoping it's not over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, maybenxtyr said:

I'm a part of the negativity unfortunately. I've really enjoyed the run this team has been on, and I'm hoping it's not over.

Trust me, you aren't the only one. I feel very similar to you. I was hoping to get two more playoff  runs out of this team. 

It is hard not to be negative or at least critical of things right now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, birdwatcher55 said:

Unless this pitching straightens out, I see nothing but a downward spiral.

Right.    The offense isn't exactly clicking on all cylinders, but the pitching isn't even giving us a chance right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • I miss the "Throwin' Swannanoan".......  
    • So what do the Rays do?   Spend a lot of money fixing the roof for the few remaining years that ballpark has left?   Or do like the A's and play in a minor league facility until their new ballpark is built? I wonder if they could work out something with the Yankees to play in Steinbrenner Field.   It is in Tampa and one of the nicer spring training facilities on the Gulf Coast.   The Rays train in Port Charlotte which is (50???) miles south and I don't think the facility is nearly as good.   Steinbrenner FIeld seats over 10K, has luxury boxes, and a very accessible location for Tampa area fans.  
    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...