Jump to content

What kind of season do you expect from Jonathan Schoop?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Jonathan Schoop had a breakout season last year, posting career highs in BA (.293), OBP (.338), SLG (.503), OPS (.841), HR (32) and RBI (105) and walks (35).    He was consistent for most of the season, but like practically everyone else on the team, had a miserable September (.590 OPS) that kept his final numbers from being even more spectacular.   

Schoop will play all of 2018 at age 26.   What do you think we see from him?    Does he maintain his 2017 level?     Does he take even another step forward?    Or does he regress?

I’m fairly optimistic.    I think the main reason Schoop progressed in 2017 was he cut back on swinging at bad pitches, lowering his O-Swing% from 43% in 2016 to 37.1% in 2017.    While that’s excellent improvement, he was better on that score in the first half than in the second half.   There’s two ways to look at that: (1) he’s at risk of falling back into his old bad habits, or (2) there’s room for even more improvement.   

Overall, I think Schoop is capable of equaling or exceeding his 2017 numbers.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Jonathan Schoop had a breakout season last year, posting career highs in BA (.293), OBP (.338), SLG (.503), OPS (.841), HR (32) and RBI (105) and walks (35).    He was consistent for most of the season, but like practically everyone else on the team, had a miserable September (.590 OPS) that kept his final numbers from being even more spectacular.   

Schoop will play all of 2018 at age 26.   What do you think we see from him?    Does he maintain his 2017 level?     Does he take even another step forward?    Or does he regress?

I’m fairly optimistic.    I think the main reason Schoop progressed in 2017 was he cut back on swinging at bad pitches, lowering his O-Swing% from 43% in 2016 to 37.1% in 2017.    While that’s excellent improvement, he was better on that score in the first half than in the second half.   There’s two ways to look at that: (1) he’s at risk of falling back into his old bad habits, or (2) there’s room for even more improvement.   

Overall, I think Schoop is capable of equaling or exceeding his 2017 numbers.    

I think he will be about the same as he was in 2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

I expect Schoop to be a Blessing in Disguise. ll ¬¬

 

Really, I expect Schoop to have  a few less home runs than last season (between 25 and 30) while maintaining (or slightly increasing) the respectable .338 OBP that he had.

 

Defensively I expect him to have an overall slight decrease in errors, as he was 2nd in the American League last year with 15 ........ although he also led the American League in Double Plays Turned (132), Putouts (329), Assists (446), and Range (4.87.) He was somewhat the opposite of Rich Dauer last year, who didn't cover a lot of ground, but rarely made errors on the balls that he got to.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

I expect Schoop to be a Blessing in Disguise. ll ¬¬

 

Really, I expect Schoop to have  a few less home runs than last season (between 25 and 30) while maintaining (or slightly increasing) the respectable .338 OBP that he had.

 

Defensively I expect him to have an overall slight decrease in errors, as he was 2nd in the American League last year with 15 ........ although he also led the American League in Double Plays Turned (132), Putouts (329), Assists (446), and Range (4.87.) He was somewhat the opposite of Rich Dauer last year, who didn't cover a lot of ground, but rarely made an error on the balls that he got to.

 

I don’t think Schoop covered as much ground as his “range factor” implies.    Don’t forget we had 4 of 5 RH rotation, which leads to seeing more LH hitters, hence more balls hit to the RH side of the field.    And, we have a low K pitching staff, so more balls in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am hoping for more of the same. His season last year was best case scenario for me and hopefully he can stretch that over a few seasons. He seems to keep getting better every year though so maybe next year he will be in the MVP talks :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

I expect Schoop to be a Blessing in Disguise. ll ¬¬

 

Really, I expect Schoop to have  a few less home runs than last season (between 25 and 30) while maintaining (or slightly increasing) the respectable .338 OBP that he had.

 

Defensively I expect him to have an overall slight decrease in errors, as he was 2nd in the American League last year with 15 ........ although he also led the American League in Double Plays Turned (132), Putouts (329), Assists (446), and Range (4.87.) He was somewhat the opposite of Rich Dauer last year, who didn't cover a lot of ground, but rarely made errors on the balls that he got to.

 

 

 

7 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

I dont think that Schoop covered as much ground as his Range Factor implies. Don’t forget we had 4 of 5 right-handed pitchers in the starting rotation, which leads to seeing more left-handed hitters, hence more balls hit to the right side of the field. And, we have a low K pitching staff, so more balls in play.

 

o

 

OK thanks, Frank.

I thought that he covered a pretty good amount of ground from my eye test (I watched about 140-145 Orioles games last season), but the factors that you pointed out should be taken into consideration also.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Hard to win an MVP on a last place team.

Hard, yes, but not impossible.  :)

Ernie Banks won the 1958 NL MVP playing for the 72-82 Cubs.  And again in 1959 for the 74-80 Cubs.  Let's play two!

Steve Carlton won the 1972 NL Cy Young Award playing for the 59-97 Phillies.  Only 32 games were won by a Phillies pitcher other than Carlton that year.

Paul Hornung won the 1956 Heisman Trophy playing for the 2-8 Notre Dame Fighting Irish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...