Jump to content

NEED one of the Big Three Pitchers Left


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

So it’s looking like the competition is between these teams,

Phillies

Brewers

Cardinals

Nationals

Angels

Mariners

Opening Day is 3-4 weeks away. I guess they are waiting for an injury to make a team desperate. We’re competing against a bunch of NL teams and teams in the AL that play a lot in big ballparks. 

Phillies - could sign one or more

Brewers - still in

Cardinals - Probably have 5 starters better than Cobb and Lynn and I doubt they send the money or Arrieta.

Nationals - Luxury tax is a problem, Some reports of interest in Arrieta

Angels -  

 @JeffFletcherOCR
 
Wondering if the #Angels are involved with any remaining free agents? GM Billy Eppler, this morning: "We feel very good about the group we have here. We are not looking to pursue anything. We are open minded to things that come around."
10:16 AM - 28 Feb 2018
 
  •  

Mariners- I have not heard anything lately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 351
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Bob Nightengale from USA Today on the Fan just now said he expected Cobb and Lynn to end up with the Brewers and Twins and Arietta with the Nationals.  Just passing along....doubt anyone really knows for sure right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, atomic said:

  Really I am tired of waiting for these guys to sign.  

Maybe in the next collective bargaining agreement they should have some free agent deadline where you can't sign free agents between March 1st and May 1st.  

No offense, and I understand where you're coming from, but I doubt if the players, their agents, or the teams care whether we fans get tired of waiting or not.  Neither side would push to put such a deadline into the next CBA unless they felt they would realize a benefit from doing so, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, gtman55 said:

If the Orioles are actually in win it now mode shouldn't they have signed one of these three guys already? I don't think their current rotation gets them to the post season. I could be wrong though. xD

If these three pitchers are in win now mode, is it likely that they would sign with the Orioles unless the O's offered a lot more than anyone else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

If these three pitchers are in win now mode, is it likely that they would sign with the Orioles unless the O's offered a lot more than anyone else?

I am sure all 3 pitchers are concerned with money first and foremost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

If these three pitchers are in win now mode, is it likely that they would sign with the Orioles unless the O's offered a lot more than anyone else?

At this point, their market has dropped so much they just want the most money. Regardless where that's at. All reports I've heard is that the Twins and Brewers are content now as are the Angels. The Nats don't have a huge need to add another SP, so they may rather save their resources for next year.

The Mariners may be in play for Cobb or Lynn. I still think Arrieta ends up in Philly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be surprised if the Orioles competed for a wild card spot. I have a feeling that Machado is going to have a really big year to position himself for next year's free agency. And our starting pitching will almost certainly be better, even if we don't add one of the three remaining starters. If you get any kind of bounceback season from Davis or Trumbo, you would almost certainly have a better offense than last year's. 

Lynn would be a nice addition, though. The rotation gets awful thin if one of the top four gets injured or is bad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are some projections from you all for what these guys are going to get at this point? I'm not worried about with who, just strictly number curiosity. Arrieta, Lynn, and Cobb. I know no one knows for sure. I'll play since I'm asking.

Arrieta - 5/110

Lynn & Cobb - 4/68

You guys know a lot more than I do and keep up with it more, I'm interested to hear some number projections. I'm sure there are a lot of guesses through out this thread and others but I wasn't going to sift through them right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, scbalt52 said:

What are some projections from you all for what these guys are going to get at this point? I'm not worried about with who, just strictly number curiosity. Arrieta, Lynn, and Cobb. I know no one knows for sure. I'll play since I'm asking.

Arrieta - 5/110

Lynn & Cobb - 4/68

You guys know a lot more than I do and keep up with it more, I'm interested to hear some number projections. I'm sure there are a lot of guesses through out this thread and others but I wasn't going to sift through them right now. 

Arrieta's market and value are hard to predict.  He may take a 1 year deal in the $25M range, though 5 years $110M could be realistic from the Nats or Phillies.

I would be shocked if Lynn or Cobb get 4 years 68.  I think both will eventually settle in the 3 years, 42-48 range.

Just my two cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yardball85 said:

Arrieta's market and value are hard to predict.  He may take a 1 year deal in the $25M range, though 5 years $110M could be realistic from the Nats or Phillies.

I would be shocked if Lynn or Cobb get 4 years 68.  I think both will eventually settle in the 3 years, 42-48 range.

Just my two cents.

I agree with this. I think if Cobb could go back and take the 3/$42M or whatever it was from the Cubs, he would. He'll probably end up around there (or maybe higher), but I think he'd prefer to play for Maddon and the Cubs given the money will be around there anyway. I think Cobb and Lynn could both end up with vesting options based on innings or starts, but I do think 3 at around $15M AAV is where they each end up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So there's three things I'm fairly sure of right now

1) We are about $30 million or so below last year's payroll

2) Our FO wants to avoid financial commitments past this year

3) Our FO wants to try to "contend" in 2018 (if they didn't, they'd have traded Machado).  

Given all these three things, why not offer one of the Big Three a huge one year deal.  Like 1 year for $25-30 million.  That way we are still only matching last season's payroll, we aren't adding financial commitments past 2018, and it gives us a decent shot at a playoff spot.  And the free agent pitcher gets to save some face because they're getting paid a lot more than the QO, and can hit the market next offseason when all the rich teams go over the luxury tax.  Everybody wins.  

It just makes too much sense, and I guess our FO doesn't like to do things that make sense.  Like signing Dyson -- a guy who provided speed and elite OF defense, two of the teams biggest non-pitching needs -- for a super cheap 2 year deal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, FanSince88 said:

So there's three things I'm fairly sure of right now

1) We are about $30 million or so below last year's payroll

2) Our FO wants to avoid financial commitments past this year

3) Our FO wants to try to "contend" in 2018 (if they didn't, they'd have traded Machado).  

Given all these three things, why not offer one of the Big Three a huge one year deal.  Like 1 year for $25-30 million.  That way we are still only matching last season's payroll, we aren't adding financial commitments past 2018, and it gives us a decent shot at a playoff spot.  And the free agent pitcher gets to save some face because they're getting paid a lot more than the QO, and can hit the market next offseason when all the rich teams go over the luxury tax.  Everybody wins.  

It just makes too much sense, and I guess our FO doesn't like to do things that make sense.  Like signing Dyson -- a guy who provided speed and elite OF defense, two of the teams biggest non-pitching needs -- for a super cheap 2 year deal.  

I have thought about this several times. Here is the issue, I think. If this is were most other teams it would probably work, but if you were one of those pitchers, would you want to "re-establish" yourself in the AL East?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/5/2018 at 12:01 PM, murph said:

Bob Nightengale from USA Today on the Fan just now said he expected Cobb and Lynn to end up with the Brewers and Twins and Arietta with the Nationals.  Just passing along....doubt anyone really knows for sure right now. 

I think that's probably how it shakes out. Cobb has to be kicking himself for not taking that Cubs deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...