Jump to content

Could the Orioles Move Out of Baltimore in 2024?


oriolesfan97

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Chromehill said:

Where exactly are those greener pastures?  Every city under consideration for expansion has issues, else a MLB team would already be there.  Tampa and Oakland, until they get their stadium issues resolved will get first choice of moving to a new location.

The biggest issue the Orioles have attendance wise is the owner, people are tired of the dysfunctional management of the team and lack of a plan being communicated to the fan base.

No, the crazy dedicated Orioles Hangout fan is upset with dysfunction and not hearing about a plan. The average fan would show up if the Orioles fielded a consistent winner. It's not rocket science. Win and people will come.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 166
  • Created
  • Last Reply
16 minutes ago, ORIOLE33 said:

Why is baseball so big on expansion when attendance is down?

The league has been setting new revenue records every year without fail. You don't necessarily require attendance to make money.

I think they also believe that having more teams in more markets will help them kick-start greater fan interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Im watching the rec league baseball teams, barely have enough players, and 2/3 less than what it was when my son played.

Before you say old neighborhood, the boys are just choosing other sports, like soccer is busting at the seams. From what I have heard, at least in Maryland, most rec leagues are seeing the same results.

 

Opportunity has hurt baseball at a youth level, as you noted. There are simply more options.

The last decade has also seen an enormous rise in kids settling on one sport and playing it exclusively - which has reduced overall participation and essentially killed traditional rec leagues in more areas. See travel ball, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, FlipTheBird said:

Opportunity has hurt baseball at a youth level, as you noted. There are simply more options.

The last decade has also seen an enormous rise in kids settling on one sport and playing it exclusively - which has reduced overall participation and essentially killed traditional rec leagues in more areas. See travel ball, etc.

The trend to provide new fancy uniforms for every player for every sport,  along with needing to pay umps/refs, as well as field fees, as made some families tell their kids, 1 sport per year, has to have impact too. So by the time you pay over $100 per child for the sport to participate, and then fork over the over money needed, cleats, socks, shin guards, etc, it adds up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FlipTheBird said:

Opportunity has hurt baseball at a youth level, as you noted. There are simply more options.

The last decade has also seen an enormous rise in kids settling on one sport and playing it exclusively - which has reduced overall participation and essentially killed traditional rec leagues in more areas. See travel ball, etc.

In my neck of the woods, the number of baseball participants is rising, especially at the T-Ball level. That said, the number of players declines at each age level. My kids' league had 9 T-Ball teams last year but just 3 teams at the 13-15 age level. 

I don't think it's that baseball is boring in general. But if you aren't any good, it can be VERY boring. Who wants to strike out three times and play RF two nights a week? Baseball is heartless. If you stink, it's painfully obvious that you stink. When kids realize that they stink, they quit.

If you stink at field sports like soccer, football or lacrosse, it's not as evident. It's easier to hide weak players and the kids don't get as discouraged/embarrassed as quickly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 7/2/2018 at 2:15 PM, Why Not? said:

In my neck of the woods, the number of baseball participants is rising, especially at the T-Ball level. That said, the number of players declines at each age level. My kids' league had 9 T-Ball teams last year but just 3 teams at the 13-15 age level. 

I don't think it's that baseball is boring in general. But if you aren't any good, it can be VERY boring. Who wants to strike out three times and play RF two nights a week? Baseball is heartless. If you stink, it's painfully obvious that you stink. When kids realize that they stink, they quit.

If you stink at field sports like soccer, football or lacrosse, it's not as evident. It's easier to hide weak players and the kids don't get as discouraged/embarrassed as quickly

Soccer is more fun to play than baseball. 

  Even if you are great at baseball and play shortstop most of the time you are just sitting or standing around.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weams said:

Disagree with you. Totally. 

You are disagree that a shortstop in baseball is mostly standing or sitting around?  They didn't have soccer leagues when I was growing up.  But I had soccer class and intramural. leagues in college where I played midfielder and you are constantly running.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, atomic said:

You are disagree that a shortstop in baseball is mostly standing or sitting around?  They didn't have soccer leagues when I was growing up.  But I had soccer class and intramural. leagues in college where I played midfielder and you are constantly running.

Playing baseball is much more fun than running around. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, atomic said:

You are disagree that a shortstop in baseball is mostly standing or sitting around?  They didn't have soccer leagues when I was growing up.  But I had soccer class and intramural. leagues in college where I played midfielder and you are constantly running.

I never had less fun playing a sport as I did playing soccer against a bunch of middle age Germans that totally outclassed me in skill.

I'd have more fun facing major league pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, atomic said:

You are disagree that a shortstop in baseball is mostly standing or sitting around?  They didn't have soccer leagues when I was growing up.  But I had soccer class and intramural. leagues in college where I played midfielder and you are constantly running.

If I want to run, I run.

You can just do the running part and leave out the ball and the teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

If I want to run, I run.

You can just do the running part and leave out the ball and the teams.

I find running for running boring. Soccer and racquetball, basketball are fun and are high cardio.  Kids don't like just standing around.  I quit baseball at 13 because I was bored standing around in centerfield. It was the only option for spring sport at the time.  Maybe if I was better I would have liked it better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Weird, it's amazing how easy NFL kickers can kick 50+ yard FGs just when Tucker no longer can effectively.
    • Agree with that, but last I checked so do we. Also Detroit has been doing their late season run with guys named other than Skubal. That said lets go.
    • Hamilton needs to really improve on coverage of TEs.
    • Some quick recaps of the matchups against KC, as they happened so long ago that they’re genuinely tough to remember. Game 1 (@BAL): Orioles win 6-4.  Dean Kremer vs. Michael (Wacha) Wacha. Kremer escapes a brutal 1st inning with two errors (Urias; Henderson). After that, the pitchers mostly cruise until T3, when Kremer gives up a bomb to Witt, followed by a walk and a Perez bomb for a 3-0 KC lead. The O’s bats storm back, matching those 3 runs in B4, with Rutschman double and a Mountcastle HR providing the highlights. Not much action until T8, when Cano gets into and works out of a huge jam (2nd and 3rd, none out) to preserve the tie. In B8, three singles culminate in a Mountcastle RBI to take the lead. Kimbrel promptly blows said lead in T9, giving up a single to Isbel and two mostly uncontested SBs to PR Blanco, who trots home on a sac fly. In B9, Mullins singles with one out against RP Nick Anderson and Westburg sends the fans home happy with an opposite field walk-off blast.  Game 2 (@BAL): Royals win 4-1 Cole Irvin vs. Alec Marsh. Much less intrigue in this one. Irvin didn’t have it, giving up four, that could have been more. Garcia did most of the damage, with a double and triple that brought home 3 runs. Marsh mostly stymied the O’s bats, with Cowser’s double in B3 providing the only run. Smith closed it out for KC. Game 3 (@ BAL): Orioles win 4-3 Corbin Burnes vs. Cole Ragans. This one looked like it was headed the way of the visitors, as Ragans dominated through 6.1 innings of one-hit ball. The Royals had a load of traffic against Burnes, with 9 hits and a couple walks. The O’s did well to minimize the damage. Perez provided two RBI singles against Burnes, but his ponderous baserunning also kept him from scoring both times. KC added a 3rd run against Baumann in T7, on a homer by Garcia. Once Ragans finally exited, the O’s came alive, with RP James McArthur yielding two runs in B8. Cowser singled and was followed by a double from McCann. They each came home, on a Firestone by Henderson and a clutch 2-out single by Rutschman, to bring the score to 3-2. Smith again came on to close it out for KC, and he was greeted rudely. The bases were loaded for Cowser, who struck out. He was followed by McCann, however, who delivered the walk-off two-run single. Great rejoicing. Game 4 (@ KC): Royals win 9-4 Dean Kremer vs. Alec Marsh. Both guys largely matched what they’d done a couple weeks earlier. Kremer pitched into the 6th, with the only blemish until that point being a B4 solo shot by Pasquantino. Marsh pitched out of a couple jams, first picking off Henderson at 3B to snuff out a T1 2nd/3rd threat, then getting a popup from Mullins and a groundout from Cowser to escape a T4 bases loaded conundrum. B6 was a nightmare for the O’s, with Kremer getting two outs but also issuing two BBs. Akin was called on, and promptly set the whole thing ablaze, giving up RBI hits to Melendez, Massey, and Renfroe to make it 6-0. In T7, Rutschman answered with a grand slam off of possible double agent Smith to draw closer. But in B7, Melendez hit a 3-run bomb off of Tate to provide the final margin. Game 5 (@ KC): Orioles win 9-7 Corbin Burnes vs. Cole Ragans. As expected, a pitcher’s duel. Ragans came out hot, striking out the side in T1. His luck turned, though, in T2. The Orioles BABIP’d him to death, recording 8 hits in the frame. A two-run single by Westburg made it 7-0 and sent Ragans to the showers. Burnes was solid, though unspectacular, until yielding a B6 Weaver to Perez that ended his night. After the O’s manufactured a run in T7, an uncharacteristically wild outing from Coulombe was followed by a characteristically wild outing from Yohan Ramirez, with yet another big hit from Perez providing 2 RBIs to close to 8-7. Kauffman was in a frenzy. In T8, though, Mountcastle and Santander slammed back-to-back doubles off RP John Schreiber to make it 9-7. Akin and Baumann survived the bottom of the order in B8, and Kimbrel closed it out in orderly fashion in T9. Game 6 (@ KC): Orioles win 5-0  Cole Irvin vs. Seth Lugo. A mismatch on paper, and indeed it proved to be. Irvin survived B1 turmoil and then absolutely locked things down. Lugo was ambushed with back-to-back blasts from Westburg and Cowser to start T3, and then pitched his way into trouble in T6. A triple (?) by Santander was followed by a Mountcastle RBI double. Eventually RP Angel Zerpa walked in another run, but he did dodge further damage by striking out both Holliday and Henderson with the bases still loaded. Urias provided the final blow with a T9 single that drove home Henderson, and the Orioles bullpen locked down the shutout.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...