Jump to content

Orioles to be more active in International Free Agent Market


NCRaven

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

At some point, you offer your max amount, put a 24 h limit on it and they either take it or just publically announce you are done and stop this letting them use us as the village idiots for leverage with tne team that they clearly want to sign with.  

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 631
  • Created
  • Last Reply
10 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

At some point, you offer your max amount, put a 24 h limit on it and they either take it or just publically announce you are done and stop this letting them use us as the village idiots for leverage with tne team that they clearly want to sign with.  

Why? There's no deadline. If the Orioles have a strong idea of what each prospect is worth, then there's no point in ending the negotiation on an arbitrary deadline. I think things are moving along...the Marlins are making trades pretty fast. They can only get a fixed amount more cash. The process will end when the Marlins reach their end and then the two teams divvy up the players with the money available. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Could and should.  Make him say no to the entire allotment. 

At this point, the Orioles haven't misplayed this. Unlike the Marlins they haven't traded away 17, 19, and 22 year old talents, or a solid arbitration controlled relief pitcher. They did get less for Gausman, but it is unclear exactly how much less, partly because they dumped a chunk of salary as well. They have the chits to dare one of these dudes to take significantly less money to not sign with them. Because of the hard cap,  the money by itself is relatively inconsequential even to a team like the Orioles. So compared to the Marlins we are playing with way more of the house's  money at the moment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Chavez Ravine said:

At this point, the Orioles haven't misplayed this. Unlike the Marlins they haven't traded away 17, 19, and 22 year old talents, or a solid arbitration controlled relief pitcher. They did get less for Gausman, but it is unclear exactly how much less, partly because they dumped a chunk of salary as well. They have the chits to dare one of these dudes to take significantly less money to not sign with them. Because of the hard cap,  the money by itself is relatively inconsequential even to a team like the Orioles. So compared to the Marlins we are playing with way more of the house's  money at the moment.

How is sending the Phillies 750K for Jack not a misplay?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Chavez Ravine said:

At this point, the Orioles haven't misplayed this. Unlike the Marlins they haven't traded away 17, 19, and 22 year old talents, or a solid arbitration controlled relief pitcher. They did get less for Gausman, but it is unclear exactly how much less, partly because they dumped a chunk of salary as well. They have the chits to dare one of these dudes to take significantly less money to not sign with them. Because of the hard cap,  the money by itself is relatively inconsequential even to a team like the Orioles. So compared to the Marlins we are playing with way more of the house's  money at the moment.

Perhaps, but that doesn't address my point that the Orioles should offer VVM the entire amount (or less if he wants some of it to go to his brother) and see what happens.  And like you said, I think they do have something to lose since the stupid Gausman trade was, to many of us, only somewhat forgivable because of the slot $$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ohfan67 said:

Why? There's no deadline. If the Orioles have a strong idea of what each prospect is worth, then there's no point in ending the negotiation on an arbitrary deadline. I think things are moving along...the Marlins are making trades pretty fast. They can only get a fixed amount more cash. The process will end when the Marlins reach their end and then the two teams divvy up the players with the money available. 

How much more cash can the Marlins get?  Why not strategically pressure their agents to risk losing a bunch of money by not signing with us?  Instead we just let the Marlins continue to accumulate the necessary dollars, and now they get the players probably.  If instead we had told the agents this was our max, here is what we were offering  back before the Marlins started accumulating these extra dollars by trade, maybe we could have overwhelmed the Marlins offer early on and then maybe they would have signed rather than risk getting a lot less if we had backed away weeks ago.  Because if we had pulled out then,  they certainly were going to get a lot less from the Marlins at that point than they are now.   Either way, we are the most inept deal making organization in baseball.  We bid against ourselves, seldom do anything strategic, just plod along and wait till it all plays out. 

Or maybe I have just lost patience with the whole situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Yardball85 said:

Perhaps, but that doesn't address my point that the Orioles should offer VVM the entire amount (or less if he wants some of it to go to his brother) and see what happens.  And like you said, I think they do have something to lose since the stupid Gausman trade was, to many of us, only somewhat forgivable because of the slot $$.

I certainly think they could offer one of them all or most of it. That works against the Marlins going for the trifecta.....or even just the Mesa double.  Who knows, but I sort of think the assumption that the Mesas would go as a package deal is old history. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

How much more cash can the Marlins get?  Why not strategically pressure their agents to risk losing a bunch of money by not signing with us?  Instead we just let the Marlins continue to accumulate the necessary dollars, and now they get the players probably.  If instead we had told the agents this was our max, here is what we were offering  back before the Marlins started accumulating these extra dollars by trade, maybe we could have overwhelmed the Marlins offer early on and then maybe they would have signed rather than risk getting a lot less if we had backed away weeks ago.  Because if we had pulled out then,  they certainly were going to get a lot less from the Marlins at that point than they are now.   Either way, we are the most inept deal making organization in baseball.  We bid against ourselves, seldom do anything strategic, just plod along and wait till it all plays out. 

Or maybe I have just lost patience with the whole situation. 

They could be the Mets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, weams said:

The Gausman trade saved a great amount of money. Not as much as the Marlins Yelich trade though. 

I’d say the Brewers will be happy to pay Yelich 5/$58.25 mm for 2018-22.   Per Fangraphs he was worth $60.9 mm this season, and look where the Brewers are thanks largely to him.    I do not expect the Braves to get that out of Gausman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Chavez Ravine said:

I certainly think they could offer one of them all or most of it. That works against the Marlins going for the trifecta.....or even just the Mesa double.  Who knows, but I sort of think the assumption that the Mesas would go as a package deal is old history. 

Fair enough.  I may still be operating under the package deal assumption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

How much more cash can the Marlins get?  Why not strategically pressure their agents to risk losing a bunch of money by not signing with us?  Instead we just let the Marlins continue to accumulate the necessary dollars, and now they get the players probably.  If instead we had told the agents this was our max, here is what we were offering  back before the Marlins started accumulating these extra dollars by trade, maybe we could have overwhelmed the Marlins offer early on and then maybe they would have signed rather than risk getting a lot less if we had backed away weeks ago.  Because if we had pulled out then,  they certainly were going to get a lot less from the Marlins at that point than they are now.   Either way, we are the most inept deal making organization in baseball.  We bid against ourselves, seldom do anything strategic, just plod along and wait till it all plays out. 

Or maybe I have just lost patience with the whole situation. 

Both! ?? Orioles fans have every right to be frustrated. I am and lose my mind about some things. I’m happy, however, that the Angelos boys and whomever they hire are likely to take the international market seriously, etc., so I have a little hope. I am not emotionally attached to these prospects because the Orioles jumped in the game so late, the players seem good but not great, etc. I have low expectations, but now have a little hope for the future. This negotiation is really from the past administration and is being conducted while they are searching for new leadership. I’ll be pleasantly surprised if something happens, but if not it’s definitely on the old guard. But I do feel your pain on most issues. I’m just chill on these prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SteveA said:

As others have said, DD might have thought they had enough to get the Mesa's without it.

Also, the deal happened right about the time that it was determined that Trumbo was choosing surgery and out for the year.   Is it POSSIBLE that we had a deal lined up where we were going to toss in some international$ with Trumbo to unload his contract on someone?   But his decision to have surgery nixed that possibility?

Just putting it out there, the timing works out.   Trumbo didn't announce his decision to have surgery until a day or two after the Zoellner deal, but he could have told the Orioles, or it could have become obvious to the Orioles' doctors, that he was going to have the surgery.

No one was trading for Trumbo.  More likely when Adam wasnt traded the internal budget to sign Mesa was cut.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Elias would have to win three different bids against 29 other, how does he like to say it, "tough competitors" to get this done. It would be a pony, but I don't think we're getting a pony. A lot of O'Neill talk, but Walltimore I think Elias would have to give him a very nice contract.    As a free agent, he is Santander adjacent and if his market is so soft he needs another prove it situation, not even an assured full time job in OPACY probably would be near the bottom of the list.
    • Pivetta in 14 career starts against the Os has a 3.19 ERA and 79 IP. So basically, he averages 5 2/3 against us giving up 2 runs per start.  Feels like we always have a hard time with him, so I would definitely be in favor of that signing if anything so we don't have to face him anymore.  The last time I saw Tyler O'Neill, he was sending us home with a monstrous home run.  Good player and definitely one I would like.  I like Carson Kelly, but he doesn't have any postseason experience and O'Neill doesn't have much either....so I would like to add at least one good bat who has won some games in October before.  Hoffman was so bad in the playoffs this year that I am hesitant to add another Phillies pitcher that just spent his time in the postseason getting rocked. I am fine with trading Mounty, as I don't enjoy watching him hit anymore.   
    • I'm not sure Kelly has a ton of value. His defensive metrics are declining. His ZIPs projections for 2025 is 301 PA, .226/.306/.365 for 8 HR and 13 2Bs. Why not just keep McCann? Tyler O'Neill I can get behind. That would be a solid pickup. I would hope they can do better than Pivetta. I agree with you that Snell makes much more sense if you want to win. With Jeff Hoffman, are you paying for the last two years in Philly? Because before that he was not good. With relievers being as volatile as they are, what's the contract look like. I'd be worried about paying for 2023-2024 level performance and getting the pitcher you saw in Cincinnati in 2021-2022.   So give me McCann, O'Neill and Snell. Do what the O's do and find a cheap and effective BP arm or two off the scrap heap.  I'd be good.
    • This wouldn’t be an Angelos offseason as it would be multiple multi year commitments where the players are making 8 figures. And yes, Elias isn’t a GM likely to go nuts in FA because he knows it’s largely foolish to do so.
    • That offseason would stink, to be quite honest. And Rubenstein should be rightfully criticized if that's all it was. The O's roster would be an 84-85 win club if that's all they did.  Jeff Hoffman would be a great pickup. Nick Pivetta is a middle/back of the rotation guy and would be a big step back from Burnes.  Carson Kelly is a backup C and a lateral move to McCann. Tyler O'Neill would be a fine replacement for Santander.  They need more. A Eflin, Grayson, Pivetta, Kremer, Povich/Suarez/Rogers/McDermott rotation just isn't good enough. That's also not enough depth. You simply can't count on Rogers and his 88-89 mph fastball, nor can you count on Suarez to repeat (although he'd be a fine bullpen/depth arm as a starter).  This bullpen, even adding Hoffman, is still a liability waiting to happen.  This club needs 2 bullpen arms, 2 starters, a backup C, and at least 1 OF/DH type as well as some sort of investment in the young core by way of contract extensions. I'm sick of hearing "well it takes 2 to tango". That's balderdash. If the Royals can do it, the O's can do it. 
    • Unless there are extensions this would not be a good offseason for new ownership. Just screams Angelos approach, IMO which means Elias is more than problem. Take risks for once 
    • The Marlins lost Alcantara, Perez for the entire season, Luzardo/Garrett/Cabrera had multiple injuries. It's easy to believe things are coincidental but when you look at what so many of their key players were going through and how others had to step up, it makes a lot more sense. Most of them are also young, too.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...