Jump to content

Where would Richie Martin fit on the O's top 30?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply
22 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Martin is the A's #12 prospect.   You can read about him here:   http://m.mlb.com/prospects/2018?list=oak

I have Martin at #7 on the my O's top 30 prospect list.   How could Elias not select him if he falls in the O's Top 10?

Because there’s someone he likes better?   Because his opinion of Martin isn’t as high as yours?

All will be revealed next Thursday.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Because there’s someone he likes better?   Because his opinion of Martin isn’t as high as yours?

All will be revealed next Thursday.  

You didn't answer the title question.  Where would you place Martin in the O's top 30?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, wildcard said:

You didn't answer the title question.  Where would you place Martin in the O's top 30?

First of all, let me say that I don’t consider my opinions on minor leaguers to be very well educated. My opinions come from looking at stats, age compared to level, and then reading opinions about the player’s defense and room for development.   

With all that said, I’d probably have Martin in the 12-15 range.    He never hit before this year, people like Luke don’t think he’ll be much of an offensive threat based on watching him, and he’s not particularly young in AA at 23.   It seems like he’d be very solid defensively.   

I’m not necessarily against picking the guy, since improving the defense at SS is a priority.   But I can’t say if he’s the best Rule 5 guy out there.    It’s Elias’ job to figure that out, not people like me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Frobby said:

First of all, let me say that I don’t consider my opinions on minor leaguers to be very well educated. My opinions come from looking at stats, age compared to level, and then reading opinions about the player’s defense and room for development.   

With all that said, I’d probably have Martin in the 12-15 range.    He never hit before this year, people like Luke don’t think he’ll be much of an offensive threat based on watching him, and he’s not particularly young in AA at 23.   It seems like he’d be very solid defensively.   

I’m not necessarily against picking the guy, since improving the defense at SS is a priority.   But I can’t say if he’s the best Rule 5 guy out there.    It’s Elias’ job to figure that out, not people like me.

I assume that Luke and Tony would have him in our 20s. I’d love to hear. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weams said:

I assume that Luke and Tony would have him in our 20s. I’d love to hear. 

Luke already said he wouldn’t put Martin in his top 5 of players eligible for the Rule 5 draft.   Not sure what that means in terms of where he’d rank on our prospects list.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Martin seems like an interesting pick for a team like the Orioles who has a need at SS. I've never seen him play, but if he really is a defense first SS, he would be an easier fit on a team that could use a good young defensive SS. Makes me wonder though, why would the A's not protect him but protect a guy like outfielder Sky Bolt (#30 Pipeline)?

Just looking at the stats and pedigree, I'm missing something here on either Martin or Bolt. Unless there is some hole to Martin's game that the Orioles don't think he can overcome (could be the bat still since he had a high BABIP and was in the Texas League), he seems like an easy rule 5 pick that should be able to make the club as the everyday SS or at least utility guy. 

His bat will probably be a negative next year, but if his defense is as good as advertised by several sources, then I think the O's nab him with the first overall pick. Will definitely be interesting to see who Elias picks though.

Oh, and I'd probably have Martin as #16 on our list unless I was convinced his bat will eventually play better. I haven't done a ton of homework on him so I would say it would be a preliminary ranking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Martin seems like an interesting pick for a team like the Orioles who has a need at SS. I've never seen him play, but if he really is a defense first SS, he would be an easier fit on a team that could use a good young defensive SS. Makes me wonder though, why would the A's not protect him but protect a guy like outfielder Sky Bolt (#30 MLB Pipeline)?

Why?   Because his name is Sky Bolt!    How can you not keep a guy with that name?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Updated as May 6th.. Big drop for Baumler due to velocity drop and lack of pitches thrown per start. A few new names break into top 30 and with the FCL playing one game, Almeyda and Wager (rehab) pop onto the list now that they've played. Liranzo should show up next week.
    • Irvin will be the one to go to the pen. You also wonder if the Os look to trade a trade a starter, especially if Povich and maybe McDermott show they can come up and help if needs be.  I tend to doubt the Os go this route but I wouldn’t completely dismiss it. They have to figure out some way to get in a real back end reliever to go with Kimbrel, Cano and DC.  They aren’t going to trade Mayo or Basallo and may not move Kjerstad for one either. So, that leaves a lot of other good prospects or taking from the Ml roster.  All of it makes sense on different levels.
    • Yea but for a piece that helps now.  I don’t think I trade him for a prospect package unless it’s some kind of high end pitching prospect that should be ML ready at some point this year or especially next year. That said, I don’t think that pitcher will be available for Santander, so getting something that helps now for him is something we absolutely should be looking to do. I would rather see Hays get back here, show he’s healthy and start performing and then move him though.  Santander has some leadership stuff you like.  
    • His statcast numbers are trending well. Only thing that’s surprising so far is that he’s not walking a lot.  
    • That new routine includes getting himself warmed up differently and more quickly than as as a starter. These nuances are why no one can assume a starter can just become a great reliever and automatically get a bump in velocity.  We also don't know how quickly he can rebound to be able to pitch again. Now, he hadn't pitched in a week yesterday so he should been fresh, so perhaps the new warmup routine did not see him fully warmed up. Or maybe a lack of adrenaline pitching late in a 6-0 game was why we saw about a MPH difference in his velocities? Suarez didn't miss many bats and actually missed none with his fastball. His fastball has typically gotten a lot of whiff.  The good news is he didn't allow any hits or walks, and needed only 24 pitches to get through 2.1 innings.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...