Jump to content

Hyde's Decisions 2019


Aristotelian

Recommended Posts

Just now, Oriole4Life said:

My only issue is that a no-hitter is special and Hyde should have given Hess the opportunity to decide himself if he wanted to go for it. At least consult him in the dugout before the inning started.

I understand that Hess pitched on Thursday and it is the beginning of the season and all that. I was pretty upset when it happened but now I've calmed down and understand Hyde's reasoning. I still think he should've let Hess go for it.

Thank you, and well said. Precisely.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Oriole4Life said:

My only issue is that a no-hitter is special and Hyde should have given Hess the opportunity to decide himself if he wanted to go for it. At least consult him in the dugout before the inning started.

I understand that Hess pitched on Thursday and it is the beginning of the season and all that. I was pretty upset when it happened but now I've calmed down and understand Hyde's reasoning. I still think he should've let Hess go for it.

Between Hess pitching last Thursday and it being the beginning of the season it was only a matter of when he got pulled.

This is handled much differently if it was June 1st, Hyde is healthy and he is on a normal 4 days rest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have any problem at all with Hess getting pulled. The pitch count was high given short rest and the early point in the season. There's no need to put the kid's arm at risk. And, he was no longer hitting his spots. No matter where Sucre was calling for the ball, it was ending up in the fat part of the plate. He was about to get lit up. This way he ends on a positive note.

My problem was brining in Araujo. I know he needed some work, and a 6 run lead is about the only place you want him. But given that the team no hitter was within reach, I would have liked to see Wright in first. See if you can take the no hitter another inning. See how far you can push it. It would have been a team defining moment, and Hyde gave that up. 

But all in all, Hess seemed to take it in stride. I think we're all more upset about this than the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Barnaby Graves said:

Probably Elias more than Hyde is behind this decision, but I won't pretend I have any insight into how they're managing things.  I just assume something like that come from the top.  In any case, Elias was hired for a certain approach and expertise, which I think is what we're seeing here, and he should be judged over a few years of making thousands of decisions, and not just pulling Hess.  It still triggers my Mother's Day Massacre PTSD.

I doubt that Elias gave Hyde any such instructions either before or during the game.  Was following on gamecast and was sorry to see Hess pulled.  But I understand Hyde’s thinking.  If you read Hess’s post game comments, it looks like he understands too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

I doubt that Elias gave Hyde any such instructions either before or during the game.  Was following on gamecast and was sorry to see Hess pulled.  But I understand Hyde’s thinking.  If you read Hess’s post game comments, it looks like he understands too.

Pertinent quotes here:  http://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/04/brandon-hyde-and-david-hess-on-his-gem-versus-toronto.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

“I think the biggest thing is that he cares about us a lot,” Hess said. “It’s hard as a player and, I’m sure, harder as a manager to pull a guy for the thought process of keeping him healthy and his well-being. So I have a ton of respect for him in the short time we’ve been together. He makes decisions that are based on the longevity of a player. He’s not thinking what is good right now but is thinking ahead and wants to take care of us. Biggest thing is he cares about each individual guy in this clubhouse and us as a team, and that really shows.”

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say that I do not disagree with the decision to remove him. However, regarding pitch counts, I was just re-reading a hilarious book called “seasons in hell” about the early Texas Rangers, and I just happened to be reading the part about Jim Bibby’s complete game no-hitter.

He threw 148 pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteveA said:

So let me get this straight, if they had let him finish the inning and taken him out after 7, you wouldn't be complaining just as loudly?   Honestly,.

I don't believe I'm complaining loudly. Just giving an opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Santandah said:

“I think the biggest thing is that he cares about us a lot,” Hess said. “It’s hard as a player and, I’m sure, harder as a manager to pull a guy for the thought process of keeping him healthy and his well-being. So I have a ton of respect for him in the short time we’ve been together. He makes decisions that are based on the longevity of a player. He’s not thinking what is good right now but is thinking ahead and wants to take care of us. Biggest thing is he cares about each individual guy in this clubhouse and us as a team, and that really shows.”

Good stuff, and also indicative of a clubhouse which is taking the new approach to heart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Santandah said:

“I think the biggest thing is that he cares about us a lot,” Hess said. “It’s hard as a player and, I’m sure, harder as a manager to pull a guy for the thought process of keeping him healthy and his well-being. So I have a ton of respect for him in the short time we’ve been together. He makes decisions that are based on the longevity of a player. He’s not thinking what is good right now but is thinking ahead and wants to take care of us. Biggest thing is he cares about each individual guy in this clubhouse and us as a team, and that really shows.”

Hess basically saying he understands right now but will think about what could have been the rest of his life. 

My thinking is that you have to just weigh more than pitches thrown right there. Hess wasn’t laboring. He was having quick innings. Our offense was actually giving him a chance to rest. Basically, Hess was getting proper rest between innings. 

However I can see the flip side of what if he’s at 100+ pitches going into the 9th. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Hess basically saying he understands right now but will think about what could have been the rest of his life. 

My thinking is that you have to just weigh more than pitches thrown right there. Hess wasn’t laboring. He was having quick innings. Our offense was actually giving him a chance to rest. Basically, Hess was getting proper rest between innings. 

However I can see the flip side of what if he’s at 100+ pitches going into the 9th. 

I'm not sure how you get out of the quote that you quoted that Hess will think about what could have been for the rest of his life.  Did he say something about that elsewhere?  

I was fine with the move.  No-hitters are neat but are relatively common among the "special" feats in baseball.  If he had a perfect game going, I think that would be a much more difficult decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

I'm not sure how you get out of the quote that you quoted that Hess will think about what could have been for the rest of his life.  Did he say something about that elsewhere?  

I was fine with the move.  No-hitters are neat but are relatively common among the "special" feats in baseball.  If he had a perfect game going, I think that would be a much more difficult decision.

You don’t think Hess is always going to wonder what could’ve been when he was 8 outs away and having the best stuff of his life?  He is human. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, sportsfan8703 said:

You don’t think Hess is always going to wonder what could’ve been when he was 8 outs away and having the best stuff of his life?  He is human. 

I didn't say that.  I just wondered where you got that idea from from what you quoted, because he didn't say anything about that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

I didn't say that.  I just wondered where you got that idea from from what you quoted, because he didn't say anything about that.

Just piecing together the obvious. Hess sounds like nothing but a great teammate and a coachable player. It would just be extremely hard to not wonder about that the rest of your life. 

A no hitter is still a no hitter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I think we're saying the same thing, or at least we rhyme. If they're going to include one league that has completely different quality of play, why not all leagues? Why stop at the Negro Leagues?
    • Baseball is different from most other team sports in a number of key aspects: The number of trials. 162 games is a lot of games to have random variation smooth out. If you pick random 16-game stretches you'll have NFL-like outliers, such as teams going 15-1 or 1-15. Nobody goes 150-12. Pitchers are very limited in how much they can pitch. A 200-inning starter can only have so much impact. Hitters cannot get more than ~1/8th of a team's PAs. This and the prior point means that there's no way around having your 3rd- and 5th and even 14th-best players getting almost as much playing time as #1. So you end up with the most dominant teams usually not even winning 2/3rds of their games, wherein other sports you can have teams win 80% or more. Which makes baseball look more random. Contributing to this is the expanded playoffs, where a .600 vs .575 matchup is more-or-less a coin flip. I doubt most other sports have a situation where the obviously best team in the league has a 25%-ish shot of the Championship (in other words, a 75% chance of going home disappointed) on day one of the playoffs. In most soccer leagues the regular season champ is The Champ, so there's a 0% chance of that. The best team always takes a big trophy home.
    • He got rewarded for swinging at a ball at his ankles.  He might also be able to hit a fastball up around his neck for a home run.  If he consistently swings at those types of pitches it will be to his detriment over the long run.  
    • People really underestimate luck and randomness. Drungo is right….baseball is no different than any other sport.
    • Yandy Diaz' BABIP for his career is .320. Last year it was .367. While batters exercise a larger degree of control over their BABIPs than pitchers, there is still a lot of noise (i.e. luck) in the data. This year his BABIP is down about 90 points compared to last. I would bet that's about equal parts not hitting the ball as well, and not having the balls he does hit fall in.
    • I think it can certainly be part of the recipe. 
    • Sure. But isn't that like saying a player pitched 85 innings of relief with a 3.00 ERA one year, then the next year he pitched 220 innings as a starter with a 3.00 ERA. I wouldn't say that was a consistent, expected performance.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...