Jump to content

Dan Straily 2019


interloper

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The idea behind the Nate Karns signing was not tanking.  It was cheap but the goal was to improve the starting pitching with a guy who was more of a band aid than a future nugget.  They were not averse to having Karns in the rotation and Wright in the pen or DFA.  I would think Straily might be in play at the right price.  Meaning they might pick up the whole 5M, send something to Miami where Miami absorbs some of the 5M, or see if Straily clears and sign him for less.

I mean, I still think we are basically tanking.  But I agree that the reasons you sign a guy like Nate Karns could be the same reasons you get someone like Gio Gonzalez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 336
  • Created
  • Last Reply
2 minutes ago, Aglets said:

I mean, I still think we are basically tanking.  But I agree that the reasons you sign a guy like Nate Karns could be the same reasons you get someone like Gio Gonzalez.

But the Yankees signed Gio. Can you imagine you are Gio Gonzalez and your agent calls, "Gio, we've got an offer from the Yankees and an identical offer from the Orioles. Which would you prefer?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RZNJ said:

And probably the main reason to get a Karns or Straily on the cheap is to hope they come through and you can flip them later.

I don't see how a starter making $5mm who only pitched 112 innings last year is considered cheap. Didn't he also have an injury problem this ST? Reward is not enough for the risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Why did Florida DFA him?

Opening innings for Sandy Alcantara, Caleb Smith, Trevor Richards and Pablo Lopez.  That batch is kind of where we'd like Kremer, Tate, Ortiz and maybe even DL Hall to be in a year.

Just wait - Wei-Yin Chen could be next, or pushed to the bullpen.

If Cashner had gotten the 3rd year from DD, he'd be set for next year DFA too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

And probably the main reason to get a Karns or Straily on the cheap is to hope they come through and you can flip them later.

1st half Orioles - big league extended spring training for guys who can help your wildcard push this summer.   Not that there's anything wrong with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

Opening innings for Sandy Alcantara, Caleb Smith, Trevor Richards and Pablo Lopez.  That batch is kind of where we'd like Kremer, Tate, Ortiz and maybe even DL Hall to be in a year.

Just wait - Wei-Yin Chen could be next, or pushed to the bullpen.

If Cashner had gotten the 3rd year from DD, he'd be set for next year DFA too.

I thought Chen was a poor fit for the pen, and he takes too long to warm up.

Dont blame DD, I think Cashner is a King Peter move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

The idea behind the Nate Karns signing was not tanking.  It was cheap but the goal was to improve the starting pitching with a guy who was more of a band aid than a future nugget.  They were not averse to having Karns in the rotation and Wright in the pen or DFA.  I would think Straily might be in play at the right price.  Meaning they might pick up the whole 5M, send something to Miami where Miami absorbs some of the 5M, or see if Straily clears and sign him for less.

Elias is not interested in spending 5m on a starter.   If he can get one for under a million then he may be interested.  The O's have almost no chance to get Straily.  If he becomes a FA then Baltimore is not a place he would come to rebuild his value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

Why did Florida DFA him?

To save money. They tendered him last fall for $5 million and were hoping to find a trade partner. They were unsuccessful and by releasing him now they only have to pay them $1.2 million and they could save the rest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Elias is not interested in spending 5m on a starter.   If he can get one for under a million then he may be interested.  The O's have almost no chance to get Straily.  If he becomes a FA then Baltimore is not a place he would come to rebuild his value.

Perhaps. But Elias was quoted as saying he was focused on SP in re: to late ST waiver claims. He might be playing by slightly different rules when it comes to the rotation.

Ultimately, I think you're probably correct here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, interloper said:

Perhaps. But Elias was quoted as saying he was focused on SP in re: to late ST waiver claims. He might be playing by slightly different rules when it comes to the rotation.

Ultimately, I think you're probably correct here. 

Jose Lopez is more up  Elias ally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Elias is not interested in spending 5m on a starter.   If he can get one for under a million then he may be interested.  The O's have almost no chance to get Straily.  If he becomes a FA then Baltimore is not a place he would come to rebuild his value.

It could be his only option if he wants to start every 5th day, which I imagine is how he sees himself.  He's a poster child for the kind of steady MLB vet whose role is being cannibalized by hotshot bullpen guys pushing up toward 100-inning workloads.  I'm working on adapting my brain to the weird notion that 4th and 5th starters don't really exist anymore. 

Even guys like JA Happ and Masahiro Tanaka, their services are necessary for the 162 and to try and stay out of the wildcard game, but I don't imagine the Yanks really want them pitching much in October.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Roy , thanks for showing these stats side by side . I didnt realize just how good Mayo really is . Now I’m going with don’t trade Coby camp . They better get some return if they do
    • Good Lord, somewhere I lost track of this thread only to see it derailed into 10 others subjects. 1) Please keep on the subject of Jackson Holliday 2) My thoughts on Jackson Holliday's "Athleticism." First off, Holliday has very good speed, has made some very good plays defensively while on the move, and is playing professional baseball with the best in the world, that in in of itself makes him above average athletically. Now, saying that, he's not an extreme quick twitch guy and he doesn't have that explosive first step you'd typically want in a shortstop. That combined with his below average arm was why I pretty quickly concluded that shortstop would be a stretch for him without additional physical development.  3) The arm woes could very well be from him trying to improve his arm strength this offseason. I don't know what his routine was, but watching him lob balls around the infield tells me he was saving his arm and was kind of treating it with "kid gloves" which suggests he was not 100%. How much that has affected his hitting, I don't know, but his domination by major league pitchers was most likely not because of elbow discomfort. 4) I've said for awhile that Jackson Holliday is untouchable along with Basallo and Mayo, and I still think it would take a ton of a return that would include controllable players before I would consider moving him, but I'm starting to think he might be the guy that could get an impact return that I'd be willing to move.  Now why would I be willing to move him? Quite simply because I would have no issue with an infield of Mayo at 3B and Westburg at 2B. Now, before people overreact here and say I'm down on Holliday, I'm not. I still think he's going to end up a very high OBP hitter with some pop and would look very good on top of this lineup one day. At no point do you give him away and he's certainly not traded for just a rental for this year, but I would listen.     
    • I agree this is the most questionable part of the Elias MO. Although it is hard to dispute results so far, unless you've already jumped ship following 5 losses.  Personally (as an armchair GM) I would have sold high on Hays, Mullins, Urias, to net some young arms. Borderline Santander and Mountcastle too (though their peak might be now vs. last year). Maybe even Cano after last year! But this is not only hindsight, it also overlooks whatever value chemistry, veteranosity, seniority, continuity, risk mgt., etc. hold in the mysteries of the Sigbot.
    • Good point....have an embarrassment of riches in their system. It really is a testament to their scouting and development that they regularly have guys to "give away" when they want a supporting player to help their bench of all things.  So, then, Mateo as the headliner is not as farfetched as it seems for the right team and Dodgers could be the right team for him as well.
    • He may have prioritized a multi year solution, but if he also knew that even with those injuries the addition of Burnes would be part of a team sitting at .620 I bet he would have done it anyway.
    • The obvious follow up question to Coby vs Gunnar in AAA is this? Could either one of them hit Trevor Bauer?
    • Evidence? There's not enough data to support the idea that a six-man rotation does anything more than give an extra day of rest to guys who should pitch more, not less. And I can arguably make the case that a four-man rotation was more successful back in the day AND there were less major arm injuries. I know I'm probably in the minority here, but that just means a lot of you are wrong!
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...