Jump to content

O's 2020 MLB Draft Chat: Picking #2/30/39/74


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

They did let Reyes go, sounds like they have his replacement.

On the bright side, the video bio  of him on mlb.com says there is some "swing and miss" to his game and his fielding skills are "okay".  They think he'll be moved to 1B or LF.  You can never have enough big, plodding guys that strike out a lot in your organization, I say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yossarian said:

On the bright side, the video bio  of him on mlb.com says there is some "swing and miss" to his game and his fielding skills are "okay".  They think he'll be moved to 1B or LF.  You can never have enough big, plodding guys that strike out a lot in your organization, I say.

I should add one-dimensional to that statement.  Love these guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Yossarian said:

On the bright side, the video bio  of him on mlb.com says there is some "swing and miss" to his game and his fielding skills are "okay".  They think he'll be moved to 1B or LF.  You can never have enough big, plodding guys that strike out a lot in your organization, I say.

It does it get awful hot in the summertime, I'm sure a steady breeze will be welcome in the stadium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was genuinely optimistic coming into this draft. I quickly became pessimistic after the second and 3rd pick. Then genuinely disappointed. Now alarmed. 

I think the only way this draft could have worked for us is if we could trade down 5-6 or 15-20 slots to take the guy we really wanted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, baltfan said:

The Orioles are going to be signing soooooo many $20k pitchers.

I'm no expert... but I don't think there's going to be very many at all of the $20k signs, for any team. Maybe some college seniors but even they will have another year of eligibility. If I'm a HS senior, $20k is a pittance when you have a full ride to a good school. Get an education and play in some of the best organizations in the country. Plus be kings of the campus and rock stars on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scOtt said:

I'm no expert... but I don't think there's going to be very many at all of the $20k signs, for any team. Maybe some college seniors but even they will have another year of eligibility. If I'm a HS senior, $20k is a pittance when you have a full ride to a good school. Get an education and play in some of the best organizations in the country.

I think you'll get some HS kids that just don't want to go to school or don't have a school to go to.

Not that many "full rides" out there for baseball players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think you'll get some HS kids that just don't want to go to school or don't have a school to go to.

Not that many "full rides" out there for baseball players.

I guess lesser talents... like a second tier. I didn't think of that. Top guys surely all have scholarships. But you're right, guys that have talent, and don't have scholarships, a lot of them could sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • If thats where he's at 1B or Dh there will be no extension. The bat woud have to be super special. and it's not. we already have like 3 of those Mounty, O'hearn and Mayo
    • The on field product has the talent to win and bring out fans now.  I’m not saying not to spend more money.  Your first paragraph I agree with. The new owner assumes all the “debts” leftover. Ultimately it’s their responsibility to repair it.    They screwed up big time with their pricing. If this team rebounds and gets in the DS the excitement will pick up. Only the last week did they have any momentum after months of losing it. 
    • That’s a very good point, but then you have the question whether you would be willing to give up McDermott plus for erceg, and that’s an easy trade to make. Plus, the athletics need almost everything, they wouldn’t want Hays But we could’ve found something to satisfy them.
    • IMO, this mindset ("new chapter") is part of the problem. We can't act like the past and the terrible relationship that the org had with it's customer base does not matter or have a carryover effect. Whether the org calls itself "new" or not IMO is irrelevant. The issue is whether or not it will operate in enough meaningful different ways. If the org wants more of it's market to be engaged it is going to have to raise the bar to championship expectations and invest more in the on-field product. That would be different from the past and would indeed reflect that something is "new".
    • All of you guys talking about empty seats and an unengaged fanbase - did you not see the post showing over 41K in attendance, more than in MIL or HOU?  Are those fan bases also unengaged or disinterested? This is much ado about absolutely nothing.
    • I think at this point its just semantics regarding what a successful deadline looked like.  Elias upgraded three positions - SP, 2 RP.  Could there have been bigger upgrades?  Sure, at a bigger cost.  I think it was sufficient.  What has killed the team is the hitting.  If this team had hit like its capable of, and Soto, Eflin, and Dominguez all pitched exactly as they have, we'd all be feeling a lot better about the team, and probably lauding Elias for those three pickups and what a great boost they were at the deadline.  But we aren't hitting - at all - and I don't know what he could have done at the deadline to fix that. Already agreed that the draft strategy must evolve. I don't agree it was a bad strategy to do what they did so far, but it does have to evolve, just as the organization as a whole has evolved.  And I think it will.
    • I don't mean this as any kind of personal slight toward you. Please do not take this as such. But people/fans showed how they felt about this team who has been a loser for almost 4 months. And largely continued to hedge (beyond the Eflin addition) at the deadline. I bet you who did not have a bunch of empty seats for their playoff game yesterday .... San Diego. IMO it is because of the effort that they put in to continue to engage the fanbase. You can't sell people on the "homegrown" stars idea and no need to add a lot of outside talent. And then some of those "homegrown stars" who were so hyped flop. And then not extend the ones who turn into stars. That communicates a lack of investment by the org. Now when you add that up in the economy/2024 inflation and combine that with all of the other entertainment choices that people have in 2024; things like this will happen. Empty seats during a playoff game = an unengaged/unexcited fan base. The org has to own much of this.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...