Jump to content

Mancini Trade Package


bird watcher

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, weams said:

Proactive in that they are not obligating salary until they are competitive again?

If they know that Mancini isn't going to be here when we're competitive again, then why not try to trade him now while he's coming off a "big" year?  Obviously, there has to be two to tango.  

I just don't like the idea of playing out the string, when everyone knows what's going to happen.  Just make it happen now, and possibly get a better return.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

If they know that Mancini isn't going to be here when we're competitive again, then why not try to trade him now while he's coming off a "big" year?  Obviously, there has to be two to tango.  

I just don't like the idea of playing out the string, when everyone knows what's going to happen.  Just make it happen now, and possibly get a better return.  

Don't worry. Trey will get traded when someone wants him. Whether Roch believes or not. C.J. Cron is getting non tendered. Guys like Trey are not currently popular for money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, weams said:

Don't worry. Trey will get traded when someone wants him. Whether Roch believes or not. C.J. Cron is getting non tendered. Guys like Trey are not currently popular for money. 

I agree.  That gives me little hope that they'd to a long term deal with Mountcastle.  I think they'll just delay his start time until they get 7 years of control of him, and then just be content with that.  Diaz might be the first prospect that we look to extend, but he got paid a pretty good signing bonus out of Cuba, so I doubt he'd give us too much of a discount.  

Edited by sportsfan8703
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I agree.  That gives me little hope that they'd to a long term deal with Mountcastle.  I think they'll just delay his start time until they get 7 years of control of him, and then just be content with that.  Diaz might be the first prospect that we look to extend, but he got paid a pretty good signing bonus out of Cuba, so I doubt he'd give us too much of a discount.  

Yes, and yes. Though half of Diaz' expense went to MLB as a cap fine. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, weams said:

Yes, and yes. Though half of Diaz' expense went to MLB as a cap fine. 

Diaz got 15.5 million in a signing bonus.  I don't think we're going to get a big time team friendly deal from him.  Just to go further, AR got a pretty big bonus with being the #1 pick.  We might not even have a player in the system that would be a realistic extend option at the moment.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, weams said:

Don't worry. Trey will get traded when someone wants him. Whether Roch believes or not. C.J. Cron is getting non tendered. Guys like Trey are not currently popular for money. 

I’m not disagreeing with your overall point, but Trey is a much better player than C.J. Cron in my opinion.    Cron has never had a season above 2.0 WAR, and Trey has had two in his first three years.   Trey has a career OPS+ of 119 to Cron’s 110.

FWIW, I do not think Trey will get $5.7 mm in arbitration as MLBTR projects.    I think he comes in under $5 mm.   Not sure what they’re smoking over there at MLBTR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’m not disagreeing with your overall point, but Trey is a much better player than C.J. Cron in my opinion.    Cron has never had a season above 2.0 WAR, and Trey has had two in his first three years.   Trey has a career OPS+ of 119 to Cron’s 110.

FWIW, I do not think Trey will get $5.7 mm in arbitration as MLBTR projects.    I think he comes in under $5 mm.   Not sure what they’re smoking over there at MLBTR.

They have almost always been right. Maybe this new trend will get them flatfooted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, weams said:

They have almost always been right. Maybe this new trend will get them flatfooted. 

I disagree that they have almost always been right.    They’re generally in the ballpark, but they’ve been off by $1 mm+ many times.    For example, in 2018 they projected Gausman for $6.8 mm and he got $5.6 mm.   They had Manny at $17.3 mm, and he got $16 mm.    They had Schoop at $9.1 mm, and he got $8.5 mm (not off by $1 mm, but $600 k is still a lot).    

They are significantly wrong on Villar and Mancini IMO.    However, we probably won’t find out what Villar would have gotten if he had been tendered.    I expect we will find out about Mancini.    

I don’t think they’re far off base on any of the others, though they ended up $185 k on Bleier.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

I disagree that they have almost always been right.    They’re generally in the ballpark, but they’ve been off by $1 mm+ many times.    For example, in 2018 they projected Gausman for $6.8 mm and he got $5.6 mm.   They had Manny at $17.3 mm, and he got $16 mm.    They had Schoop at $9.1 mm, and he got $8.5 mm (not off by $1 mm, but $600 k is still a lot).    

They are significantly wrong on Villar and Mancini IMO.    However, we probably won’t find out what Villar would have gotten if he had been tendered.    I expect we will find out about Mancini.    

I don’t think they’re far off base on any of the others, though they ended up $185 k on Bleier.   

 

 

I think 90th percentile is good guessing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

 

I don’t think they’re far off base on any of the others, though they ended up $185 k on Bleier.   

 

 

I only count it if they actually go to arbitration. And there are many variables then. A side can over play their position leaving the arbitrator no choice but to go with the other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I’m not disagreeing with your overall point, but Trey is a much better player than C.J. Cron in my opinion.    Cron has never had a season above 2.0 WAR, and Trey has had two in his first three years.   Trey has a career OPS+ of 119 to Cron’s 110.

FWIW, I do not think Trey will get $5.7 mm in arbitration as MLBTR projects.    I think he comes in under $5 mm.   Not sure what they’re smoking over there at MLBTR.

Mancini's a much better hitter than Cron. Just look at the splits. Much higher OBP too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weams said:

I think 90th percentile is good guessing. 

90th percentile of what?    This isn’t rocket science.   You basically look at what the player earned the year before and what similar players earned when they were at the same level of arbitration.    And you won’t find Mancini comps earning $5.7 mm in Arb-1.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • It's fine for GRod to get a spot on the All-Star  team. I hope he doesn't warm up or pitch.
    • 1. From the beginning of time until roughly 1980 an average MLB game was somewhere between 1:50 and 2:30, all shorter than today's games with the pitch clock. It's not primarily the pitch clock. 2. Even if the pitch clock were to be shown to increase injuries by some some amount, do we really want to go back to a game where the average time is 3+ hours and increasing every year? The glacial pace of pre-clock baseball was killing interest in the sport. MLB had become a recurring meme online because it was sooooo slloooooowwww. I'll take 10% or 20% more injuries if it means we get a game that's played at a reasonable pace and gametimes in line with the other major sports that play multiple times a week.
    • I was joking.  Always make for a good laugh anytime Elias picks somebody up off the scrap heap.  I actually agree with you though, his numbers at times are pretty decent.  Not a bad depth piece, especially if we pull ahead of the Yankees and need someone to eat some innings late in the season.
    • Definitely agree on Gunnar swing timing — kinda looked like Cowser last night where late on FB and ahead of offspeed/breaking balls.  Was the same on Sunday too. Re: Kjerstad and high cheese. Keep in mind that Kirby has 99th percentile values for his fastball (and also per baseball savant, mostly locates it up in the zone).  It’s probably the best fastball in the game right now for SPs (edit, just looked it up, and only guy I see at 100 pitch value for FB is Crochet). 
    • Like I said the other day, it would be nice to hear from some scouts, the org or whoever about all the walks, lack of power, lack of BA, etc…is he tweaking things? Is the elbow bothering him to where he can’t drive the ball? Is he getting nothing to hit?     I’m surprised someone from the Banner hasn’t gotten into this because it’s obviously a big story and one that should be reported on.  
    • One thing to note is that Jackson made swing tweaks his first three weeks back in Norfolk but then abandoned them because they “didn’t feel great”. From this Baltimore Banner article:  “Earlier, as he fiddled, Holliday felt he was “surviving” and “didn’t feel great” about where his swing was, even though he produced at the Triple-A level upon his return. That has since changed. Over the last two weeks, particularly, Holliday’s return to the mechanics he’s more familiar with has helped him get back on track.” His contact rate really dropped off when he reverted back to his familiar mechanics. I worry that he gave up on the changes too soon. First three weeks back vs. after (includes tracked pitches and non-bunts)   PAs    K%           wOBA  xwOBA whiff % 4/27-5/18 91 19.8% .366 .349 21.6% 5/19-7/2 118 28.8% .392 .337 32.1%     PAs    EV      hard hit % barrel/PA 4/27-5/18 91 89.5 44.4% 4.4% 5/19-7/2 118 89.8 44.6% 4.2%
    • Sure. And his ligaments would have likely snapped, and he'd have put that college degree to good use instead of being a ballplayer. Or he would have thrown at 90% like most everyone else and topped out with Cedar Rapids in the Three-I League.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...