Jump to content

Recent roster move/IL rundown (try to keep up)


interloper

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 120
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This is an apparent list of Free Agent pitchers.  Any of them worth signing?  Would any of them sign for minimum?

https://www.spotrac.com/mlb/free-agents/starting-pitcher/available/

We're starting to get dangerously thin on stable starter options.  Its not about winning, but if we can't eat some innings, it starts to hurt development.  Cashner, Bundy, Means is a fairly stable top 3, averaging 5-6 innings.  But beyond that, do we really think someone is going to step up out of Ynoa, Hess, Ortiz, or Rogers? Ramirez is already gone.  Seems like they are starting to lean towards using Yac in the bullpen.  Maybe Gilmartin steps up big tonight.

What do we have at AAA?  Luis Ysla? Tyler Herb? Chandler Shepard?  Are you kidding me?  They aren't the answer.  I'm hoping Eshelman can step up and offer a few quality starts.  I saw give Keegan Akin a shot too. He's 24, its his 4th year in the organization, and he's striking people out at 11.1 K/9 clip.  

Signing Straily was a good idea that went horribly wrong.  I think they were hoping for a 5-6 inning guy who kept an ERA under 6.   Is there a free agent worth signing on that list who can eat some innings? I know a lot of those names struggled with injury.  Are any currently working out and trying to stay in shape?  How long would it take them to get ready?  Is Bartolo retired? After Shields and him, Gallardo and McCarthy have thrown the most innings recently.

Heading out of the All Star break it would be nice to see Means, Bundy, Cashner, Eshelman, Added Free Agent pitcher.  If Cashner or Bundy is traded, Akin can be called up. Elias might find a sneaky way to acquire some more AAA/AAAA options.  I don't think he's interested in starting the clock on any of his AA prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Philip said:

Oh I didn’t suggest that he wasn’t. I just don’t think Scott should be the choice.

Bullpen game? Is that when the bullpen starts the game then the starter comes in later? I’ve heard the term but can’t remember just what bullpen game means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tx Oriole said:

Bullpen game? Is that when the bullpen starts the game then the starter comes in later? I’ve heard the term but can’t remember just what bullpen game means.

A Bullpen Game is when a team uses just Bullpen Pieces for the game,  An opener game is as you described it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, thezeroes said:

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/s/samarje01.shtml

Some players do get it right after a few years of recalls.

Yes, certainly Randy Johnson did, but most do not. There is a wide span between success at AAA and success in the big leagues.

If we sat down and made a list of the guys in the upper oriole system probably we’re not going to span that gap, it would be a pretty big list. 

It remains to be seen where Scott is going to end up, I hope he does well in this stint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does a pitcher prepare for what he is going to see at the MLB Level if he does not get the chances to iron the wrinkles out??? 

 

Not every one that gets promoted instantly has success and not everyone that gets multiple chances , stick.  At some point the proof will be in the performance but with out allowing the performer to perform, you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Philip said:

What has Scott shown that indicates he’s a productive member of a good team?

Don’t get me wrong, I want him to do well, but when he’s up with the big team, he doesn’t.

What’s being on a good team have to do with anything?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, thezeroes said:

How does a pitcher prepare for what he is going to see at the MLB Level if he does not get the chances to iron the wrinkles out??? 

 

Not every one that gets promoted instantly has success and not everyone that gets multiple chances , stick.  At some point the proof will be in the performance but with out allowing the performer to perform, you never know.

Well that’s certainly true, but at what point does one say, “OK he’s had some chances let’s try the next guy”?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Philip said:

What has Scott shown that indicates he’s a productive member of a good team?

Don’t get me wrong, I want him to do well, but when he’s up with the big team, he doesn’t.

Nothing wrong with being negative about this team.  There is a lot of that going around.   

I just think Scott has done what he needed to over the last month to get another chance in the majors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Frobby said:

What’s being on a good team have to do with anything?

 Well presumably we are looking for guys who have the potential to be on our next competitive team. Of the current 25 man roster, I am unsure how many guys have that potential. When we look at the 40 man, I am unsure how many guys have that potential as well. There are a lot of guys with upside, but they are farther away with lots of potential pitfalls between here in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Why does everybody want to jump and label a kid so fast? What is this, his 2nd major-league season? Yes, certainly they shouldn't go into next year thinking he's a lock for 30+ starts and 180-200 innings but we can't say he's already reached his peak either. 
    • And their defense is very good. To put things in perspective, the Tigers collective dWAR is +0.5. The Orioles is -2.8. Minnesota -4.1, Yankees -0.3, Houston -0.1, Seattle +2.0, Royals at +2.5. The Royals really standout as most of that value is driven by Fermin (catcher) and Witt.  But I think my point is that the Tigers have excellent pitching (starting pitching and bullpen) as well as excellent defense. And they're not putrid with the bats.  I would say the one saving grace about the Tigers is they don't run much. 
    • We could have easily swept Detroit in Baltimore, the lineup we have now is not the lineup they faced. It doesn't matter who the opponent is, just win.
    • Both of them are important to consider here. They could have a mediocre offense every single game of the season, but if the pitching is elite (and it is!), it'll carry them.  We have 6 games against the Tigers this year. And yes, most of them were without the cadre of regulars. But here are the offensive numbers against them: .211/.282/.392 - .674 OPS They scored 20 runs in 6 games against them. Barely scraping 3 R/G. And a good portion of them coming in *1* game.  Out of the WC potentials the O's could face, here are their R/G: Royals: 29 in 6 games = 4.8 R/G Twins: 22 in 3 = 7.3 R/G Mariners: 27 in 6 = 4.5 R/G Tigers: 20 in 6 = 3.3 R/G Out of all the playoff teams, the best RA/G are the Mariners (3.75), Guardians (3.85), and Tigers (4.96). For the playoffs, you want to look at who you're facing on the bump. Which team scares you the most? Because if you can't hit against the team, it doesn't matter what the opposing offense is.  Also you'll want to consider the best fielding teams, too.   Seems to me you'd want to face the team you matchup best against *and* who has the worst defense and worst pitching, because presumably your 3 starters (Burnes, Eflin, Kremer) should be able to hold teams in check. 
    • I'd prefer Detroit - they've been so hot for so long they should be due to cool off. KC has been just the opposite. 
    • I'd say the Royals...pitch around Witt and Salvy Perez who seems to have had our number in recent years.  The rest of their lineup isn't too imposing. Wacha  -a guy I wanted this offseason and was laughed at for wanting him- has a 2.64 ERA over his last 15 starts.  He's the soft-tossing type that gives our lineup fits and, IIRC, he was great against us earlier this year.  Lugo has had a great year, so has Ragans.  Their starters are good. But they're 3-7 over their last 10 while the Tigers are 8-2.  A lot of the postseason, IMO, is catching teams at the right/wrong time.  This could all change by next week but the Tigers are hot, the Royals are not... Then again, I said I wanted to face Texas in the first round last year and look what happened.  So who knows.  
    • Would much rather face KC and to me it’s not close.    game 1 agains Skubal is an L. They’ve proven they can beat us with a bullpen game, a bullpen only behind CLE as best in the AL.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...