Jump to content

TT: Scouting the 40 man: Who will be part of a winning future?


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

Didn’t do a whole lot of research but to compare teams from 2015-2019

Yankees have 9 guys on both rosters, though I counted 3 60day guys

Dodgers also have 9 guys on both rosters. 

I’d be pretty happy with 5 guys out of this group but I think this amount of roster turnover may be more common than we think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys who have a decent chance IMO are Means, Mancini, Santander, Severino, Sisco, Kline and Scott. I do think Harvey has a great chance of being our closer of the future if he can stay healthy in his new role. Not all that high on Hays personally, but that could change as will this list over time I'm sure. Some of these guys we're seeing now will certainly be there and I do think one of the catchers will be and Rutschman will not be catching full time and could end up at 1B instead. I think Elias recognizes that if his bat is as advertised, it is more important to protect that asset and that includes not putting him at a position with a higher injury risk and cutting his high production years short.

Most of these guys probably won't be here, but some will be. CF, LF and all four IF positions will be different. I think Santander will nail down RF if he's here. If Mancini is here, he's DH and occasional 1B/RF. Starting rotation will be different obviously. Bundy may still be here. Some of our pitching in the minors will be, but I don't think we have any slam dunks down there for the rotation. Maybe Eshelman will earn a back-end spot, who knows? He's the most intriguing ATM since he's the most ready for an extended look and I guess we'll have that answer by the end of the season. Seems he may make his debut in the TB series. I'm sure there will be some surprises. Should be fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Frobby said:

Very interesting.   If you add up all the odds, we’d expect 5.5 players now on the roster to still be there in 2023.    

I’d love to hear the odds on the guys in AA/AAA now who aren’t on the 40-man.    I’d say several have better odds than all but Means, Harvey and Hays.

I’m sure Legend_of_Joey won’t be happy with the odds on Wynns.  

The writing is on the wall. I'm just glad he got time in the majors and atleast comes back up in September, if not sooner.

Severino and Sisco having such high percentages though was a shock. I figure one would be moved before then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

The writing is on the wall. I'm just glad he got time in the majors and atleast comes back up in September, if not sooner.

Severino and Sisco having such high percentages though was a shock. I figure one would be moved before then. 

He did a heck of a job even making the majors. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you can just look at the system in waves,

2020: Hitters. The names we know. Mountcastle, Hays, Mullins, Diaz. 

Akin, Harvey.

2021-2022: Pitchers. Look at the Bowie, Frederick, Delmarva staffs. 

AR.

2023: The NCAA hitters and Gunnar. 

Our next contending team is going to depend on the pitchers currently in AA-A. AR, next year’s top pick. 

With AR and the recent draft, our system 1-30 is probably average to above. We just have to improve that deep depth. That will get a significant boost with the international market and these big bonus pools for the draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sessh said:

Guys who have a decent chance IMO are Means, Mancini, Santander, Severino, Sisco, Kline and Scott. I do think Harvey has a great chance of being our closer of the future if he can stay healthy in his new role. Not all that high on Hays personally, but that could change as will this list over time I'm sure. Some of these guys we're seeing now will certainly be there and I do think one of the catchers will be and Rutschman will not be catching full time and could end up at 1B instead. I think Elias recognizes that if his bat is as advertised, it is more important to protect that asset and that includes not putting him at a position with a higher injury risk and cutting his high production years short.

Most of these guys probably won't be here, but some will be. CF, LF and all four IF positions will be different. I think Santander will nail down RF if he's here. If Mancini is here, he's DH and occasional 1B/RF. Starting rotation will be different obviously. Bundy may still be here. Some of our pitching in the minors will be, but I don't think we have any slam dunks down there for the rotation. Maybe Eshelman will earn a back-end spot, who knows? He's the most intriguing ATM since he's the most ready for an extended look and I guess we'll have that answer by the end of the season. Seems he may make his debut in the TB series. I'm sure there will be some surprises. Should be fun.

Unless we are signing Rutschman to a 15 year contract there is no need to move him off catcher before he becomes a free agent.  That would be a terrible waste of defensive talent.  

I think theoretically you can have AR catching 4 days a week and at 1B/DH 2-3 times a week. That should conserve his knees quite a bit.  Sisco could catch twice a week and play 1B/DH three to four times a week if his bat holds up.   

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I think you can just look at the system in waves,

2020: Hitters. The names we know. Mountcastle, Hays, Mullins, Diaz. 

Akin, Harvey.

2021-2022: Pitchers. Look at the Bowie, Frederick, Delmarva staffs. 

AR.

2023: The NCAA hitters and Gunnar. 

Our next contending team is going to depend on the pitchers currently in AA-A. AR, next year’s top pick. 

With AR and the recent draft, our system 1-30 is probably average to above. We just have to improve that deep depth. That will get a significant boost with the international market and these big bonus pools for the draft. 

I feel that most of the current Bowie starters will get starts in Baltimore at some point in 2020.  I expect a 2020 Norfolk rotation of Lowther, Wells, Zimmerman, Kremer, and Baumann.   One or two of them could potentially start the season in Baltimore.  So there could be some quick call-ups based on performance and need at the big league level.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Real cool article and chart.

I really hope John Means does continue his success from this year and becomes our reliable lefty starter for years to come.  I think he will be.

It'll be interesting to see what the catching unit looks like in a couple years.  Lot of good stuff here.  Wonder if there's any chance Sisco, Severino, and Rutschman will ever all be on the team at the same time?  With one of them playing some 1B or DH?

I feel like Mancini deserves to be ranked a little higher than "55 above average" this year.  I think he could at least be "60 plus", which is still below All Star level.  I guess his outfield defense just sinks him, but it sucks because he really should be playing 1B and its out of his hands.  If you look at his 2019 stats compared with all of the qualified AL first basemen, he ranks:

-3rd in OPS (.907)

-5th in HRs (17)

-1st in Avg. (.302)

-3rd in 2Bs (19)

 

That said, I think the 55 future rating for him is totally fair.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So to recap, here are the 40-man players by chance of contribution in 2022 and their Future Grade:

  • 80% Hunter Harvey (55)
  • 80% John Means (55)
  • 75% Trey Mancini (55)
  • 70% Austin Hays (55)
  • 50% Miguel Castro (45)
  • 50% Branden Kline (45)
  • 50% Pedro Severino (45)
  • 50% Chance Sisco (45)
  • 40% Anthony Santander (45)
  • 40% DJ Stewart (45)
    •  
  • 25% Hanser Alberto (45)
  • 25% Richie Martin (45)
  • 25% Cedric Mullins (40)
  • 25% Renato Nunez (50)
  • 10% Cody Carroll (40)
  • 10% Paul Fry (40)
  • 10% David Hess (45)
  • 10% Luis Ortiz (40)
  • 10% Evan Phillips (40)
  • 10% Taylor Scott (40)
  • 10% Chandler Shepherd (40)
  • 10% Dwight Smith Jr (45)
  • 10% Jimmy Yacabonis (45)

That's 23 players - everyone else is listed at 0%.  Interesting that Harvey and Hays are still near the top after being riddled with injuries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd put a FV on Sisco of 50 due to his offensive profile getting a big boost this year.  It looks like he's going to be an above average hitting catcher and he has the minor league track record to back it up.  

Severino may be a FV 45, but he's played at a current value 55 or 60 through half a season.  So his outlook may have to be reexamined after this season as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • I doubt Ortiz will have an 800+ OPS all year but I guess its possible. Right now the trade looks like a win for both teams. Milwaukee of course gets 5 more years after this to fully reap the benefits. 
    • Probably because of pitch count. Doesn’t change my point. 
    • Robert would be a significant upgrade over Mullins (offensively). Not sure how much of a difference the two have defensively. But as much as I like Mullins, he has been really bad with the bat in his hand for about a season now. Second half of last season and most of the first half of this season. Obviously the issue with Robert is his health/availability, so there would be risk there. But I wouldn't mind if Elias took a swing there, as long as this wouldn't be his only move. I would like to see Elias act bold and decisively this go round (at the deadline). I heard that the CHI SOX wanted a "Soto like" package (that the Nats got for trading him to the Pads) back for Robert. We know that they have a recent history of over asking on players they are in theory willing to trade. Anybody have a guess on what the realistic costs for Robert would be?
    • This is all correct. And to add to it, If Gunnar only continues being this version of Gunnar, he is out-valued only by the sole two-way player in baseball (Ohtani). So, comparing Soto to Gunnar in a vacuum might make some sense, their situations are vastly different. The closeness of the young guys has been well documented and we know that the group of Adley, Gunnar, Mountcastle, Stowers, Westy and Cowser are all strong in their faith. I do believe that will play some part in the contract finagling. I do not know any of them personally and with the union, the pressure of the sport, endorsements, etc. etc. ... I realize that at the end of the day guys are going to want what they are worth but I have long thought two things about this crop of players: they are incredibly consistent but they also seem to be genuinely good kids who want to win and put the team first. We don't know yet what will happen over the next few years with these players but I wouldn't be surprised to see a version of what the cast of Friends did early in the show's run, where they essentially formed their own union of sorts and structured their compensation so that none of them would become bigger than the sum of their parts. Again, I don't know them personally and I am fully in-tune with the idea that they all want to be paid but I think that their closeness means more to them than Soto's relationship with his teammates in Washington, and I think that holds true with respect to almost literally any other free agent in the history of the game. They are very unique in that they have this young group who are all 23 - 27 right now who are very tight. I happen to think that the stars of this team will be more inclined to consider more team-friendly deals if it means that their posse can stay in-tact for a longer duration of time. Call me naïve but that's how I see it. I've been intimately involved in the game at various levels myself and I can honestly say that I can't remember a group of young players who demonstrated a caring for each other to the same level of these kids. It could mean nothing when Gunnar is being thrown half a billion dollars or when Adley is offered the moon but I just don't see these players being as motivated by money as other (especially recent) stars.  I agree 100% that Gunnar would jump all over that Witt Jr. deal. I think he is smart enough to know that anything could happen over the next five years. Plus $288 million is a shitload of money. I don't know how  many generations of wealth that is but damn that's a lot of money for a soon to be 23 year old kid.   
    • There is a lot to like and I can't see why nobody would want him but for the possibility that he won't help the team much in October 2024, the cost would probably be an absurd ask.
    • I think the focus is going to be on relief pitching.   I don't think any of the guys SG listed would be needed for the types of relievers the O's will be going after.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...