Jump to content

Santander drawing interest


Jammer7

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, LookinUp said:

Tony isn't a huge fan of Diaz. I think he's part of the reason you and I disagree. I have hope for him, but pretty low confidence.

Tony doesn’t but plenty of others do.

But Diaz is an issue because of his health, no doubt about that.  
 

But it’s more of an overall thing.  The team has drafted a lot of OF talent.  They have drafted a lot of MI talent, so of which will end up in the OF.  
 

The depth is there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

So we're back to risk tolerances. What you think is smart is not what I think is smart.

Funny thing about all of this is if Elias trades Santander tomorrow, I'll trust that he knows better. However, with the information I have now, I'll stick with the old bird in the hand is worth two in the bush mantra.

And you won't win in the AL East.

The O's have to take risks and have some of those risks pan out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

Tony doesn’t but plenty of others do.

But Diaz is an issue because of his health, no doubt about that.  
 

But it’s more of an overall thing.  The team has drafted a lot of OF talent.  They have drafted a lot of MI talent, so of which will end up in the OF.  
 

The depth is there.  

I think this is a good argument. I'm not sold that Stowers/Haskin/Diaz/Stewart/Kjerstad are the future. But depth matters and improves the odds for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

And you won't win in the AL East.

The O's have to take risks and have some of those risks pan out.

 

You can buy yourself out of any problem with personnel. If I had any confidence that the O's would do that if they created a hole, I'd feel better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

He may have been a core player in the clubhouse.  I don’t doubt that.  But he was worth about 5 WAR total for those 3 seasons.  He was a very valuable role player whose off the field presence was important for the players but the team didn’t lose much when he left either and that’s coming from someone who would put Markakis in his top 5 favorite Os players ever and probably top 3.  

He wasn’t a core player anymore. 

Right field has been a mess since Markakis left.  The team lost a lot when he left.  Santander is just beginning to improve that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That is 100% something you think.  That is not a fact.

 

Exactly right.  Wildcard is shocked that Mountcastle is the LFer this year, despite every single thing over the past year or so saying the Os view him as a LFer for the time being.  Maybe not for the long term but they certainly feel that way now and if he shows well there, they may end up keeping him there.

Either way, it’s certainly something WC is manufacturing in his mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

I think this is a good argument. I'm not sold that Stowers/Haskin/Diaz/Stewart/Kjerstad are the future. But depth matters and improves the odds for sure.

But yet you seem to be sold that Santander is the future...despite his career telling you otherwise.  
 

That’s the logic that makes no sense.  A guy who hasn’t even played 100 games in any season is “part of the future”.  I don’t get that at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Right field has been a mess since Markakis left.  The team lost a lot when he left.  Santander is just beginning to improve that.

It hasn’t been a mess because Nick left.  It’s been a mess because the organization was garbage at doing things smartly.

BtW, in the 6 seasons since he has been gone, Nick has been worth 5.8 WAR.  If that isn’t production you can replace, you have no business having a job in baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Exactly right.  Wildcard is shocked that Mountcastle is the LFer this year, despite every single thing over the past year or so saying the Os view him as a LFer the time being.  Maybe not for the long term but they certainly feel that way now and if he shows well there, they may end up keeping him there.

Either way, it’s certainly something WC is manufacturing in his mind.

Very small sample size and probably useless data set but he provided a lot more value when he was in left last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

That is 100% something you think.  That is not a fact.

As for Santander, either he pans out and as a Super 2 makes huge bank in arbitration or he doesn't pan out and becomes a non-tender candidate because he's a super 2.

Look at what happened to Schoop.

Schoop was not worth the money he was scheduled to get on a losing team.  The team was on its way down.

Hopefully Santander in on a team headed up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Exactly right.  Wildcard is shocked that Mountcastle is the LFer this year, despite every single thing over the past year or so saying the Os view him as a LFer the time being.  Maybe not for the long term but they certainly feel that way now and if he shows well there, they may end up keeping him there.

Either way, it’s certainly something WC is manufacturing in his mind.

You may be right.  We will see how it plays out on the field.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wildcard said:

You may be right.  We will see how it plays out on the field.   

There is no may be right.  It’s a fact that this is what they are doing right now.  Unless Mancini can’t play this year or something like that, Mountcastle is your LFer.

I find it interesting that you like to read between the lines on everything the manager and the organization say (like say Mullins for example) but you choose to ignore what they are doing and saying for Mountcastle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

But yet you seem to be sold that Santander is the future...despite his career telling you otherwise.  
 

That’s the logic that makes no sense.  A guy who hasn’t even played 100 games in any season is “part of the future”.  I don’t get that at all.

Now who's creating the straw man?

I believe that Santander can be a valuable contributor on a competitive Orioles team during his team control. That doesn't mean that I think he "is the future." 

You know he played a lot of games in 2019, minors and majors. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm not disregarding his past performance, but in general recent performance is more relevant if it's a decent sample size.  140 PAs is a pretty high number.  It's been pretty clear for awhile now that what he was once good at he's not good at right now.  I'd rather see Kjerstad bat against lefties than Slater at this point.    
    • Today was, thankfully, the last games vs the NL this year…barring a WS run of course. The Os finish 19-26 (that’s a sub 70 win% seasons) vs the NL and were outscored by 42 runs.     That means vs the AL he has outscored them by about 115 runs and are 24 games over 500.  
    • It’s the quietest 879 in the history of baseball. 
    • I disagree Mayo is one of the reasons the Orioles have not hit well.  Emmanuel Rivera, who has hit well with an .879 OPS since he joined the O's, has gotten the playing time over Mayo.  
    • I was sort taking that as a fait accompli. Signing expensive long-term free agent deals for one dimensional sluggers heading into their 30s definitely does not seem like Elias's style, especially when an extra high draft pick (and accompanying extra bonus pool money) is the reward for not doing so.
    • Game 153, Sept. 19 Lots of notable defensive plays today.   Kjerstad made two excellent catches, one going back and towards the RCF alley that (per Kevin Brown) was a 50% probability catch, and another going back to the wall near the corner and making the catch at close to full speed.   Holliday snared a line drive at the top of his leap, and also made a nice backhand running catch of a soft fly into medium RF. Mullins made a diving catch in the 7th on a sinking liner that he got a great jump on.   In the 9th, with runners on 1st and 2nd, Heliot hit a liner in the RCF gap that carried much further than it first appeared it would.   Mullins and Slater dove for it simultaneously and Slater actually gloved it for a second before it popped out while Slater landed on Mullins.  Luckily, the two base runners totally misread the play, and after Slater quickly scrambled to his feet and threw the ball in, the runner originally on 2B scored but the runner on 1st only advanced to 2B, and the batter had to stop at first.  The O’s were able to keep any further runs from scoring. One thing I’ve noticed about Manny Rivera is that he’s very slow charging bunts and slow rollers/choppers. He handled one bunt and one chopper in front of him today and both times the runner beat his throw rather easily, something that has happened a lot when Rivera has manned 3B.   I’m more than ready to have Urias -and/or Westburg back at the hot corner.    
    • Don’t know what happened to him on here but I did meet him and some others from The Sun forums at the park on Matt Wieters first game as an Oriole. If I recall correctly his name was Patrick.  He seemed like a good dude but he did have his face painted and was wearing those big hulk hands…which did strike me as a little odd for a grown man but to each his own. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...