Jump to content

Adam Hall 2021


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

He's not an org player for now, but he's a late Top-50 guy due to his contact issues, lack of power and defensive issues. He's worth continuing to follow but he looks a lot more like a Richie Martin type guy vs an everyday big leaguer.

If he can become a good defender at a few positions (including OF), he could be the bench guy you carry to have a plus runner in the late innings. But that's a luxury position. 

 

(but because of that I could also see him being taken in the rue 5 draft)

Edited by seak05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, seak05 said:

If he can become a good defender at a few positions (including OF), he could be the bench guy you carry to have a plus runner in the late innings. But that's a luxury position. 

 

(but because of that I could also see him being taken in the rue 5 draft)

I don’t see him getting taken in the rule 5. A guy like Mateo was on the waiver wire and cleared the whole NL. No team is carrying Hall. Heck he might repeat Aberdeen next year. He’s a fringe top 50 prospect that will have to fight for ABs next year whether that’s in Bowie or Aberdeen. 
 

The Delmarva explosion, and this most recent draft class, has really took some of the guaranteed ABs away from some struggling prospects. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Adam is looking to end the season well, batting leadoff, getting hits, AND taking walks.  

.697 OPS with 25 SB. Only 22. I don’t think we protect him from the rule 5, but he’s only 22 and is still filling out. If he’s a 2B that can put up a .700+ OPS in the MLB, then there is value there. Especially if he can sometimes play SS and CF. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

.697 OPS with 25 SB. Only 22. I don’t think we protect him from the rule 5, but he’s only 22 and is still filling out. If he’s a 2B that can put up a .700+ OPS in the MLB, then there is value there. Especially if he can sometimes play SS and CF. 

He's got a long way to go to be that kind of player.  He won't be protected or selected.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

I don’t think the rule 5 even comes into play with him, but I think he’s earning ABs. Some guys just have to fill out. 

He's 22 and been in the system 4 years.  He's still got plenty of time to make it but it might not be as an Oriole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing I like about Hall is his baserunning.  Not only has he stolen 25 bases, he’s only been caught once.  That was in the second game of the year.    Since then, 23 straight without a CS.   Prior to this year, he wasn’t quite that efficient, but still had an 80% success rate.   His OBP has always been good, but not as good this year as in the past, mostly because his K rate has spiked from 22% to 29%.    That’s a big issue going forward considering his lack of pop.   I don’t see him being protected or claimed but I still consider him an interesting prospect.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
    • Santander does exactly ONE thing very well: Hit HRs He doesn't hit for average, he doesn't get on base, he's a very slow runner, and he is a very poor defender. If he stops hitting HRs so often, his value completely evaporates and his contract basically becomes dead money, and the Orioles cannot afford to eat large amounts of dead money like the Dodgers, Mets, and Yankees of the world. I am simply using Trumbo, whose basic tool kit is very similar to Santander's, as a fairly recent, Orioles-related cautionary tale. Trumbo had his big walk year with the Orioles at age 30 and instead of doing the smart, obvious thing and taking the free draft pick, we gave him a big money extension that everyone except the FO knew was probably going to end poorly. Baseball Savant has Santander in the 22nd percentile in terms of overall fielding value. However you want to slice it, he isn't going to make up any lost value from declining offense with his defense. If his ability to slug goes south, the whole contract goes with it, because he has no other tools to make up for that with.
    • Santander is -2 OAA this year. He’s averagish to below average. There but there are much worse defensive right fielders such as Adolis Garcia and Castellanos -9, Lane Thomas and Renfroe -8, and Soto -4. Acuna and Tatis are also -2 OAA.  In 2016, Mark Trumbo was -15 OAA. They’re not even in the same universe.
    • Anthony Santander (age 27-29): .245 / .317 / .477 / .794    124 OPS+   9.0 rWAR Mark Trumbo (age 27-29): .244 / .299 / .443 / .742   105 OPS+  2.6 rWAR Is it really very meaningful that Trumbo was the better player when they were significantly younger? 29-year-old Santander is a better player by miles than Trumbo at the same age, and he has been for years. I think that’s what matters most to how you’d project them over the next few years.
    • I love Tony and I honestly think we are gonna miss his veteran leadership as much as anything. I’m very happy we have him for this year. But I do think he’d be a bad long term investment. 
    • He’s the best player in history. No one can convince me otherwise.  I didn’t say he has the most records or the most counting stats or the most MVPs. That’s not what I said.  He’s just the best player in baseball history. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...