Jump to content

Our old friend Jake Arrieta's has been waived by the Cubs


waynebug

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

The park has nothing to do with what happened.  Absolutely nothing.  It was piss poor coaching here.  

The Cubs saw what he had and he was immediately successful as soon as he stepped off the plane in Chicago.  Arrieta threw across his body a little bit which isn't ideal.  The Orioles tried to beat that out of him and it didn't work.  The Cubs let him do it, it's what made him great in college.  Turned in one of the most dominant pitching years of all time, several other good seasons and was a big part of getting them their sought after World Series win.

OPACY has nothing to do with why he was bad here.  That's lazy thinking.  

Adair was a major issue and Buck was the one that hired him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well then I guess it's Buck's fault, ultimately.  If we want to play that game.  

 

 

33 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well then I guess it's Buck's fault, ultimately.  If we want to play that game.  

 

I feel that way 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MurphDogg said:

He is only 35 and was decent as recently as last year.

He will definitely get another chance or two if he wants it. Not sure whether he would stomach playing in the minors if he didn't make a team, but he could certainly sign a minor league deal going into Spring Training with the hopes of making a team.

He just needs to spend 4 days at the Baseball Performance Center and some team will bite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • sbauer changed the title to Our old friend Jake Arrieta's has been waived by the Cubs
9 hours ago, murph said:

Most here know, but someone has to say it.  It wasn’t the ballpark but the Cubs allowing him to throw the way he is most comfortable.   Which apparently the O’s didn’t.   
 

I bet he finds a job somewhere if he wants.  

You mean he found “palates”(cough cough he gained a bunch of lean muscle). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well then I guess it's Buck's fault, ultimately.  If we want to play that game.  

 

I will beat the drum until the day I die. The Os screwed up Matusz and I don’t know the guy but wish he would have been drafted by another team for his sake. I mean he made a bunch of money, but I still to this day believe he could have been on par with Grienke stuff wise, pay wise, longevity wise and my feeling and would love to find out if I am right or wrong but between the ear wise. My auto correct won’t let me spell ZG, but his struggles are well documented but not sure if Matusz has said or Indeed had similar difficulties as a younger guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, sevastras said:

I will beat the drum until the day I die. The Os screwed up Matusz and I don’t know the guy but wish he would have been drafted by another team for his sake. I mean he made a bunch of money, but I still to this day believe he could have been on par with Grienke stuff wise, pay wise, longevity wise and my feeling and would love to find out if I am right or wrong but between the ear wise. My auto correct won’t let me spell ZG, but his struggles are well documented but not sure if Matusz has said or Indeed had similar difficulties as a younger guy. 

It's not like Matusz went on to find success elsewhere.  Arrieta did.  Gausman did (after stops in Cincinnati and Atlanta).  I'm more inclined to point blame at the Orioles for not being able to make those guys successful rather than dying on the Matusz hill.  That's a strange one.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

It's not like Matusz went on to find success elsewhere.  Arrieta did.  Gausman did (after stops in Cincinnati and Atlanta).  I'm more inclined to point blame at the Orioles for not being able to make those guys successful rather than dying on the Matusz hill.  That's a strange one.  

Matusz had a pretty bad case of Asthma, why a Mid Atlantic team in the most difficult allergy zone in the country would have selected him will always puzzle me. I think he could have been a very good pitcher on the West Coast / SouthWest 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, webbrick2010 said:

Matusz had a pretty bad case of Asthma, why a Mid Atlantic team in the most difficult allergy zone in the country would have selected him will always puzzle me. I think he could have been a very good pitcher on the West Coast / SouthWest 

He did, but whatever.  Again, he didn't go on to find success in Arizona or another place with a better climate.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought Buck was a terrific manager overall, but he had a blind spot when it came to young pitchers and his choices of pitching coaches were spotty.   The irony is, when Buck arrived in August 2010 the pitching had been very bad all year and then turned on a dime the minute Buck arrived.  Matusz was actually unbelievably good during that stretch, along with several other of the younger pitchers.  IMO Buck made a big mistake not sticking with what was working, and replacing Kranitz with Connor and then Adair.   I’ve always felt the TTTP issue was overblown as a cause of the pitchers’ problems, but it certainly didn’t help.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I thought Buck was a terrific manager overall, but he had a blind spot when it came to young pitchers and his choices of pitching coaches were spotty.   The irony is, when Buck arrived in August 2010 the pitching had been very bad all year and then turned on a dime the minute Buck arrived.  Matusz was actually unbelievably good during that stretch, along with several other of the younger pitchers.  IMO Buck made a big mistake not sticking with what was working, and replacing Kranitz with Connor and then Adair.   I’ve always felt the TTTP issue was overblown as a cause of the pitchers’ problems, but it certainly didn’t help.   

That really hurt.  A young pitching staff and no stability. I still would like to know the whole Connor story. I know he had some health issues. Pretty sure that was discussed before he was hired. Maybe they just hoped he would be ok. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • What he's been able to do at the plate has been a nice pick-me-up for the a team that has had multiple hitters struggling at the same time. For me though, watching how he's handled 2B this season has been a treat. The tag on the SB attempt last night was a play that not all 2B make.    There's been times I would have traded or released him for nothing, but right now I'm really glad he's still here.
    • If he stays right where he is right now hitting .245, he has very nice value. On pace for a 3-4 war season. As a secondary piece, that’s huge.
    • Adding relievers should be the priority, but that doesn't mean Elias won't look to strengthen our staff or add a hitter as well.  I'm not expecting us to trade for Luzardo, but it's a possibility with the injuries that our staff has been through. 
    • Luzardo is a really interesting target. On one hand, he is your Burnes replacement. A guy with high end starter potential (although less of a sure thing than Burnes) who you would have for 2 more years. OTOH, it feels like he could be a ticking time bomb…and yes you can say that about most pitchers but some are worse than others. Im not sure im giving up Povich or McDermott in a Luzardo deal because we just don’t have much depth right now after them. A year or 2 from now, the depth has the potential to look a lot better but we aren’t there yet. Besides the obvious 3 prospects, DeLeon, Povich and McDermott are the next 3 guys I really want to keep if possible. Everyone else is on the table although I certainly would prefer to use other intl guys vs Liranzo and Sosa. Using some kind of combo of Kjerstad, Stowers, Norby, Fabian, any of the veteran OFers/OHearn/Mounty and any of the draft picks from last year are amongst the group of guys I would be looking to move first.  Try to build a package(s) around that group of players and see what you can come up with.
    • Maybe John Means could masquerade as a healthy Chayce McDermott. https://www.milb.com/player/chayce-mcdermott-694646
    • I’m not sure trading for an impact starter is best use of resources. We still have six starters at the MLB level in Burnes, Bradish, GRod, Irvin, Kremer, and Suarez. Then Povich looks like he deserves a shot if needed.    Burnes, Bradish, GRod are the obvious playoff trio.    further injuries would change things, obviously, but at the moment I don’t see a clear need (and would have to pay handsomely for an upgrade). If someone would want Kremer as a part of the package, then maybe it makes sense. 
    • When Kremer comes back you have Burnes, Bradish, GRod, Kremer, Irvin Suarez in the bullpen.  Povich and McDermott at Norfolk. Absent further injury I don’t see Elias doing what it would probably take for Luzardo.  The relievers like Scott, Harvey, etc. will be cheaper.        
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...