Jump to content

MLB Lockout Thread


Can_of_corn

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Brooks The Great said:

I think MLB is going to have to give up on the international draft. Which would be a huge win for the O's.

Just my completely amateur opinion.

It would have been a win for the O's back when they refused to do any work to recruit and sign players.

It shouldn't be an advantage now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Oh no, the Union is trying to look out for kids.  How dare they.

They going to start making demands about High Schoolers, too?  I don't even care about the Int Draft but I see the owners moving more than the players lately.  Just make a deal.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ripken said:

They going to start making demands about High Schoolers, too?  I don't even care about the Int Draft but I see the owners moving more than the players lately.

The Union sold out High Schoolers years ago (Hard slotting and no ML contracts out of the draft).

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, waroriole said:

Which is why I don’t understand why the suddenly care about the international draft. 

It looks like the players from that background think it's worth fighting for.

I remember I asked Guthrie about his part when they made the changes to the Rule 4 draft.  He did reply and was polite but didn't give much of a real answer.  (Didn't Guthrie sign a ML contract out of school?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It looks like the players from that background think it's worth fighting for.

I remember I asked Guthrie about his part when they made the changes to the Rule 4 draft.  He did reply and was polite but didn't give much of a real answer.  (Didn't Guthrie sign a ML contract out of school?)

And yet many high profile Latino players have criticized an International Draft.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

?

I'm confused.

They are fighting to not have an International draft.

I don't know if fighting is the right word.  But they're criticizing the idea and predicting it to harm the development of players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, waroriole said:

It’s so close. Just get the thing done. 

Seeing how close they are it now seems likely there will be April baseball at least. So im relieved at this point. Might have to tack off 8 games or so from the schedule if it continues another week, which it could. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Oh no, the Union is trying to look out for kids.  How dare they.

I'll give the players the benefit of the doubt.  I'm sure they know a lot more about how this would impact the kids and their families.

I don't know if you are being serious anymore of just have become a caricature of yourself thinking that the union cares two cents about Latin kids and their families.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I don't know if you are being serious anymore of just have become a caricature of yourself thinking that the union cares two cents about Latin kids and their families.

I think that some individual union members do care.

Now how much pull they have with the Union I have no idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, waroriole said:

Which is why I don’t understand why the suddenly care about the international draft. 

They don't. They are using it as a negotiating tactic. Not even sure why the MLBPA has a say since these kids are not even on the 40-man. it's all just something the players are using to get more money for their constituents, the 40-man roster guys (but mainly how to get veteran players paid more).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tony-OH said:

I wonder why they think so. The academies are what improves these players so I don't see why they think they would suddenly stop funding them.  Maybe MLB should just take over the funding of these academies that teams would just provide the staff for. The team gets to know these players closely and give them a better understanding of who to draft.

But why would the Orioles fully staff a facility then?

I think the outcome, if the MLB took it over, would essentially be to lease these facilities like the O's just built and give multiple teams space in them. The O's would become a landlord in the DR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Maybe i moved to early on DC, but Bref  shows his contact status with a 2025 team option. SA and Soto are both overpays, but potentially really good options in a reduced role, another power arm would require them to move on from one of SA or Soto, unless youre looking to upgrade Akin or Bowman. Perez will be back.
    • DC is a FA. Soto and Dominguez are interesting decisions. SA is do 8M next year. Soto is under team control and likely looking at a salary in the 6.5M range.   In some ways, they sound like overpays for each. OTOH, they miss bats, can be high leverage guys and you don’t have long term commitments with either. As of now, I lean towards keeping both. I would like to re-sign DC depending on the contract. But I would still like to add another power arm. Now, that power arm could be an unproven close to ML ready prospect you get for Mullins or Mounty or OHearn. It doesn’t have to be someone you sign to a major deal. There may also be some ML relievers available for trade that makes sense. We see these teams all the time that just seemingly have power arm after power arm and we don’t have that. Elias has failed to address the pen properly imo and really, we don’t know if Felix will be the 2023 Felix going forward.  The pen has to be seen as a priority this year.    I want to see resources poured into the pitching staff and the improvement of the defense. 
    • Danny's back. I guess youre moving on from SA and Soto?
    • So what would you offer?, For me Max 2 years with mutual option. IF its any more than that keeping him might be tough.
    • The pen needs more help than just Bautista. So let’s say Santander is gone and the offense misses him…but what if the defense and pitching get better? People seem to have this narrow view of the sport that you can only win one way or with certain players. 
    • What's up peeps???  Lord I needed that win yesterday!!  Then the hubs and I (and about 200 other folks LOL) met Taters at a local restaurant establishment meet and greet last night.  And that was INSANE (in a good way).
    • Oddly, it’s the offense that I’m worried about for next year. Theoretically, we should go back to having a dominant pen with Bautista back. That helps shorten the game from the back of the pen down.  We’ve shown the ability under this regime to be able to piece together a rotation.  Subtracting Santa from this offense will be tough. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...