Jump to content

Minor League Season and Major League Players


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, wildcard said:

No.  Any player on the major league roster is part of the union and is locked out until the lockout is lifted.   I don't think they can even talk to the major league management  to be assigned to the minors much less play in minor league games.

So that's on the 40 man right? Like D.L. Hall?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB will allow former major league veteran’s that have signed minor league contracts to opt out of minor league spring training and games.  They are not current members of the MLBPA, but the are former members.  Concern was that forcing them to play would have made them look like scabs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, NCRaven said:

MLB will allow former major league veteran’s that have signed minor league contracts to opt out of minor league spring training and games.  They are not current members of the MLBPA, but the are former members.  Concern was that forcing them to play would have made them look like scabs.

Good of MLB to give them the choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Good of MLB to give them the choice.

Most veterans who sign minor league contracts do so with an implicit or explicitly stated invitation to Major League spring training, as a "non-roster invitee".   Since there may not be Major League spring training in February, this makes sense.

I suppose there might be a few exceptions to this, for example I think the first year Cesar Valdez was signed to a minor league contract with the Orioles, he wasn't even a non roster camp invitee..   And technically he had appeared in the majors before.  But those exceptions are pretty  rare

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ChosenOne21 said:

My understanding is that anyone on a team's 40 man roster is ineligible to play major or minor league baseball until the lockout is lifted. I believe everyone else can proceed as normal

They can't even work out at team facilities, and I don't think they are supposed to even communicate with the team (i.e, talk about what workouts they are doing with the coaching staff, etc).   Although I wonder if maybe in some situations where there is history and trust that some conversation may still be going on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SteveA said:

They can't even work out at team facilities, and I don't think they are supposed to even communicate with the team (i.e, talk about what workouts they are doing with the coaching staff, etc).   Although I wonder if maybe in some situations where there is history and trust that some conversation may still be going on.

Does this apply 100%?  I'd think that those that are dealing with injuries from the prior year or something could at least consult with team doctors and the like, but maybe even that isn't allowed right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/7/2022 at 1:57 AM, forphase1 said:

Does this apply 100%?  I'd think that those that are dealing with injuries from the prior year or something could at least consult with team doctors and the like, but maybe even that isn't allowed right now.

I would assume "team doctor" doesn't apply. From my knowledge, there really isn't a team doctor solely for one MLB team. Team doctor is generally a preferred doctor who is referred "patients" from the team. Also, for an injury, such as torn ligament of arm or leg, would most likely be under a specialist, who also would be paid by team in normal years but isn't exactly a team employee. Because they still operate as independent doctors, I would assume a player could still meet with them and either pay out of pocket or file a claim for reimbursement after. The player would not be able to work with physical therapists and trainers employed by the team.  This may be where the informal communication may come in. For example, Anthony Santander is posting a lot of his "rehab" on instagram. 

Edited by jarman86
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the part about not being seen as a scab, but if a veteran signed a minor league deal, then his career and ability to support is family hangs by a thread. Why would he choose to decline the opportunity to display his skills? I get there are exceptions, but if you're not in the union, you're not in the union. It certainly doesn't appear MLB cares that much about the minor leaguers when you consider how they're treated, but I guess you have to be there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Gentile4 said:

I get the part about not being seen as a scab, but if a veteran signed a minor league deal, then his career and ability to support is family hangs by a thread. Why would he choose to decline the opportunity to display his skills? I get there are exceptions, but if you're not in the union, you're not in the union. It certainly doesn't appear MLB cares that much about the minor leaguers when you consider how they're treated, but I guess you have to be there.

Maybe if the Union wasn't so quick to remove these type of fringe cases this wouldn't be an issue?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/6/2022 at 10:02 PM, NCRaven said:

MLB will allow former major league veteran’s that have signed minor league contracts to opt out of minor league spring training and games.  They are not current members of the MLBPA, but the are former members.  Concern was that forcing them to play would have made them look like scabs.

So if your a veteran who has lost his spot in the majors and is trying to make it back and get a major league contract this year, you don't want to go to a minor league camp.  You know, to give yourself a boost to getting a contract.  But at least you'll know when you don't get a major league contract after a shortened major league camp, no one will think you're a scab.  That will help pay the bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Posts

    • A poor man’s Mateo must be one broke MFer.
    • He said top prospects in the minor leagues. Kjerstad is in the major leagues.
    • Resigning Burnes is a long shot at this point. And getting 1.5 years of a viable 4/5 for the cost of a 40 fv player in a ball when we’ve had multiple starter injuries is good business to me. Not as our key move at the deadline, but for depth. If I could get civale for one of those guys then go get a #3 behind Grayson also, I’m all for it. Obviously too late now, but that also strengthens the pen if you can move Suarez back to a bp role. 
    • How is Mayo more expendable than Kjerstad? No wonder Bowden hasn't had a GM job for years.
    • Which contending teams do you feel are in a position to trade a “quality” reliever for a mostly-platoon 1B/DH? The overwhelming majority of contenders are looking to bolster their bullpen at this time of year — not weaken it. Whose bullpen is deep enough that they’d be willing to subtract from it during a pennant chase? As best I can tell, your options are basically Cleveland or…no one. If you want to sell O’Hearn for prospects in the offseason, I could get on board with that. In the middle of July, when you’re currently the best team in the American League? Moving a guy with a 124 wRC+ over the last 1.5 seasons seems foolhardy. I doubt there’s a lot of noise about trying to dump guys like Pete Alonso (125), Luis Arraez (124), Kyle Schwarber (124), Austin Riley (123), etc. — which is because their teams are focused on winning right now. Not on maximizing trade value. Not on forcing opportunities for prospects. WS contenders are not dumping high-end bats to gamble that some kids are ready.  Moving a guy to clear up a logjam and create space in-season to gamble on these kids’ high ceilings is an approach you might reasonably take with guys like Mateo, Urias, Hays, etc. Guys who are on the fringes of the roster, part-time players. But I don’t think it’s what you do with a guy you’ll slot into the 3 hole against the dozen or more good RH SPs in the AL that we may have to face come October. 
    • I remember that now. I actually watched the Tides when he was out there one day. That will give him more opportunities for sure as long as he isn’t a liability in the OF.
    • 1. Are the Orioles prepared to make a big move at the deadline? It seems like a (deal with the White Sox for) Garrett Crochet and Tommy Pham would be perfect for them. … Could catcher Samuel Basallo be the main piece in a deal for a controllable starter? — Brad K. The Orioles were proud that they didn’t trade any of their top-seven prospects when they landed Corbin Burnes from the Brewers in the offseason, and they’re continuing down that path in negotiations for starting pitchers now. They believe they don’t have to trade Basallo or Coby Mayo — ranked 12th and 17th, respectively, in Keith Law’s top 50 from early June — because they can instead deal from the depth of their strong farm system. Their approach is to hold onto all of their top prospects and deal from the middle of their farm system, which is better than the top of most teams’ systems.   That being said, a trade for Crochet would probably have to start with Basallo or Mayo, which could mean the Orioles pivot to a lesser starter, perhaps pursuing a reunion with Jack Flaherty of the Tigers or trying to land Luis Severino from the Mets.     2. Do you think Cal Quantrill would be a good fit for the Orioles? — Charles W. Yes, I think Quantrill would be a solid pickup for the back of their rotation. He wouldn’t be at the top of my target list — with pitchers such as Crochet, Flaherty, Severino, or any of the Blue Jays’ starters — but I put him in the category of Erick Fedde of the White Sox as a solid rotation depth play. Quantrill, 29, is under team control through 2025.   8. Crochet has already pitched more innings (101 1/3) this season than he had in his entire career. If a contending team acquires him, how will they manage his workload for the rest of 2024? — Robert S. That’s a great question, Robert. I asked two NL GMs who had interest in Crochet the same question and they both answered that if they were able to acquire him, which both believed would be difficult based on the return the White Sox would need to move him, they likely would use him as a reliever for the second half of the season, then stretch him back out at the end of September to give him a chance to start in the postseason.   27. Everyone asks about the biggest name to be traded, but who will be the biggest prospect to be traded? — Cameron Bortolazzo That’s a phenomenal question, Cameron. I’ll go with Coby Mayo, who as I said earlier, the Orioles are not looking to trade. But he is the most expendable of all their top prospects in the minor leagues and has the talent to be the headliner in a trade for a pitcher like Garrett Crochet.     This from his latest The Athletic piece, which I can’t get a link for.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...