Jump to content

Drew Rom 2022


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Pickles said:

If you're going to put a number on it I probably think it's higher than your number but solid in this relative sense would still be a pretty low number.  I certainly don't think he has an above 50% chance of making it as a ML starter.

I guess, my point, is my evaluation of him hasn't been altered all that much this year.  He hasn't had a breakout season, but again, he hasn't imo "pitched himself off" of being considered a prospect.

It also kinda depends on how you define "making it as a ML starter".

He has a solid chance to make it in the way that Spenser Watkins has made it. And that would be an excellent outcome for a 4th round pick!

He has maybe a 5 percent chance of making 100 career MLB starts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

It also kinda depends on how you define "making it as a ML starter".

He has a solid chance to make it in the way that Spenser Watkins has made it. And that would be an excellent outcome for a 4th round pick!

He has maybe a 5 percent chance of making 100 career MLB starts.

This is all true as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

How are you defining solid?  I’d say his chances are 5% at best.

Well, he’s an Orioles pitching prospect, so that means 5% chance of being a solid starter is a top prospect for us.   

What were the odds for Lowther, Baumann, Zimmermann, Akin, Kremer, Bradish?  What were the odds for John Means?  David Hess?  Tyler Wilson, Mike Wright?

Honestly I’m not sure where Rom falls on this spectrum.   I was pretty bullish on him going into the year.   I feel like he hasn’t taken the step forward I’d hoped for, but he hasn’t taken a big step backwards either.  He did miss a couple of weeks for unexplained reasons (COVID?  A minor injury?).   I could see him having 3-4 sharp outings in a row and being right where you’d want him to be.   Or, not.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Pickles said:

If you're going to put a number on it I probably think it's higher than your number but solid in this relative sense would still be a pretty low number.  I certainly don't think he has an above 50% chance of making it as a ML starter.

I guess, my point, is my evaluation of him hasn't been altered all that much this year.  He hasn't had a breakout season, but again, he hasn't imo "pitched himself off" of being considered a prospect.

For me, and just for now, he's taken a step backwards this year. 

Now, I could definitely be wrong. This could be SSS performance, caused by some basic ailment or developmental step he's focused on, and that disappears soon. I'm not saying that's impossible.

But going into this year, he was fringy as a prospect in my eyes basically because of his velo. I think Tony's write-ups on him were bullish, and totally respect that given his history with Zach Davies. I just think it's very hard to make that leap into something like a John Means without your profile really maximizing its potential, and he hasn't done that yet this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

For me, and just for now, he's taken a step backwards this year. 

Now, I could definitely be wrong. This could be SSS performance, caused by some basic ailment or developmental step he's focused on, and that disappears soon. I'm not saying that's impossible.

But going into this year, he was fringy as a prospect in my eyes basically because of his velo. I think Tony's write-ups on him were bullish, and totally respect that given his history with Zach Davies. I just think it's very hard to make that leap into something like a John Means without your profile really maximizing its potential, and he hasn't done that yet this year.

Well if the issue is velo, and presumably missing bats, then aren't you heartened by the 11 k/9 rate?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Pickles said:

Well if the issue is velo, and presumably missing bats, then aren't you heartened by the 11 k/9 rate?

A little? 

I'm pretty convinced that this development team is nearly maximizing the ability to miss bats. I'm still more interested in the profile.

But, to your point, this development team seems to give a wider range of profiles a believable pathway to success at higher levels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

A little? 

I'm pretty convinced that this development team is nearly maximizing the ability to miss bats. I'm still more interested in the profile.

But, to your point, this development team seems to give a wider range of profiles a believable pathway to success at higher levels.

I worry about is that high K rate is what is producing the high BB rate- meaning he's chasing Ks at the expense of efficiency and strike throwing- and so it is a bit illusory.  

We'll see as he keeps moving up the ladder.  But that's kind of my point: That was my position three months ago and not much has changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the in game box after the 5 shutout at Somerset and was almost back in hype mode.

His draft year I believe he was near the Top 10 bonuses given to high school arms, and as a LHP I hope it helps the raw play.

Maybe this year is consolidation and not another step forward, but with Kjerstad having made it to the first stepping stone, Rom's second half is high up on the list of things I'm not sure about to watch unfold.

Here's how his pedigree compares with the line of lefty hits and misses:

Lowther NCAA 2-74, $800k

Zimmermann NCAA 5-140, $10,000    (today I learned Zimm was a We Went Overslot on someone else offset)

Akin NCAA 2-54, $1.2mm

Means, NCAA 11-331, no bonus given on B-Ref 11th round page for that draft year

Rom, High School, 4-115, $600k

The old regime seemed to have pretty good taste in high school pitchers.    Last night the pregame show had a feature on Mancini's minor league years (had some video of the 21-year-old Ironbird back in the day I'd never seen), and a highlight of it was Trey and Yaz leading the Baysox to their Eastern League championship.    Hoping Rom can make good use of the first half flush and get another crack at it this year.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

7/0 K/BB in five shutout innings on the road maybe his best game of the year.

https://www.milb.com/gameday/baysox-vs-flying-squirrels/2022/07/23/672406#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=box,game=672406

Baysox continue to enjoy split-season reset and postseason possibilities for Rom-Cowser-Kjerstad.    I hope their Grayson ringer isn't more than another few weeks away.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there's one thing I've learned from watching baseball seriously for over 50 years, it's that minor league performance isn't always a good predictor. Means' minor league numbers weren't all that great, certainly no better than Rom's. Rom has 110 innings at AA and been relatively successful. Why wait to move him to Norfolk? Let's see what we have. I don't understand the reluctance to move guys along. Cal, Eddie, and Brooks had really nice minor league careers, but their minor league numbers certainly didn't scream out HOF. They were all up at 21 for their ML debuts. If it's about service time with a guy like Rom, then I can only shake my head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Gentile4 said:

If there's one thing I've learned from watching baseball seriously for over 50 years, it's that minor league performance isn't always a good predictor. Means' minor league numbers weren't all that great, certainly no better than Rom's. Rom has 110 innings at AA and been relatively successful. Why wait to move him to Norfolk? Let's see what we have. I don't understand the reluctance to move guys along. Cal, Eddie, and Brooks had really nice minor league careers, but their minor league numbers certainly didn't scream out HOF. They were all up at 21 for their ML debuts. If it's about service time with a guy like Rom, then I can only shake my head.

It’s not at all about service time with a guy like Rom.   He may get promoted but it’s not like he’s set the world on fire this year or has overwhelming stuff.   I’d call his season a mixed bag and a mild disappointment so far considering how strongly he finished last season.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

It’s not at all about service time with a guy like Rom.   He may get promoted but it’s not like he’s set the world on fire this year or has overwhelming stuff.   I’d call his season a mixed bag and a mild disappointment so far considering how strongly he finished last season.  

Agree about the service time; I just hope the FO isn't thinking about that. I'm a little more encouraged than you are about his progress, but when you look at the pitching across the Eastern League, he's certainly among the top pitchers. Maybe not top 10, but he'll be 23 next season, and I just don't see the point of slow rolling all these top prospects. He's got 110 innings at AA, and if he moves soon, he could get 40-45 at Norfolk in 2022 and start there next season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Gentile4 said:

Agree about the service time; I just hope the FO isn't thinking about that. I'm a little more encouraged than you are about his progress, but when you look at the pitching across the Eastern League, he's certainly among the top pitchers. Maybe not top 10, but he'll be 23 next season, and I just don't see the point of slow rolling all these top prospects. He's got 110 innings at AA, and if he moves soon, he could get 40-45 at Norfolk in 2022 and start there next season. 

I think he has a decent chance of getting promoted.  He’s been kind of inconsistent and it would be nice to see him string together 2-3 good outings in a row.   He’s only thrown three games all year where he pitched at least 5 innings and allowed 0 or 1 runs.  Last year he did that 12 times, including 6 out of 7 starts immediately before he was promoted.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • You would think the Rays are going to have a selloff if they aren't playoff team at the deadline.  They stretched their budget this year, and are not going to lose money to miss the playoffs by 2 games. 
    • Trading HK and Norby is leftovers but 4 non-top 100 prospects gets Gausman.  Every market is different, but sounds like your just circling wagons around a cliche.
    • I think you’re having trouble getting an answer because you’re making a comparison that isn’t particularly apt. Grayson is 24 years old. Shōta turns 31 in a couple months, and he’s got 1200+ professional innings on his arm (on top of a full college career). You also have two years of pre-arb left with Grayson, followed by three years of arbitration. Something like 5/$35M. Assuming Shōta’s 2025 option gets exercised (which should be the hope, because it would mean he’s been healthy and pitching like the “ace” that you’re calling him), you’re looking at something in the realm of 4/$70M. So one fewer year at twice the cost. They're not particularly comparable. You’re talking about a kid who has yet to even enter his prime and a veteran who is starting to approach the end of his. The respective returns for the two would presumably be pretty different — and that’s without even addressing the issue that you’d very likely be buying Shōta at the absolute peak of his value right now.
    • I actual prefer a one o’clock game Sunday. We get the extra rest. The Yankees will be playing and then hopping in their beds around 2 AM.
    • What about the Rays? I know it’s hard to trade in division. They need offense and you could kill 2 birds with one stone. Zach Efflin and Jason Adam would solve both starter and bullpen issues. Rays may be extra incentivized to get rid of Efflin contract.
    • Let’s be clear. He’s pitching like an ace THIS YEAR. this is his first year in mlb and he was considered a back end starter when he was signed.  No one rational would say a 2.5 month performance in your first year in MLB requires the number one prospect in baseball PLUS MORE! Respectfully it’s lunacy.
    • I’m not saying we can’t trade for Scott. Or that we shouldn’t trade for someone. More that we basically already have one reliever we don’t have to trade for. But a guy who will likely have a relatively high whip due to command issues but have a well above average k rate… I also just don’t love rentals in general. Hit or miss as to whether they perform well anyway (hey jack flaherty) and then it’s gone. If you don’t win that year it’s all for nothing. For the right cost I’m okay with it, but I don’t want to give up a major prospect for a rental unless it’s the piece that puts us over the top 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...