Jump to content

Connor Norby 2022


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, SilverRocket said:

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-connor-norby-swing-adjustment-rise-norfolk-20220921-xchek63x2zg4xbqdhw7mwxm44y-story.html

Between this, and Cowser and Henderson talking about how they had to go back to being themselves, I wonder how much of the new analytics-based development is still taking effect. The swing decisions of the rookies have generally been pretty good at least.

My impression from a bunch of interviews is that the O's aren't prescriptive about changes. Instead, they're giving the players a ton of data/information and letting them work through what works best for them.

I'm sure it's not 100% either way (prescriptive vs. player choice), but those quotes align pretty well with a player understanding what the O's are looking for (power in this case) and then figuring out the best way to get there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, owknows said:

He has an interesting swing.

Not the shape of it... just the sense that his bat goes slowly through the zone... and he's gently pushing the ball into play.

His power says it ain't so... but I've seen several of his HR swings...  and am always left with the same impression.

I actually get this same exact feeling when I watch Urias bat. Not certain on the actual metrics, but just watching on TV it always looks slow, or at least he doesn't appear to exert the same energy into his swing as the others. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Maybe it is just me, from the highlight just posted he looks bigger than I remembered. Could he have filled out some? Actually looks a little big for 2B. I could see him giving Mountcastle some competition

 

I saw him in person in Bowie, I think that the clip is a little misleading and might be 'first-game can't find a uniform that fits exactly' kind of thing. Kind of like Gunnar Henderson's batting helmets. I don't think he's as thick in person as that clip seems to show. But maybe, I haven't seen him play in person in months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SilverRocket said:

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-connor-norby-swing-adjustment-rise-norfolk-20220921-xchek63x2zg4xbqdhw7mwxm44y-story.html

Between this, and Cowser and Henderson talking about how they had to go back to being themselves, I wonder how much of the new analytics-based development is still taking effect. The swing decisions of the rookies have generally been pretty good at least.

I think the Orioles give them information and ideas, and then let them work on it. They're in the minor leagues to develop, and that means experimenting. Gunnar is a better version of himself, he isn't the same hitter as his first MilB season, and Cowser seems to have increased his power production

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, emmett16 said:

Wow #27.  A bunch of young guys are going to be close to 30 HR this year (Norby, Henderson, Stowers, & Westburg). 

Ever since the Bowie promotion he has been on fire. Seems like he has leapfrogged Hall, Mayo, and maybe Stowers. Tony's power ranking has him at #9 but I feel like he has to be higher right now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I went back to look at a couple of pre-season scouting reports on Norby.   Tony had him at 40/45 raw power, 35/45 game power.  Eric Longenhagen also had him at 40/45 raw power, but 30/45 game power.  Tony noted that Norby had “occasional pop.”  Longenhagen described it as “enough sneaky pop to get to double digit home runs annually.”

So here he is, sitting on 27 homers.  Keep in mind that he got hit in the face by a pitch on May 10, didn’t play again until May 28 and it took him a while to get his bearings when he returned.  He didn’t hit another homer until June 11.  22 of his 27 homers have been on or after that date.  

I’ll be interested to see the power grades this offseason, but I have a feeling they’re not topping out at 45.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I went back to look at a couple of pre-season scouting reports on Norby.   Tony had him at 40/45 raw power, 35/45 game power.  Eric Longenhagen also had him at 40/45 raw power, but 30/45 game power.  Tony noted that Norby had “occasional pop.”  Longenhagen described it as “enough sneaky pop to get to double digit home runs annually.”

So here he is, sitting on 27 homers.  Keep in mind that he got hit in the face by a pitch on May 10, didn’t play again until May 28 and it took him a while to get his bearings when he returned.  He didn’t hit another homer until June 11.  22 of his 27 homers have been on or after that date.  

I’ll be interested to see the power grades this offseason, but I have a feeling they’re not topping out at 45.   
 

The question is where does he project to play in the majors.   He doesn't play 2B over Ortiz, Westburg and Urias.     His best tool is bats.

Maybe he fits at DH when the O's move Santander at the deadline.

 

Edited by wildcard
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

The question is where does he project to play in the majors.   He doesn't play 2B over Ortiz, Westburg and Urias.     His best tool is bats.

Maybe he fits at DH when the O's move Santander at the deadline.

 

I think Norby absolutely plays 2B over Urias.

And of the 4 players you mentioned here some of them will have to be dealt.

I think some trading of middle infielders / third basemen for pitching / 1B / DH is inevitable.

In the not-too-distant future.
 

More good players than places to play them. And if I had to guess, Norby would be less likely to be dealt than most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, owknows said:

I think Norby absolutely plays 2B over Urias.

And of the 4 players you mentioned here some of them will have to be dealt.

I think some trading of middle infielders / third basemen for pitching / 1B / DH is inevitable.

In the not-too-distant future.
 

More good players than places to play them. And if I had to guess, Norby would be less likely to be dealt than most.

I have to admit that I have not seen Norby play much.  So I could be wrong but what I have read says he does not have the arm or the range to beat out Ortiz, Westburg or Urias at 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

The question is where does he project to play in the majors.   He doesn't play 2B over Ortiz, Westburg and Urias.     His best tool is bats.

Maybe he fits at DH when the O's move Santander at the deadline.

 

I'm guessing one or two of Ortiz, Westburg, Urias, and Santander are traded in the off season. If Norby and Ortiz are still flying under the radar (are they?) that would mean Westburg probably has more trade value than any of our other infielders not named Gunnar. Henderson at 3rd, Ortiz at SS, and Norby at 2nd sure makes a lot of sense to me. Keep Urias and/or Vavra as utility and trade the leftovers for pitching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, wildcard said:

I have to admit that I have not seen Norby play much.  So I could be wrong but what I have read says he does not have the arm or the range to beat out Ortiz, Westburg or Urias at 2B.

Arm is a little less of a concern with the shift being banned. With his bat we need to find a position for him if it's not 2B. I don't think Urias blocks any of these guys but that still leaves 3 guys for two positions. Maybe one position if we keep Mateo at SS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

I went back to look at a couple of pre-season scouting reports on Norby.   Tony had him at 40/45 raw power, 35/45 game power.  Eric Longenhagen also had him at 40/45 raw power, but 30/45 game power.  Tony noted that Norby had “occasional pop.”  Longenhagen described it as “enough sneaky pop to get to double digit home runs annually.”

So here he is, sitting on 27 homers.  Keep in mind that he got hit in the face by a pitch on May 10, didn’t play again until May 28 and it took him a while to get his bearings when he returned.  He didn’t hit another homer until June 11.  22 of his 27 homers have been on or after that date.  

I’ll be interested to see the power grades this offseason, but I have a feeling they’re not topping out at 45.   
 

Can I use the excuse that he was new draft pick and that's what the all the scouting reports said? ;)

Obviously Norby has grown into his power and watching the distance on his home runs and frequency is going to up his power ratings for sure.

What I really want to know is why are so many hitters struggling at Aberdeen vs at higher levels. I know Aberdeen itself is a tough park to hit in since the power alleys are cavernous and maybe the lighting is not great, but why were guys like Norby, Cowser, Henderson and Haskin all better at Bowie? 

Either way, Norby has certainly put himself on the map as a top prospect in the organization. The swing is compact and quick and he's generating real power. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • No, as it appears to be a group think decision, where all have some input.  In the end it really doesn't matter if it's all Elias, Sigbot or Hyde or some combination of the 3, Hyde is the one who defends it to the media/fans, and he's the one who gets paid to take the critism/blame.  Either way, starting Slater is the move that WHOEVER make the decisions appears to love, so that's what I expect to see, even if it doesn't make sense based on this years performances.
    • I’m guessing he may be bulk reliever later in game. Have to see. 
    • You think Hyde alone makes the decision?
    • Gil has been terrible in his last 2 starts, he has  given up 10 earned runs in 11 innings
    • It's a meaningless game so hard to read anything into it. It could also be more of an "opener" gambit so that Davidson can be brought in with favorable matchups. For a team that believes so strongly in matchups, I don't know why we don't use the opener more often, especially when it has been effective against us. 
    • Both are deserving. That’s not the point. How they construct the pen in ‘25 may be different. None of the guys you mentioned have been pen guys, although McDermott probably should be. Young and Rogers are more of a starter repertoire. Armbruster and others, like Tony said in another thread, should be pen arms. You need flexible and effective arms to move up and down, while they gain experience. We need some guys with some swing and miss stuff. Adding Bautista back into the back end moves everyone down a notch, but some of the guys we have now will likely have to move on for the purposes of flexibility. There is always some natural turnover, and for good reason. 
    • And?  If they were buying his career stats, then they were fooled by a bait and switch.  Yeah, career numbers are good, but they don't reflect the reality of this year.  .541 OPS against LHP.  Elias/Hyde has a tendency to bring in guys who might have had good career numbers, but who are not playing at that level in the current year, but then letting them play like they are performing at career levels.  Slaters numbers this year don't reflect that he should be getting starts versus LHP over Cowser, even with the struggles Cowser has had.  That said, I fully expect to see Slater starting as that's the move Hyde will love, and will then speak eloquently at how great Slater is hitting against LHP this year, even though that's clearly a lie.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...