Jump to content

2022 Ongoing Lineup Thread


OsFanSinceThe80s

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, dzorange said:

I wouldn't be surprised to see Aguilar get a lot of ABs on the road. O's need some punch in their lineup, it's probably not worth trotting him out there at Camden too often.

I expect Stowers to get back in the lineup more regularly on this homestand. I'm not surprised that he's not out there tonight, but I am surprised that Vavra is.

Why would you not be surprised to see Aguilar in there over Stowers vs a RHP? Stowers is at least as likely as Aguilar is to add punch to the lineup.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Odor entrenched at 2B, I'm just glad when Vavra or Stowers can get into a game.  I'm enjoying every game this year and still looking forward to seeing Westburg, Vavra, Urias, Mateo, and even Ortiz competing for jobs in spring training next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, deward said:

Why would you not be surprised to see Aguilar in there over Stowers vs a RHP? Stowers is at least as likely as Aguilar is to add punch to the lineup.

Because Stowers offers more value at Camden. It's also clear that Stowers is not going to be an every day player for the rest of this season.

I also think it's a stretch to say that Stowers, who has 1 HR in 34 PAs in his career is at least as likely to add punch as Aguilar, who has 108 HRs in 2500 career PAs.

I'd rather have Stowers out there, mostly because it takes Santander off the field defensively and I want to see what he can do, but there's a reason the O's signed Aguilar and he's going to get ABs.

Edited by dzorange
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, dzorange said:

Because Stowers offers more value at Camden. It's also clear that Stowers is not going to be an every day player for the rest of this season.

I also think it's a stretch to say that Stowers, who has 1 HR in 34 PAs in his career is at least as likely to add punch as Aguilar, who has 108 HRs in 2500 career PAs.

I'd rather have Stowers out there, mostly because it takes Santander off the field defensively and I want to see what he can do, but there's a reason the O's signed Aguilar and he's going to get ABs.

Based on this season, it's not a stretch at all. Aguilar has been bad, and he's a bad-body guy on the wrong side of 30. Maybe he picks it up again, maybe he's on the downslope. Stowers is 34 PA into his career, I'm pretty sure he's likely to improve. I'd much rather see Stowers in there against any RHP and let Aguilar primarily serve as PH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Aguilar is our 2022 Delmon Young. He’s not the pure hitter Delmon was, but he’s a seasoned vet that’s been in big moments. .800 Career OPS vs LHP. Plus he gives Mountcastle a mental break. Sometimes guys just need to get away from the Marlins. 

Or maybe our 2012 Wilson Betemit?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, MijiT88 said:

I cant believe Odor still makes the lineup today. I thought we would get a day or two without him now but somehow he is stuck on 2b forever

I'm more and more convinced of the defensive advantage Odor offers. He made the play for the final out last night against Cleveland look easy, but it wasn't. Offensively, he seems to be adjusting his swing to settle for more singles than going all-out for homers all the time.

Meanwhile, Vavra has looked awful while going 1 for 21 with 10 Ks and just 1 BB after a good game on Aug. 11th and so is an improvement neither in the field or at the plate. Now is not the time to experiment further. The dogfight has begun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Aguilar is our 2022 Delmon Young. He’s not the pure hitter Delmon was, but he’s a seasoned vet that’s been in big moments. .800 Career OPS vs LHP. Plus he gives Mountcastle a mental break. Sometimes guys just need to get away from the Marlins. 

Last night he looked more like our 2013 Mike Morse, who was quite a disappointment, although he did move on to a decent year next season with the Giants.

Edited by LA2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • OP is asking about next year as well as this one. I think the point is we can get a guy who will help us now and next year. We did expect to lose Bradish but not him and Means and Wells all at the same time. Right now we would be going into next year with Grayson as our only dependable guy. Won't be much margin for error without another Burnes type. 
    • Something to keep in mind in the offseason is that the starting pitcher FA market doesn’t look that great in terms of pitchers we would sign or even want to sign. On top of that, you have several guys who only become FA if they opt out and if they opt out, it’s likely because they didn’t have a great season. Combine that with the idea that our only 2 internal rotation candidates are Povich and McDermott, both of whom have exhibited a lot of issues with command and control and it certainly is a shaky long term outlook for the rotation. Position player wise, we will (in theory) lose Santander and McCann. Hays and Mullins are likely gone. Not going to have both Mateo and Urias but certainly could bring back one. As of now, OHearn definitely has his option picked up. If it were up to me, Mounty would be traded. 2 years left of control, likely to be coming off a very solid season and we have players behind him. He could help fetch us some pitching. My expectation is at least 2 of Mounty, OHearn and Santander will be back. How so many of these guys and our prospects end the year will determine how we attack the offseason. But for the deadline, I think obtaining a starter that can be here long term is something the team should look at.     You have several options in Miami and potentially a guy like Detmers.    A Detmers/Estevez package is something I would be looking into.  Same thing with Nardi and one of the Marlins starters, like a Braxton Garrett for example. For me, the key here is that you need to upgrade the pen. I think if you make the pen really good and you have Burnes and GRod, that may be enough.    In not trading our top 3 prospects. I think all play big roles in 2025, although Basallo may not play a role until the season is well underway, But I would trade Kjerstad and anyone else while hoping to keep certain guys although they wouldn’t be deal breakers.  
    • And Fangraphs has the Yankees 68% to 31% to win the division.
    • Would a package including Kjerstad and Norby (possibly Stowers too) be able to get us Sonny Gray and Helsley? STL has to at some point come to a conclusion that they don't have enough to legit compete for a World Series this year or the next few projectable years. This would give them an infusion of young talent and get Gray off of their books. That's 3 young controllable starting position players for their #1 and closer. I'm not sure what the value proposition is there. But this is the kind of trade that I would be looking to make and I think it helps both ball clubs.
    • Pitching injuries are happening to a crazy degree all over the sport. We still have our #1 starter who is the best starter that we have had in decades and a very talented #2/3. All is not lost.
    • Just another argument for roboumps
    • There will be FAs (none admittedly as good as Burnes) that we can sign. We have a ridiculously low payroll and aren't paying anyone.  We are not going to maintain excellence long term by only using the draft and trades to meaningfully add talent. We are going to have to use the free agent market (wisely) too.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...