Jump to content

Remaining Schedule


WarehouseChatter

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, WarehouseChatter said:

17 of our next 22 at home; 20 of our final 32 at home.  I don’t think it’s out of the question that we could get to 88 wins which “should” get us a wildcard spot.  My thinking:

Oakland - win 2/3

Toronto - win 3/4

Boston - win 2/3

@ Washington - win 2/2

@ Toronto - win 1/3

Detroit - win 2/3

Houston - win 2/4

@ Boston - win 2/4

@ NY - win 1/3

Toronto - win 2/3

remainder - 19-13

Overall - 88-74

Thoughts?

So far, we’re keeping pace!  😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We might need to watch out for the White Sox again.   Tony LaRussa is out indefinitely while looking into a health issue, and they have gone 3-1 since he left.   With that albatross no longer around their necks, they could get hot and get back into the wild card race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boston is a big concern to me.  Not worried about them snatching a wild card spot, but they are going to be a very tough opponent down the stretch.  Their lineup is just loaded and it is almost as if they have just now realized that they should be much better than their record.  Thankfully they play Tampa 6 times, NY 6 times, and Toronto 3 times so they aren't just going to be a problem for us.  But our 7 games against them could be a real challenge for us.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

We lose the doubleheader tomorrow, the race is effectively over.  Making up 4.5 games having only 8 remaining games with the Blue Jays would be extremely difficult. 

Absolutely need at least a split w  the Blue Jays tomorrow and in the series with them.  Tomorrow the Jays throw Manoah and Gausman.  The O's have done surprisingly good against both I believe.

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

God, I hope Hyde's lineups are bearable tomorrow 

I don’t get the usage of Adley this past series with the doubleheader tomorrow. Catcher’s won-loss record isn’t a stat that is always reliable, but the Orioles are a better team when Adley catches.

So why did Adley only start one game against A’s instead of two as catcher. We know Adley is only catching one game tomorrow the Blue Jays and there’s an off day this Thursday.

Maybe Adley is banged up, but outside of normal rest he should be playing catcher as often as possible. The team plays worse when Chirinos is catching even if Adley is in the lineup as a DH.

I understand not wanting to wear out Adley, but it’s the last month of the season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

It's Gausman and Berrios, my bad.  Berrios has been the weak link in their rotation for the Jays.  Much better matchup.

Kevin will hopefully be overthinking it today which he has had a tendency towards..a loud Camden Yards hopefully will bring back personal past traumas lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, tntoriole said:

We lose the doubleheader tomorrow, the race is effectively over.  Making up 4.5 games having only 8 remaining games with the Blue Jays would be extremely difficult. 

These are HUGE games no doubt. But there are 25 games remaining after this series. Every game going forward is equally important. If we were to take 3 out 4 or even get the 4 game sweep, it doesn't mean much in the grand scheme. Gotta play well in those last 25 or it won't matter. Take it day by day... gonna be a fun month of baseball!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Gunnar’s fWAR is 4.7. It was 4.7 for all of 2023. Hes a top 3 player in the game right now.
    • Irvin, Kremer, and maybe Povich are all capable of Game 3. You’re overstating what is necessary for postseason success. It doesn’t have to be a fool proof team. This offense is capable of carrying a league average #3 SP. 
    • Here are some June numbers as of the day off: Hays 1.227 OPS Santander 1.074, 12 R, 8 HR 14 RBI Henderson 1.021, 14 R O’Hearn .906 Urias .837 Rutschman .809, 4 HR 16 RBI Westburg.765 Mountcastle .743, 10 R, 5 HR, 12 RBI Cowser .697 Stowers .588 Mullins .587 Mateo .520 Overall, the team has an .832 OPS in June and is averaging 5.56 runs per game, while allowing 2.88 runs per game.   That’ll work.
    • His sprint speed is in the 88th percentile.
    • Was he favoring his right elbow, as well?
    • I can't say what Elias will do. Because I have no way of knowing that. I have no inside knowledge. I'm just a fan like everybody else. What I can and will say is that he should be exploring every way to meaningful upgrade the roster where it is weakest, which is the pitching staff. I understand not wanting to trade Holliday (and he should not IMO). Holliday's value, while still very high, is probably not as high it was before the season started. But as far as the other two are concerned. An argument can be made that they are redundant pieces. One of them can be made expendable through a Santander (very affordable) extension.  Now, what I will say, is that I don't think that it is the best strategy long term to hoard position player prospects (especially those who are redundant no matter how talented) at the sake of not having comparable talent on the pitching side. That has us with a prime aged Kjerstad wasting a season at AAA (while destroying the baseball) because there is literally no place to play him. I see it as taking on unnecessary risks to replace Santander and/or O'Hearn/Mountcastle when they are affordable and productive Major League players. Yes it is possible all of our prospects out hit/out produce them. But it is also possible that all do not. Replacing them all may lead to an unforced error in betting on the future. IMO it doesn't have to be a binary choice of either/or with productive vets vs uber talented young prospects. We can have our cake and eat it to by taking a both/and approach. We will still have TWO uber talented prospects next year in Holliday and one of Mayo/Basallo while having Santander (extended) AND O'Hearn (on a team option at a very affordable contract) AND a difference making pitcher (to help soften the blow/loss of Bradish). Yes this requires a little spending (which I acknowledge some posters hate the idea of that). But again it comes down to expectations and the bar that the org sets. If we want to be the next Astros (multi-World Series winners) it's not going to solely be about our front office and scouting talent, and trying to always be the smartest guys in the room. Sometimes the ownership has to do their part and invest in the known quotient/reliable talent that can keep your odds as high as possible because you can go toe-to-toe/bullet-for-bullet with anyone. 
    • Do players really have that much control of direction? I definitely think there's a major variance factor in that. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...