Jump to content

What 3 moves would you make this off season (that are realistic)?


DocJJ

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Westburg, Ortiz, and Henderson, can play multiple positions.  Norby is probably the one who doesn’t fit.   All roads lead to Henderson.  The future homes of Urías, Mateo, Ortiz, and Westburg all depend on that decision.

Plus Mayo, who perhaps is a bigger piece than any of those other infielders.

There's a lot of room between going full Gunnar (1st or 2nd best Orioles Bat by yearend), and just getting into the Top Nine where your Org should consider if you belong on a fall roster like Francisco Alvarez, Will Brennan and Miguel Vargas are/were.

If Kjerstad and Mayo are who Elias thought they were, they probably should challenge for those roles in 10-11 months.

End of 2023 configurations with all Elias' hand-picked guys get tough for current Orioles to crack.     I hope sometime next September for a lineup like..

LF Cowser, SS Gunnar, 3B Mayo, C Adley, DH Kjerstad, CF Mullins, 1B Mountcastle, RF Santander, 2B JW/RU/JO/CN/JM/TV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I am limited to only 3 transactions/moves to better the team for 2023 then I would do the following (in no particular order, but still budget conscious on the future😞

1. Sign Tucker Barnhardt to back up Adley, can hit decently and is of course left handed hitter.

2. Sign Anthony Rizzo to a lofty 1 yr deal with a 2nd yr option. With the removal of the shift and our short porch in RF, i think he might hit closer to .240 but have same power numbers.

3. Sign Koudai Senga to a 4 or 5 yr contract with maybe the intent to really make noise in 2024 and have a Japanese player on the team that could assist with the chances to enter the Ohtani sweepstakes.

By signing Rizzo to a 1 yr deal you would have 1B open for Adley on some days for Ohtani to DH and work out a schedule for pitching days or off days. You could then pencil in Mountcastle for 1st or a converted 3B/OF to 1st that will be blocked. This could be the true middle of the order bat for our contending 2024-2027 teams. It might take 50 million for him, but if could feasible to maintain that salary on a short term 4 yr deal before the big years hit for Adley, Gunnar and other extensions.

Ideally i would add another pitcher as well and I would also look to extend Adley and Gunnar to decent extensions like others have noted that would buy out at least 2 years each of free agency, but highlighted my first 3 above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My preferred two-step move is one that’s been mentioned frequently — namely, trading mostly position players for a younger quality SP (P. Lopez, T. Skubal, C. Javier, etc.) and then signing someone like Josh Bell or Anthony Rizzo to give instant pop in the middle of the lineup. 

One thing I haven’t seen a lot is addressing the bullpen. Which I understand, because there’s definitely a realistic scenario in which they could field a very strong bullpen just from internal candidates — the Bautista, Perez, Tate core plus a few from a group of Baker, Akin, Krehbiel, and the guys who don’t win rotation spots (potentially Wells, Voth, Bradish, Kremer, Hall, Baumann, etc). That would be a lot of talent to choose from, and it would be extremely cheap. 

With that said, I think they’re going to want to keep a number of those guys stretched out as starters, and I’m afraid I’m just not sold on Perez/Tate as the next Brach and O’Day. If they could bring in a guy like Rafael Montero (just one example, I’m sure there are others) on a reasonable deal, that would add another power arm to the bullpen. If they’re inclined to look at lefties — because Perez in particular is iffy, or just because they have a ton of viable righty options — I think guys like Matt Moore (pretty darn good as a reliever) or Andrew Chafin (great mustache, also a good pitcher) would be options. 

I know it’s not “cool” to spend on veteran relievers. But any of these would be relatively short deals, and we’re talking about a roster that realistically is not going to approach any sort of reasonable spending ceiling. They’ll have money to spend, and these are guys who could affect a pennant race if they help lock down the back end of the pen. Bullpens are about stockpiling quantity and quality, and adding such a player instantly creates more high-end depth. And worst case scenario, if the season goes upside down for us, these kinds of guys are always in demand at the deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, clapdiddy said:

So, I guess it's no big surprise, but Correa is opting out of his deal in Minnesota.

Any chance Elias goes after him and use some of the depth of middle infielders in the minors to acquire established pitching? 

Would a 4/140 deal make sense for him?

Ummm doubt that it would.. he was looking for 10 year 350 last year signing 3 year 104 deal he is opting out of

6 year minimum i would guess and near 200 mil

 

We can sign anybody up to 20+mil for 2023 and still be budget neutral as Chris Davis 23 mil comes off .. house money..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, e16bball said:

I know it’s not “cool” to spend on veteran relievers. But any of these would be relatively short deals, and we’re talking about a roster that realistically is not going to approach any sort of reasonable spending ceiling. They’ll have money to spend, and these are guys who could affect a pennant race if they help lock down the back end of the pen. Bullpens are about stockpiling quantity and quality, and adding such a player instantly creates more high-end depth. And worst case scenario, if the season goes upside down for us, these kinds of guys are always in demand at the deadline.

Totally agree. I don't fully trust Tate or Perez and we can't just assume plus-replacement level guys will fall to us, especially now that we won't have prime waiver position. Veteran relievers are a cheap way to get WPA in high leverage situations. The bullpen felt a little thin after we traded Jorge. Hard to go on a win streak when you're needing to get big outs from Baker and Krehbiel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Signing Verlander just makes so much sense, as it does for any team trying to win. Give him the big two year deal, while our payroll is dirt cheap. Then Wells can get pushed into a BP role. 
 

SP: Verlander, GR, Bradish, Kremer, Voth

Depth: Wells, Watkins, Means, Baumann, Hall

BP: Omar, Perez, Wells, Tate, Baker, Khreibel, Akin, Watkins

Depth: Vespi, Baumann, Zimmerman, Hall

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2022 at 10:50 AM, Jim'sKid26 said:

Ok. You have to explain why no Rizzo. Power hitting LH with GG defense at 1B. O's need a MoO bat. With Wallitimore a LH power bat is much preferred.

With regard to Stripling:

Stripling: ERA+ = 3.57, xFIP= 3.67, BABIP=.269, K/9 = 7.4, IP= 134.1, Age= will play all of 2023 at 33

Burnes: ERA+ = 3.05 , xFIP= 2.85, BABIP= .292, K/9 = 11.7, IP= 202, Age= 28

How do you consider these two pitchers interchangeable? Burnes >>>>Stripling

No Rizzo because I believe he’s going to start breaking down. We need the LH power bat but a younger pre arb guy.

I don’t think the pitchers are interchangeable just cost to acquire. Burns is going to cost and Stripling is just cash.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Riggodrill44 said:

If I could dream,Casses from Boston. That's the guy I would love to have. At least this type.

That’s the point though.  Is that pre Arb MLB level stud a real thing at a reasonable cost?  Boston will dump Hosmer before Casas.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. If we’re trying to win the division, which would take 100 games, then we have to come out the gates swinging from day 1. Of course you still hold GR, Westburg, and Cowser, down the first 15 days. 
 

2. I really like us to keep our wealth of prospects and spend on FA. Then see where we’re at deadline time next year. 
 

3.  That’s why I want Verlander, JD Martinez, and Jorge Lopez. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I don't think it's anything close to 90%.  As of June the brand recognition of the cereal was under 90%. If you have two pretty similar nicknames isn't it just common sense to go with the one that isn't the street name of a drug? And for the record all I was doing was giving a personal preference.  I never said anyone couldn't do whatever the heck they wanted.
    • This is the story, or part of the story, of the last two Orioles' seasons: trying to balance winning games and reaching the postseason (and, last year and and for a long time this year, a division title) with building for the future. However you balance those two, there is a risk of harming the team. The way the Orioles have been and are being built, relying on a bunch of young position players to blossom at around the same time, enhanced that risk. Sometimes these two objectives line up pretty well, after weakening the team for a short time, as they did with Westburg, Henderson and Rutschman, and to a lesser degree Cowser. Sometimes the objectives don't fit together very well, as has been the case with Holliday and Mayo. The possibility of that misfit was, and is, inherent in the way this team was built. Maybe the harm to the team's overall performance from playing the young guys could have been reduced by better coaching or more effective communication with the coaches, but there was really no way for this team to avoid the problem.
    • He's always looked calm and capable in his mlb at-bats. Let's the ball come to him, as they say. Am optimistic.
    • Position Players: 2023: 105 wRC+, 16.0 BsR, 54.9 Off, -26.3 Def, 23.8 WAR   2024: 113 wRC+, 1.2 BsR, 90.8 Off, -26.1 Def, 27.0 WAR   The 2023 batters had a clutch score of 8.39. That number is -1.35 this season. The 2023 batters had an xwOBA of .319 (15th). That number is .328 this season (6th). The RISP was also much better last year (as we all know). Not only did they hit for a much higher average (.287 versus .246 this year), but their ISO with RISP jumped up to .195 (it was .166 in all situations).    The defense is about as valuable as last year even though they seem much less reliable. Gunnar has been more valuable defensively according to Fangraphs, the catchers have been worse, Westburg and Mullins have been slightly worse, but Frazier was awful last year at 2B (as was Hicks in the OF) and removing him while adding an elite defender in Cowser puts them about even to last year. The base running is nowhere near as good.   The pitching is slightly worse than last year (18.3 WAR and 3.91 ERA last year, 16.5 WAR and 3.93 ERA this year) but they’ve also had a ton of innings soaked up (mostly due to injuries) by guys that aren’t going to pitch for them in the playoffs. Last year, the below group threw 259 innings and gave up 159 ER’s (5.53 ERA):   Vespi, Irvin, Zimmerman, Fuji, Voth, Lopez, Gillaspie, Flaherty, Akin, Garrett, Givens, Bazardo, McKenna   This year, from they have gotten 366.1 IP from the below group, while giving up 229 ER’s (5.63 ERA):   Vieira, McCann, Krook, Heasley, Rogers, McDermott, Ramirez. Wells, Smith, Povich, Kimbrel, Irvin, Tate, Baker    That means that the rest of the pitching staff in 2023 (besides the above group) threw 1194.2 IP, giving up 472 ER for a 3.55 ERA. In 2024 besides the above group, the rest of the staff has combined for 1022.2 IP, giving up 378 ER for a 3.33 ERA. The 2023 pitching staff had a 6.03 clutch score and a 73.5 LOB%. In 2024, those numbers are -0.93 and 71.4 %. The 2023 pitchers had an xwOBA of .317 (15th). That number is .310 this season (T-9th).    In the offseason, a lot of people were saying this team might be better than last year but finish with a worse record. As frustrating as the last 3 months have been, you could easily make that case. The offense has been better overall, but much worse with RISP and less clutch. The core pitching group has arguably been as good as last year’s, they just had a lot more injuries and innings thrown by fringe guys that won’t be pitching in the playoffs. FWIW, Texas was one of the least clutch teams in the regular season last year and then were unsurprisingly the most clutch team in the playoffs. The Orioles followed up their extremely clutch regular season by being the 2nd least clutch pitching team (only PHI was worse and they played an extra 2 series) and 3rd least clutch batting team (only PHI and MIN were worse - MIN played an extra series as well).    So TLDR. They have arguably been a better team than last year that has dealt with many more injuries, had a lot more PA’s and IP’s from worse players due to those injuries, and have been extremely unclutch. Some of that might be luck, some of it might be skill, but it could change at any time. 
    • And sorta boring, like this thread.
    • Even if they make the playoffs, Bautista isn't going to make it back in time. I do think the O's can't go into next season assuming Bautista is going to be healthy or effective. They really need to acquire a couple bullpen arms and not keep getting folks off the scrap heap. And they can't rely on Soto or even Seranthony to have a key part of the pen. I think Elias has tremendously struck out with anything and everything Phillies bullpen pieces (Kimbrel, Soto, Seranthony). Seranthony has a 0.3 WAR in 22 games, Soto -0.2 in nearly all low leverage situations, and Kimbrel with a -1.1. And the O's are out double digit millions, Seth Johnson, Moises Chace, Austin Hays for what amounts to negative value across the 3 of them. That's...not great.  Could things change in 2025 w/ Seranthony and Soto? Sure! I mean, Seranthony looks decent, but Soto is a situational arm who can be downright dominant or otherworldly incompetent. But Elias can not go into 2025 without picking up 2 reliable bullpen arms. 
    • This post would have been worthy of its own thread.  If I can just augment this, last year’s team was 0.36 runs/game better than average on offense, and 0.43 better than average on run prevention.   This year’s team is 0.40 better than average  on offense, but only 0.21 better on run prevention.  So, the offense actually has been a little better than last year’s relative to the league, while run prevention has been worse.   However, the offense has been very problematic the last 5 weeks or so.    As to bullpen regression, Bautista (10 ER in 61.0 IP) vs. Kimbrel (31 ER in 52.1 IP) explains about 2/3 of the regression all by itself.     
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...