Jump to content

Shintaro Fujinami


Frobby

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Malike said:

I noticed that as well. I will say that I'm not sure if he's getting squeezed or he just throws too hard so when McCann set up outside and he yanked it inside, he had to reach for it, and despite K zone showing it as a strike, I think that reach from McCann at that velo just makes the ump think it's a ball.

Umps should not miss any calls on inside part of the plate even if the target is missed.  The all have their heads directly over the inside corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Umps should not miss any calls on inside part of the plate even if the target is missed.  The all have their heads directly over the inside corner.

They miss calls right down the middle that are perfectly framed, you can't be surprised when the catcher has to make a stab on 101 across the entire plate that they miss that, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Malike said:

They miss calls right down the middle that are perfectly framed, you can't be surprised when the catcher has to make a stab on 101 across the entire plate that they miss that, right?

Again, the umps line up with their heads directly over the inside corner.  That should be the easiest call for them to make.  It shouldn’t matter where the target was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RZNJ said:

Again, the umps line up with their heads directly over the inside corner.  That should be the easiest call for them to make.  It shouldn’t matter where the target was.

Yet they continue to miss them all year long. It's even worse on outside calls when the catcher sets up inside and they pull the ball across the plate to the outside corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Malike said:

Yet they continue to miss them all year long. It's even worse on outside calls when the catcher sets up inside and they pull the ball across the plate to the outside corner.

They miss more calls on the outside corner because they setup on the inside corner.  They have to guess, to some extent, on the outside corner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Just remember "the Sammy Stewart thing" was coming in when the starter was knocked out in the third and go the rest of the game, and that's not a thing any more. Unless we have a very bizarre set of circumstances there's approximately a 0% chance Fujinami pitches 5-6 innings of relief in a game.

I think you are remember how Sammy Stewart was used a bit in 1979 to 1981 a bit. 

In 1979 he pitched 5 or more innings of relief 7 times out of his 28 games of relief, six times in 30 games of relief in 1980, and seven times in 26 relief outings in his brilliant 1981 season. That's 20 times in 84 games of relief he went that distance or more.

By 1983 Stewart threw five or more innings in relief only 2 times in his 58 games. He threw 4 or more 10 times but was mostly used for 2-3 inning stints. Stewart was used 26 times for two or more innings but less than 4 innings. The other 20 innings he threw less than two innings.

In 1984 he only had 5 games where he threw 3 or more innings, none over 4 innings. 

So maybe it's fair to say the 1983-84 Sammy Stewart.

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Below average command. This stuff is going to happen. He’s a guy that can get some outs to finish up the regular season. I don’t think we want him pitching in a playoff series. However, just like Gunnar in April, it’s not what Fuji is now, it’s does he develop into a trusted reliever by the end of September. It’s possible. 

I think he was just a bit nervous. He didn’t exactly get tested in Oakland. Tonight was probably the loudest game he’s ever pitched in. Santander even said he couldn’t here “anything” on the fly ball in the first innings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, baltfan said:

Said he put too much pressure on himself and rushed his delivery.  Didn’t want to let Grayson down.  I hope someone puts an arm around this guy.  

Yeah I saw that too. Seems like he needs a Sports Psychiatrist or someone who can help him cope with pressure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • How about..." we wont win another game in the regular season"?
    • i still like that winning your division matters, at least a little bit.  So I think there's a happy medium between how unbalanced it was, and what you are suggesting.  13 games vs each division team feels right to me, but there are going to be years where that skews the WC thing a bit, because there's always one really bad team, it seems, somewhere (not always as bad as the ChiSox, of course).  I'm not sure how else to further balance it.  Maybe cut back on the NL stuff a bit and play more games against your non-divisional conference rivals so at least there's more head to head to base the WC on.
    • Apparently this post of mine from one year ago killed this thread, as it was the last before today's bump.  In re-reading that, I am reminded (by a past version of myself, LOL) of why I love this sport.  It was actually a bit invigorating reading that back to myself.  LETS GO BIRDS!
    • I've found the older I get, the less interest I have in watching my teams lose. It's a waste of time so I find something else to do. Watching my team lose is not enjoyable so I'd rather do something I'd enjoy. It's not like I'm that old either, just 47. I get a lot more enjoyment out of watching good games with other teams, to be honest. Watching the Bills in the first half last night was fun. The Redskins/Bengals game was fun to watch. Man City and Arsenal on Sunday was great. The Chiefs/Falcons game was a good game. There were a few decent college football games this last weekend as well. I'll watch the game to start tonight and if the O's are down 3-0 after the 1st inning, I'll find something else to do, probably watch some of the other MLB games that have playoff implications.
    • It will be interesting to see if there is any carry over from the HBP's culminating in Heston's beaning.  Hate to say it but that's around when the .500 play started, now much worse.  I did like the way HK stared down Holmes after being hit-I think this series will mean a little more to him.
    • It’s O’s and Yanks. Good guys versus bad guys. Baby Birds up against the Evil Empire — and another trip to the post-season is in the cards. I’ve been cheering for the O’s and very specifically against the Yanks going on six decades, and I’m getting good at it. So, yeah. I’m fired up. Now ask me about hopes and dreams. I don’t think this Orioles team is going to make a run to WS this year.  They have scuffled, they have failed — but I’m reminded, even in the platinum age of data — baseball is still a game of failure.  And man, runners in scoring position over the last week, I’m not sure I want to know that number. They’re still my guys. As long as they’re in it, so am I.
    • Let's go Tampa! Actually, I'm fired up for the offseason.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...