Jump to content

Connolly on Mullins value


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Hank Scorpio said:

I'm happy for Mullins. I remember when Jones sorta took him under his wing when he was first recalled. 

I guess I underestimated his defensive value a bit. 

Some people dismissed him after one terrible year.  He’s a great story.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should be so lucky that Mullins will maintain this level of value through the end of his contract.  If he does, I think we can expect he will not remain an Oriole come 2026.  Best case scenario is we can trade him prior to the 2025 season and replace him with an internal candidate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll just re-post here what I said in the other thread where Connolly’s article was mentioned:

It’s stuff like this that makes Connolly worthless as an analyst.  Nimmo is a much better, more consistent hitter than Mullins.   And, just because the Mets overpaid for him does not mean that Mullins is going to get some king’s ransom when he’s a free agent.  Yes, Mullins is the better defender, but when it comes to getting paid, the bat is king.   

In short, Mullins is a valuable player but the Nimmo contract is irrelevant to his value. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s just take this column at face value for a moment.

Let’s assume Mullins isn’t available in trade in any realistic scenario.

Let’s also assume the Os view him as a long term building block.

Nimmo turns 30 before the season starts.

Mullins will be 31 for his first free agent season.

Does anyone want to sign Mullins to a long term extension now?  Do you feel his speed and defense will continue to be assets in his early to mid 30s?

I think if you want to keep him for 2023, that’s a defensible position to take. I just can’t fathom any thought of a long term extension for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's going to get expensive very quickly. Estimated ARB1 number is $4.4mm. 

I wish he would get on base a bit more but have come to the conclusion that is just not a big part of his game. It does, however, keep him from being an elite leadoff guy.  I'm afraid that his ARB2 and 3 will be numbers that pay him like an elite Leadoff guy. I am not in favor of an extension as I think he doesn't age well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Let’s just take this column at face value for a moment.

Let’s assume Mullins isn’t available in trade in any realistic scenario.

Let’s also assume the Os view him as a long term building block.

Nimmo turns 30 before the season starts.

Mullins will be 31 for his first free agent season.

Does anyone want to sign Mullins to a long term extension now?  Do you feel his speed and defense will continue to be assets in his early to mid 30s?

I think if you want to keep him for 2023, that’s a defensible position to take. I just can’t fathom any thought of a long term extension for him.

Nah not really. I have to think we will figure out another CF solution by the time he hits FA, and I don't think this FO wants any part of a mid-30s Cedric Mullins. 

I also don't think Mullins and his agent will have any interest in an extension now that buys out a couple FA years, for obvious reasons. 

I don't know if Cowser is the answer in CF, but I hope so. I would mark CF depth as an area of concern currently, but there's some time. Would be great to see someone like Haskin separate himself this year. 

Edited by interloper
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Let’s just take this column at face value for a moment.

Let’s assume Mullins isn’t available in trade in any realistic scenario.

Let’s also assume the Os view him as a long term building block.

Nimmo turns 30 before the season starts.

Mullins will be 31 for his first free agent season.

Does anyone want to sign Mullins to a long term extension now?  Do you feel his speed and defense will continue to be assets in his early to mid 30s?

I think if you want to keep him for 2023, that’s a defensible position to take. I just can’t fathom any thought of a long term extension for him.

No way. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Let’s just take this column at face value for a moment.

Let’s assume Mullins isn’t available in trade in any realistic scenario.

Let’s also assume the Os view him as a long term building block.

Nimmo turns 30 before the season starts.

Mullins will be 31 for his first free agent season.

Does anyone want to sign Mullins to a long term extension now?  Do you feel his speed and defense will continue to be assets in his early to mid 30s?

I think if you want to keep him for 2023, that’s a defensible position to take. I just can’t fathom any thought of a long term extension for him.

No way do I sign him to an extension now, unless it's EXTREMELY team friendly.  I'm not sold that he's as good offensively as he was in 2022.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, forphase1 said:

No way do I sign him to an extension now, unless it's EXTREMELY team friendly.  I'm not sold that he's as good offensively as he was in 2022.

Which wasn't as good as his 2021. I view 2022 as his baseline, but I wouldn't really argue much against your opinion here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Are you directing that at me?    
    • I think probably what’s bothering people the most is that Holliday was hitting unbelievably well as of his call-up (.333/.462/.595), and he hasn’t been at that level of domination since being sent down (.259/.437/.445).  Plus, his K rate was 14.3% before the call-up, 24.2% since.   Bottom line, his meteoric ascent last year and his fast start this year set crazy-high expectations that he’s not quite meeting.   Personally, I’m not worried at all, but I’d like to see his post-return BA back in the .300ish range before I’d be clamoring for another call-up.   
    • I didn't say he was good.  I don't trust Akin with runners on. And certainly not in high leverage situations. The numbers show that as much. His numbers against lefties don't matter if he melts down when runners are on.  If they were that worried about a lefty masher Garver and know how bad Akin can be in these types of situations, then why put him in with Garver on deck?  I guess, to me, I leave Baker in. If he gets out of it, then Akin can sit down or if he comes in...pitch around Garver. The hitters after him aren't exactly Murderer's Row. Look at how he performed with nobody on vs. runners on (bases clearing double, 2 run homer)
    • I meant for both. Although thinking about it, Texas would probably want Beavers, they have the corner OF spots covered.
    • Yeah. Not your fault. Poor way they handle it. Don’t get it. 
    • Your link does say inherited runners allowed to score but that’s not accurate. I don’t get why they have it incorrectly listed that way. 
    • Do they? Is it? I'm pretty sure we've gone over the whole strikeouts don't increase pitch counts thing a hundred times. I think if managers wanted starters to go deep in games you would see more starters go deep into games. Is there one team in the majors in which the starters are going appreciably deeper into games? Baltimore is fifth in innings by starters.
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...